scholarly journals CHANGES IN STROMAL PROGENITOR CELLS DERIVED FROM BONE MARROW IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKAEMIA AT THE ONSET OF THE DISEASE AND DURING TREATMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-435
Author(s):  
N. A. Petinati ◽  
I. N. Shipunova ◽  
A. E. Bigildeev ◽  
N. V. Sats ◽  
E. Yu. Chelysheva ◽  
...  

Introduction. The properties of progenitor cells in the stromal microenvironment, i.e. multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSC) and fi broblast colony-forming units (CFU-F), undergo changes in patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML).Aim. To compare the progenitor cells of the stromal microenvironment (MMSCs and CFU-Fs) obtained from the bone marrow of CML patients at the onset of the disease, one year after the start of the treatment and during the long-term treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).Materials and methods. The study involved an analysis of the characteristics of MMSCs, the concentration of CFU-Fs in the bone marrow of CML patients, as well as the relative expression level of genes (REL) associated with differentiation and involved in the regulation of haematopoiesis. The analysis was performed at the onset of the disease, one year after the start of the treatment, as well as 3–8 and 9–16 years after the TKI therapy. MMSCs and CFU-Fs of healthy donors were used for control purposes.Results. The concentration of CFU-Fs at the onset of the disease did not differ from that in donors; however, the relative expression level of genes associated with differentiation was increased in the CFU-F colonies. A year after the start of TKI treatment, the concentration of CFU-Fs decreased by four times. Subsequently, the concentration increased to reach normal values following 8 years of TKI treatment. The total production of MMSCs was not changed at the onset of the disease; however, it decreased after a year of TKI treatment, subsequently returning to normal. The expression of many genes was altered in the MMSCs of patients, i.e. the REL of LIF and JAG1 increased by 10 and 2 times, respectively; in the course of treatment, the REL of LIF in MMSCs decreased, always remaining higher than in those of the donors, whereas the expression of JAG1 returned to normal. At the onset of the disease, the REL of LIF in the MMSCs of patients, who achieved a deep molecular response (DMR) within 17 months of the treatment, was three times lower than in the MMSCs of those patients who did not reach DMR within 50 months, with JAG1 not differing from that of donors.Conclusion. Changes in stromal progenitor cells are associated with the influence of tumour cells, as well as with TKI therapy. A normal expression level of JAG1 and a decreased expression level of LIF in the MMSCs of CML patients at the onset of the disease may be predictive of DMR achievement.Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.Financial disclosure: the study had no sponsorship.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3378-3378
Author(s):  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Heiko Konig ◽  
Tinisha Mcdonald ◽  
Tessa L. Holyoake ◽  
Dario Campana ◽  
...  

Abstract The therapeutic success of imatinib mesylate (IM) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is impaired by persistence of malignant hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). The bone marrow microenvironment regulates the self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation of HSPC. We investigated the role of microenvironmental interactions in resistance of CML HSPC to elimination by BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). CML CD34+CD38− primitive progenitor cells and CD34+CD38+ committed progenitor cells were cultured for 96 hours with IM (5μM), nilotinib (5μM) and dasatinib(150nM), in medium supplemented with low concentrations of growth factors, with and without irradiated primary human marrow stromal cells (immortalized by ectopic telomerase expression) followed by an assessment of apoptosis and proliferation. Culture with stroma did not result in significant alteration of apoptosis in the absence of TKI treatment (3.1±0.7% apoptosis for primitive progenitors with stroma and 2.7±0.9% without stroma, 3.7±0.2% for committed progenitors with stroma and 4.7±2.1% without stroma). Coculture with stroma completely protected CML primitive and committed progenitors from TKI-induced apoptosis. CML CD34+CD38− cells demonstrated 20±6% apoptosis following culture with IM in the absence of stroma, but only 3.8±1% apoptosis in the presence of stroma (p=0.04, n=4). Similarly, apoptosis with nilotinib decreased from 12.5±1.8% without stroma to 2.9±0.3% with stroma (p=0.033), and apoptosis with dasatinib decreased from 7.1±0.04% without stroma to 2.7±0.2% with stroma (p=0.001). Apoptosis of CML CD34+CD38+ cells also significantly decreased following TKI treatment with 12.9±4.0%, 10.6±3.2%, 8.4±2.3% apoptosis observed after IM, nilotinib and dasatinib treatment respectively without stroma and 7.1±1.2%, 4.8±1.0%, 3.7±0.4% with stroma, (p=0.04, p=0.03 and p=0.02 respectively, n=4). Culture with stroma resulted in mild reduction in CML progenitor proliferation in the absence of TKI treatment, but TKI treatment resulted in similar degrees of inhibition of proliferation regardless of the presence of stroma. Culture of CML CD34+ cells in a Transwell insert with 0.45μm pores, allowing free diffusion of stromal factors but preventing direct contact with stroma, was associated with reduction in the protective effect of stroma coculture (32.2% apoptosis without stroma, 14.7% with stroma, and 24.6% with Transwell insert). Addition of blocking antibodies to a4 integrin and N-cadherin did not affect survival of CML CD34+ cells in the absence of IM, but resulted in enhanced apoptosis of CML CD34+ cells cocultured with stroma after addition of IM (20.4% apoptosis without antibody, 28.9% with anti-N-cadherin, and 29.8% with anti-integrin antibody). We conclude that the bone marrow stromal microenvironment protects CML primitive and committed progenitors from pro-apoptotic effects of BCR-ABL TKI treatment. Direct contact-mediated interactions, likely through VLA-4 and N-Cadherin, play an important role in protecting CML CD34+ cells from TKI-mediated apoptosis. These observations indicate that measures aimed at interfering with the protective effects of stroma could be of benefit for the eradication of residual malignant progenitors in CML patients receiving BCR-ABL TKI treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 2421-2428
Author(s):  
Maximilian Von Laffert ◽  
Mathias Hänel ◽  
Manfred Dietel ◽  
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Korinna Jöhrens

