Effect of lower muscular function on Aerobic Capacity in adult women

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1055-1063
Author(s):  
Seung-Wook Choi
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1177-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Higgins ◽  
Michael V. Fedewa ◽  
Elizabeth D. Hathaway ◽  
Michael D. Schmidt ◽  
Ellen M. Evans

The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of sprint interval training (SIT) and moderate-intensity continuous cycle training (MICT), with equal estimated energy expenditure during training on body composition and aerobic capacity. Body composition measured via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and aerobic capacity were assessed following 6 weeks of training in previously inactive overweight/obese young women (n = 52; age, 20.4 ± 1.5 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 4.5 kg·m−2, 67.3% white). Training was performed in a group-exercise format that mimicked cycling classes offered by commercial fitness facilities, and included 3 weekly sessions of either 30-s “all-out” sprints followed by 4 min of active recovery (SIT), or continuous cycling at 60%–70% heart rate reserve to expend a similar amount of energy. Participants were randomized to SIT or MICT, attended a similar number of sessions (15.0 ± 1.5 sessions vs. 15.8 ± 1.9 sessions, P = 0.097) and expended a similar amount of energy (541.8 ± 104.6 kJ·session−1 vs. 553.5 ± 138.1 kJ·session−1, P = 0.250). Without significant changes in body mass (P > 0.05), greater relative reductions occurred in SIT than in MICT in total fat mass (3.6% ± 5.6% vs. 0.6% ± 3.9%, P = 0.007), and android fat mass (6.6% ± 6.9% vs. 0.7% ± 6.5%, P = 0.002). Aerobic capacity (mL·kg−1·min−1) increased significantly following both interventions (P < 0.05), but the relative increase was 2-fold greater in SIT than in MICT (14.09% ± 10.31% vs. 7.06% ± 7.81%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, sprint-interval cycling reduces adiposity and increases aerobic capacity more than continuous moderate-intensity cycling of equal estimated energy expenditure in overweight/obese young women.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte A. Pratt ◽  
Violet Woo ◽  
Barbara Chrisley

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1640-1647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Salom Huffman ◽  
Danielle D. Wadsworth ◽  
James R. McDonald ◽  
Shelby J. Foote ◽  
Hayden Hyatt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Monira I. Aldhahi ◽  
Wafa K. Al Khalil ◽  
Rawan B. Almutiri ◽  
Mada M. Alyousefi ◽  
Bayader S. Alharkan ◽  
...  

Background: Overweight individuals face weight-related stigmatization, driving self-exclusion from exercise and physical activity. The extent to which weight self-stigma and self-esteem are associated with aerobic capacity remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the cardiopulmonary fitness, weight self-stigma, and self-esteem of overweight women and examine whether weight self-stigma and self-esteem predict cardiopulmonary aerobic capacity. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 66 women stratified into two groups: a normal weight (NW) group and an overweight (OW) group. The mean body mass indexes and ages of the NW and OW groups were 20.4 ± 0.36 kg/m2 and 29.5 ± 0.8 kg/m2, and 24 ± 7 years and 21 ± 3 years, respectively. Submaximal exercise testing using the modified Bruce treadmill protocol was conducted to measure the predicted oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) and energy expenditure. The Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were used. Results: Significantly lower mean of predicted VO2 peak and higher mean of energy expenditure were reported in the OW group compared with the NW group (25.8 ± 5.3 mL/kg/min vs. 28.7 ± 4.8 mL/kg/min, p = 0.001 and 9.7 ± 1.9 kcal/min vs. 7.5 ± 1.8 kcal, p = 0.03, respectively). There was a significant difference in weight self-stigma and self-esteem between the groups. Regression model analysis indicated that weight self-stigma and self-esteem explained 45% of the variance in the predicted VO2 peak. Conclusion: Strategies enhancing self-esteem and avoiding stigmatization should be embraced to promote fitness and engagement in physical activity among OW women.


Author(s):  
Emily Holcombe ◽  
Jennifer Manlove ◽  
Erum Ikramullah

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Bankoff ◽  
Sarah E. Valentine ◽  
Michelle A. Jackson ◽  
Rebecca L. Schacht ◽  
David W. Pantalone

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann C. Bilbrey ◽  
Aleksandra Stepanenko ◽  
Johanna Rengifo Nevarez ◽  
Renee Marquett ◽  
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document