Korean Humanitarian Policy Governance Building Process and its Complex Factors

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-50
Author(s):  
Jiyoung HONG
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213
Author(s):  
Hnidets R ◽  
◽  
Yasinskyi M ◽  

Understanding the tradition, innovation and national identity of examples of wooden temple buildings, in particular, Ukrainian churches, certain trends are identified, which in their essence become the main ones, regarding the intensity of development in temple construction. The factors of tradition and innovation are identified as important mediums for establishing the national identity of the image of wooden temple buildings, and their expression in the modern temple-building process of creating a Christian shrine.


Author(s):  
Giulia Santos Dias ◽  
Danielly Batista da Silva ◽  
Flavio Seixas
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sahr Conway-Lanz

The Korean War demonstrated the serious problems that the United States had adhering to the new 1949 Geneva Conventions and the severely limited protections that these new treaties provided. The protections for war victims were undermined both by serious gaps in the treaties that failed to provide much safety from bombing to civilians and by US deviations from the agreements in the handling of refugees and prisoners of war. However, Americans did not discard the agreements in the wake of their troubled Korean War experiences. Instead, the war helped to legitimize and lay the foundation for the further internalization of the new laws through their formal implementation, the public controversy they generated, and a boomerang effect of atrocity accusations. Despite failing to provide much protection for Korean War victims, the treaties were part of a broader international consensus-building process that helped to spread humanitarian norms.


Author(s):  
Ariel M. Domlyn ◽  
Victoria Scott ◽  
Melanie Livet ◽  
Andrea Lamont ◽  
Amber Watson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-525
Author(s):  
Diana Betzler

AbstractThis article deals with the question of whether regional cultural competence centers foster the diversity of cultural expressions and how the objectives of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) Convention on Cultural Diversity are implemented. By introducing the Convention on Cultural Diversity, the conditions of regional cultural policy governance, and the idea of regional cultural competence centers, a framework for evaluation is outlined. The evaluation of four regional cultural competence centers in the Swiss Central Region shows that fostering cultural diversity is complex and has many different approaches and effects. The final discussion concludes that principles such as “interculturality,” “freedom,” and “access for all” under the Convention on Cultural Diversity can promote a diversity of cultural expressions but that these criteria have to be set from outside—for example, by public funding institutions—so that regional actors implement them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document