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5065-5065
Author(s):  
Tamara Sorokina ◽  
Irina Shipounova ◽  
Alexey Bigildeev ◽  
Nina I. Drize ◽  
Larisa A. Kuzmina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In patients with acute leukemia the stromal microenvironment is deeply modified. Disturbances in signaling pathways, genetic abnormalities and functional changes in mesenchymal cells of these patients have been previously described. Chemotherapy also affect stromal progenitor cells. A damaged microenvironment might impair hematopoiesis in acute leukemia patients. Aims To investigate the relative expression level in MMSCs and CFU-Fs, derived from the bone marrow (BM) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients before and over the course of chemotherapy. Methods 54 newly diagnosed cases (33 AML, 21 ALL) were involved in the study after informed consent. BM was aspirated prior to any treatment (time-point 0) and at days 37, 100 and 180 since the beginning of treatment of acute leukemia. MMSCs were cultured in aMEM with 10% fetal calf serum, CFU-Fs, in aMEM with 20% fetal calf serum. The relative expression level (REL) of different genes was measured by TaqMan RQ-PCR. As a control MMSCs and CFU-Fs from 88 healthy donors were used. Results At the time of the disease manifestation the analysis of gene expression in MMSCs from acute leukemia patients revealed a significant increase in the REL of genes which regulate immune system responses and thereby can influence on the leukemic cell proliferation and migration (IL-6, IL-8, IL-1b and IL-1R1) (Pic.1). Also at the time of the diagnosis an increase in REL of genes, that are responsible for hematopoiesis regulation, was observed. For example, the REL of CSF1 that can influence on leukemic cells proliferation was increased at the disease manifestation and became normal during the treatment. The same dynamics was observed in the REL of JAG1 that has an antiapoptotic effect on leukemic cells. The REL of LIF had been also significantly increased at the disease manifestation, reflecting the efforts of MMSCs to inhibit leukemic proliferation. Chemotherapy affected REL of the studied genes differently. The treatment lead to the downregulation of IGF, TGFB1 and TGFB2 (Pic.2). As far asTGFB1 and 2 inhibit the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, and IGF is associated with myelodysplastic changes in elderly bone marrow, so their downregulation may refer to the effectiveness of therapy. The REL of genes regulating MMSC proliferation (PDGFRa and PDGFRb, FGF2, FGFR1 and 2) increased during chemotherapy. Exploring cell adhesion molecules, the decrease in the REL of their encoding genes was observed. As far as VCAM facilitate the leukemic cell extravasation and ICAM was shown to depress the Th17 cell differentiation, the down-regulation of their genes may reflect the microenvironment restoration. The influence of chemotherapy lead to decrease in REL of genes, associated with MMSCs differentiation (BGLAP and SOX9 (Pic.3)), reflecting the mechanism of the blocking of MMSCs migration and differentiation under the stress conditions. The alterations of bone marrow stroma were more pronounced in patients who didn't achieve remission. The REL of 9 genes was studied in CFU-F colonies. There were no differences in gene expression in CFU-Fs before the treatment, except for an increase in the REL of PPARg in acute leukemia CFU-Fs. During the treatment, a decrease in the REL of SPP1 and an increase in the REL of FGFR1 and 2 were observed. Conclusion Therefore, chemotherapy used does not impair the functional ability of MMSCs and CFU-Fs, but influence on their gene expression profile. The two types of precursors are affected differently, indicating their different differentiation level and functions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1996 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Carella ◽  
M. Podestà ◽  
E. Lerma ◽  
A. Dejana ◽  
E. Prencipe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document