Is the Virus of International Macroeconomic Interventionism Infectious? An ABCT Analysis

According to Austrian business cycle theory (ABCT), there is no macroeconomic market failure. Under laissez faire capitalism, with extremely limited or no government, there will be no credit-induced business cycles. However, suppose one part of the world engages in credit expansion, which, according to ABCT creates the business cycle, while another does not. Will the former infect the latter? Or will the latter be impervious to the governmental depredations of the former? We take the position that although the free market society will not remain impervious to the government failure of the interventionists, it will be sheltered from the full impact of the boom-bust cycle. Do the residual malinvestments constitute a market failure? After all, a free market, in this case, is indeed "failing" to bring about the greatest satisfaction of consumer preferences. We deny this claim.

Download Full-text

The Phenomenon of Speculative Bubble in the Light of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Equilibrium ◽

10.12775/equil.2010.004 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 51-63 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jarosław Cholewiński

Keyword(s):

Business Cycle ◽

House Prices ◽

Historical Analysis ◽

The United States ◽

Business Cycle Theory ◽

Credit Expansion ◽

Austrian Business Cycle Theory ◽

Speculative Bubble ◽

Cyclical Fluctuations ◽

Austrian Business Cycle

The article presents the modern interpretation of the Austrian business cycle theory and the look at the phenomenon of economic bubble through the lens of that theory. The aim of the article is to answer the question ‘What is the main cause of economic bubbles’. The author suggests that it is a depiction which integrates cyclical fluctuations induced by credit expansion with the phenomenon of speculative bubble. Capital-based macroeconomics proposed by Garrison can become a core of universal economic theorizing. The model presented by the author shows how credit expansion that decreases interest rate of credits below its natural level causes medium-run discoordination of production structure. Disruptions that lies in the strong fluctuations of capital goods during a cyclical episode can be understand as consecutive stages of speculative bubble. In the paper the author conducted a historical analysis of data to investigate whether the dramatic increase in house prices that occurred in the United States after the year 2000 could have been triggered by credit expansion. The author summarizes that such hypothesis can’t be rejected.

Download Full-text

Economic Fluctuations in Turkey in the Light of Business Cycle Theories

International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2012 ◽

10.36880/c03.00525 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

Emine Fırat

Keyword(s):

Business Cycle ◽

Market Failure ◽

Free Market ◽

Economic Fluctuations ◽

Past Century ◽

Business Cycle Theory ◽

Macroeconomic Policies ◽

Business Cycle Model ◽

The Business Cycle ◽

The Right

Some economists have tried to demonstrate the cause of economic fluctuations and its solution with business cycle theories. The classical school emphasizes the efficiency of free market economy and the optimization of private economic factors. The Keynesian school believes that the causes of economic fluctuations arise from not only just the deviations from market equilibrium but also market failure on a grand scale. The debate over the source and propagation of economic fluctuations rages as fiercely today as it did in the Great Depression that began in 1929. Economic Fluctuation models investigate to answer the question of why economies go through boom and bust and why economies experience cycles of recession and recovery. In the economic literature, based on the Business Cycle Theories many different approaches have been proposed. While economists discuss the ultimate form of the right business cycle model, they must take into consideration the decisive factors of economic fluctuations in the past century. In this study, the local economic crisis occurred in Turkey in recent years are investigated in the light of Business Cycle Theory and also the effects of macroeconomic policies are evaluated on the basis of economic fluctuations models.

Download Full-text

Austrian business cycle theory: are 100 percent reserves sufficient to prevent a business cycle?

REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO ◽

10.52195/pm.v9i1.240 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 389-410

Author(s):

Philipp Bagus

Keyword(s):

Business Cycles ◽

Business Cycle ◽

Banking System ◽

Government Support ◽

Business Cycle Theory ◽

Credit Expansion ◽

Austrian Business Cycle Theory ◽

Maturity Mismatching ◽

Demand Deposits ◽

Austrian Business Cycle

Economists in the tradition of the Austrian school have shown that one type of maturity mismatching can cause maladjustments and business cycles.1 When banks expand credit, by granting loans and creating demand deposits, they generate immediately withdrawable liabilities to finance longer-term loans. The newly created demand deposits do not represent a reduction of consumption, i.e., that characterized by real savings. As a con sequence, in terest rates are artificially reduced under the level they would have been in a free market reflecting real savings and time preference rates.2 Thus, entrepreneurs are prone to engage in more and longer projects than could be financed with the available supply of real savings. Before all projects that are financed by the credit expansion are finished, a bust occurs. An absence of realsavings to sustain the factors of production in the production pro cesses and to produce complementary and necessary capital goods becomes evident. As a result, malinvestments are liquidated and the structure of production is brought in line with consumer preferences again. This is the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) in a nutshell. As a remedy Austrian economists such as Selgin (1988) and White (1999) have argued that a free banking system would be a means to inhibit the excessive credit expansion that causes business cycles. They maintain that the competition between banks would limit the credit expansion of the banking system effectively. Other Austrians such as Rothbard (1991) and Huerta de Soto (2006) have gone further and advocate a 100 percent re - rerve banking system ruling out credit expansion altogether.3 In this article it is argued that a 100 percent reserve system can still bring about artificial booms by maturity mismatching if there is a central bank or government support and guarantees for the ban king system. Even if we accept the case for a 100 percent re - serve requirement, we see that the maturity mismatching of liabilities and assets (borrowing short and lending long) is itself perilous–and in the same sense that fractional reserves are perilous.

Download Full-text