A review of the cellular and molecular effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina Chamberlain ◽  
Robert Colborne

SummaryExtracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a novel therapeutic modality and its use in promoting connective tissue repair and analgesic effect has been advocated in the literature. It is convenient, cost-effective, and has negligible complications; it therefore bypasses many of the problems associated with surgical interventions. This paper reviews the proposed mechanisms of action in promoting tissue repair and regeneration as well as analysing its efficacy providing an analgesic effect in clinical applications. Further research will be required to not only identify the underlying mechanisms more precisely, but will also be critical for ensuring consistency across the literature so that the most beneficial treatment protocol can be developed. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy stands as a promising alternative modality in promoting tissue repair.

Author(s):  
Tengku Nazim B. Tengku Yusof ◽  
Dexter Seow ◽  
Khushdeep S. Vig

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) was first introduced into clinical practice in 1982 and has proved to be a beneficial adjuvant in the non-invasive treatment of numerous orthopaedic pathologies. However, clinical evidence reporting the use of ESWT in treating musculoskeletal disorders of the foot and ankle remain limited and a general consensus on its efficacy has not been achieved. Therefore, we reviewed the available literature and analysed any reported evidence in order to determine the benefits of ESWT in this cohort. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed for any clinical studies that reported the treatment of foot and ankle disorders with ESWT. RESULTS: A total of 24 clinical studies, including 12 randomised control trials and 12 case series, were identified and included into this study. Analysis of the reported evidence indicate that ESWT can be beneficial in the symptomatic management of plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur, Achilles tendinopathy and Morton's neuroma. However, differences in ESWT protocols used limit the generalizability of these findings and prevented an optimum treatment protocol from being determined. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the articles analysed in this review suggest a beneficial healing effect of ESWT in treating musculoskeletal disorders affecting the foot and ankle, with minimal side effects being reported. Thus, ESWT can be used safely in combination with other treatment modalities in order to achieve the best patient outcomes. Future studies should attempt to optimize the treatment protocols of ESWT to confirm these findings.


Author(s):  
Richard Crevenna ◽  
Michael Mickel ◽  
Othmar Schuhfried ◽  
Christina Gesslbauer ◽  
Andrej Zdravkovic ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (fESWT) is a physical treatment modality developed over the last 25 years for musculoskeletal indications. It has many indications in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) and is effective, time-efficient, and cost-efficient. This review focuses on basics and on clinical indications as well as on significant trends in fESWT. Recent Findings In PM&R, stimulation of healing processes in tendons, surrounding tissue, and bones via mechanotransduction seems to be a relevant biological effect. The International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST) describes different types of indications (such as approved standard indications—in accordance with most scientific evidence—like calcifying tendinopathy of the shoulder, plantar fasciitis lateral epicondylopathy of the elbow, greater trochanter pain syndrome, patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy and bone non-union, common empirically tested clinical uses, exceptional or expert indications, and experimental indications). Summary fESWT is a relevant treatment option in PM&R and regenerative medicine. In recent years, historical paradigms (for example, application in cancer patients) have changed and new indications (such as nerve regeneration, myofascial trapezius syndrome, low back pain, dermatosclerosis, and lymphedema) are supported. Future translational research should focus on establishing actual exceptional indications and experimental indications for clinical routine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem EL-Mallah ◽  
Enas A. Elattar

Abstract Background Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is considered the commonest tendon pathology, occurring mainly in athletes. Different conservative treatment options have been introduced but with short-term effects; however, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and mesotherapy (MT) injections were claimed to provide longer effects and could be used in cases failure of response to conservative treatments. The objective of our prospective 12-week study was to compare the effect of ESWT and MT on chronic Achilles tendinopathy in athletes by both clinical and ultrasonographical assessment. Results Forty patients with chronic AT diagnosed clinically and with high-resolution ultrasound (US) randomly allocated in two groups first received weekly ESWT session, and the other group underwent weekly MT sessions for 4 consecutive weeks. Both groups improved during the treatment and follow-up period. The mean visual analogue score (VAS) decreased in both the ESWT group and the MT group. Mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and VAS scores were not significantly different between ESWT and MT groups at the 4th and the 12th week of follow-up. However, US assessment significantly improved after 12 weeks in the ESWT group (as regards tendon thickness, calcifications, and Doppler signal), and for the mesotherapy group, there was the only improvement of tendon thickness. Conclusion ESWT showed improvement of pain and inflammation and calcifications of AT than MT injections, which was documented by US improved findings at week 12 follow up.


2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110268
Author(s):  
Seyedeh Niloufar Rafiei Alavi ◽  
Arian Madani Neishaboori ◽  
Mahmoud Yousefifard

Background As there is no consensus over the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of spinal cord injury complications, the current meta-analysis aims to investigate preclinical evidence on the matter. Methods The search strategy was developed based on keywords related to ‘spinal cord injury’ and ‘extracorporeal shockwave therapy’. A primary search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science until the end of 2020. Studies which administered extracorporeal shockwave therapy on spinal cord injury animal models and evaluated motor function and/or histological findings were included. The standardised mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results Seven articles were included. Locomotion was significantly improved in the extracorporeal shockwave therapy treated group (standardised mean difference 1.68, 95% CI 1.05–2.31, P=0.032). It seems that the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with an energy flux density of 0.1 mJ/mm2 is higher than 0.04 mJ/mm2 ( P=0.044). Shockwave therapy was found to increase axonal sprouting (standardised mean difference 1.31, 95% CI 0.65, 1.96), vascular endothelial growth factor tissue levels (standardised mean difference 1.36, 95% CI 0.54, 2.18) and cell survival (standardised mean difference 2.49, 95% CI 0.93, 4.04). It also significantly prevents axonal degeneration (standardised mean difference 2.25, 95% CI 1.47, 3.02). Conclusion Extracorporeal shockwave therapy significantly improves locomotor recovery in spinal cord injury animal models through neural tissue regeneration. Nonetheless, in spite of the promising results and clinical application of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in various conditions, current evidence implies that designing clinical trials on extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of spinal cord injury may not be soon. Hence, further preclinical studies with the effort to reach the safest and the most efficient treatment protocol are needed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 207-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Jen Wang ◽  
Jai-Hong Cheng ◽  
Yur-Ren Kuo ◽  
Wolfgang Schaden ◽  
Rainer Mittermayr

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. R139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Jen Wang ◽  
Chien-Yiu Huang ◽  
Shan-Ling Hsu ◽  
Jen-Hung Chen ◽  
Jai-Hong Cheng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document