scholarly journals Fiscal Implications for Rural-Urban Income Inequality: The Case of Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol IX (Issue 2) ◽  
pp. 246-259
Author(s):  
Khalil Ahmad ◽  
Safdar Ali ◽  
Ayesha Haider ◽  
Muhammad Shahid ◽  
Muhammad
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Heinrich Mora ◽  
Cate Heine ◽  
Jacob Jackson ◽  
Geoffrey West ◽  
Vicky Chuqiao Yang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varun Chotia ◽  
N.V.M. Rao

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between infrastructure development, rural–urban income inequality and poverty for BRICS economies. Design/methodology/approach Pedroni’s panel co-integration test and panel dynamic ordinary least squares (PDOLS) have been used to carry out the analysis. Findings The empirical findings confirm a long-run relationship among infrastructure development, poverty and rural–urban inequality. The PDOLS results suggest that both infrastructure development and economic growth lead to poverty reduction in BRICS. However, rural–urban income inequality aggravates poverty in these nations. The paper advocates for adopting policies aimed at strengthening infrastructure and achieving economic growth to reduce the current levels of poverty prevailing in the BRICS nations. Originality/value Significant limitations exist in the literature in terms of not clearly defining the nature of relationship and interlinkages between infrastructure development, poverty and inequality, with regard to the BRICS nations. The available studies mainly focus on the relationship between infrastructure and growth, with the universal agreement being that these two are positively related. However, it is still not right to assume that economic growth attributable to infrastructure development will, therefore, subsequently lead to a reduction in inequality. This forms the basis for this study, that is, to critically examine the relationship between infrastructure development, inequality and poverty for BRICS nations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
VICTOR BRAJER ◽  
ROBERT W. MEAD ◽  
FENG XIAO

ABSTRACTGiven the extensive discussion of China's air pollution and urban income inequality problems, relatively little attention has been paid to any relationship which may exist between the two. This paper seeks to do so, by exploring the existence of environmental equity in China. Specifically, we first calculate traditional measures of urban income inequality (the Gini coefficient and Theil's T and L indices) for the years 1995 and 2004. Then, we estimate ‘pollution-adjusted’ incomes using China-based health functions and economic valuation studies, and recalculate the income (or now welfare) inequality measures. The results indicate that as pollution cleanup efforts gain traction over time, the regressive consequences of pollution may diminish. We thus conclude with an encouraging note for developing countries: improving welfare distribution can coexist with an improving environment.


2006 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Démurger ◽  
Martin Fournier ◽  
Shi Li

Author(s):  
Sylvie Démurger ◽  
Martin Fournier ◽  
Li Shi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document