scholarly journals Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Yul Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Ischemic Attack

scholarly journals Antithrombotic Prescription at Discharge in Medicare Patients with Ischemic Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack: Results from the National Stroke Project

Stroke ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 376-377
Author(s):  
Timothy F Kresowik ◽  
David S Nilasena ◽  
Anton F Piskac ◽  
Rebecca A Hemann ◽  
Marian A Brenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Patterns Of Use ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Univariate Analyses

P205 Background: Antiplatelet agents have been shown to be effective for secondary stroke prevention in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). As part of HCFA’s National Stroke Project, we examined patterns of use of antithrombotic agents for inpatients with IS or TIA. Methods: Findings were based on abstracted data from a sample of Medicare inpatient medical records (discharge dates 4/98 - 3/99). All U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico were sampled using a systematic random approach. Each record had a principal diagnosis of one of the following ICD-9-CM codes: 362.34, 433.xx, 434.xx, 435.0, 435.1, 435.3, 435.8, 435.9 or 436. The main outcome measure was the frequency of eligible patients with a prescription or a plan for antithrombotic therapy at discharge. Antithrombotics were aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticlopidine and warfarin. Results: Of the 36,650 cases reviewed, 25,659 met the criteria for inclusion in the indicator. A large percentage of excluded cases (53.1%) were removed due to a history or current finding of hemorrhage. Nationwide, 20,947 (unadjusted rate 81.6%) patients were prescribed an antithrombotic at discharge or had a plan for starting an antithrombotic after discharge. The state-specific rates ranged from 72.0% to 90.1%. Univariate analyses showed this therapy was prescribed less frequently (p<0.001) for adults 85 years and over (rate=77.8%, OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.69–0.80), women (rate=80.4%, OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.78–0.89) and African-Americans (rate=77.6%, OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.68–0.85). Asians were found to have been prescribed this therapy more frequently than other races (p<0.02, rate=87.2%, OR=1.54 95% CI=1.10–2.16). Among those IS/TIA patients who also had atrial fibrillation (AF), 57.1% received warfarin. Conclusions: Antithrombotic agents are not prescribed for almost one-fifth of eligible Medicare inpatients with IS/TIA. For those with IS/TIA and AF, a large proportion are not treated with warfarin. These results show important opportunities for improvement in secondary stroke prevention for Medicare patients.

scholarly journals Benefits and Risks of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review for the 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin L. Brown ◽  
Deborah A. Levine ◽  
Karen Albright ◽  
Moira K. Kapral ◽  
Lester Y. Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ischemic Attack

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack may reduce recurrent stroke but also increase severe bleeding compared with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association convened an evidence review committee to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and risks of DAPT compared with SAPT for secondary ischemic stroke prevention. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on December 5, 2019, to identify phase III or IV randomized controlled trials (n≥100) from December 1999 to December 2019. We calculated unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and performed meta-analyses of studies based on the duration of treatment (short [≤90 days] versus long [>90 days]). RESULTS: Three short-duration randomized controlled trials were identified that enrolled mostly patients with minor stroke or high risk transient ischemic attack. In these trials, DAPT, compared with SAPT, was associated with a lower 90-day risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (pooled RR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.55–0.83], I 2 =37.1%). There was no significant increase in major bleeding with DAPT in short-duration trials (pooled RR, 1.88 [95% CI, 0.93–3.83], I 2 =8.9%). In 2 long-duration treatment randomized controlled trials (mean treatment duration, 18-40 months), DAPT was not associated with a significant reduction in recurrent ischemic stroke (pooled RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79–1.02], I 2 =1.4%), but was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (pooled RR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.37–4.30], I 2 =75.5%). CONCLUSIONS: DAPT was more effective than SAPT for prevention of secondary ischemic stroke when initiated early after the onset of minor stroke/high-risk transient ischemic attack and treatment duration was <90 days. However, when the treatment duration was longer and initiated later after stroke or transient ischemic attack onset, DAPT was not more effective than SAPT for ischemic stroke prevention and it increased the risk of bleeding.

Abstract 159: Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prescription Patterns for Secondary Prevention in Patients With Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xian ◽  
Peter Shrader ◽  
Eric Smith ◽  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Deepak L Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Class Iib ◽  
Over Time

Background: The recommendations for dual antiplatelet (DAPT aspirin + clopidogrel) for secondary stroke prevention has evolved over time. Following the publication of CHANCE trial (07/2013), the AHA/ASA updated the DAPT recommendations from Class III harm (10/2010) for patient with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, to Class IIb benefit ≥ risk (02/2014), and Class IIa benefit >> risk (03/2018) for a subgroup of patients with minor stroke (NIHSS≤3). Subsequent to the last guideline update, the POINT trial (05/2018) provided further support for the effectiveness of DAPT. Methods: We evaluated antiplatelet prescription patterns of 1,024,074 noncardioembolic ischemic stroke survivors (median age 65 years and 46% women) eligible for antiplatelet therapy (no contraindications) and discharged from the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals between Q1 2011 and Q1 2019. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar within the four periods: pre-CHANCE (01/2011-07/2013), pre-2014 guideline update (08/2013-02/2014), pre-POINT/2018 guideline update (03/2014-05/2018), and post-POINT (06/2018-03/2019). Use of DAPT gradually increased from 16.7% in the pre-CHANCE period, to 19.4% pre-2014 guideline update, 23.3% pre-POINT/2018 guideline update, and 29.8% post-POINT period (p<0.001, Figure). Yet increase in DAPT use was observed over time for individuals with NIHSS≤3 (17.1%, 19.9%, 24.1%, and 31.4%, p<0.001) and those with NIHSS>3 (18.7%, 22.8%, 28.3%, and 28.3%, p<0.001). Conclusions: A sustained increase in DAPT use for secondary stroke prevention was observed after publication of pivotal trials and AHA guideline updates. While recommended for minor strokes or TIA only, such increase was also observed in ischemic stroke patients with NIHSS>3, where the risk-benefit ratio of DAPT remains to be established.

scholarly journals Antiplatelet therapy in stroke prevention after non-cardioembolic transient ischemic attack

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
A. V. Fonyakin ◽  
L. A. Geraskina ◽  
M. Yu. Maksimova
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Ischemic Attack

The review shows modern concepts on the role of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients after non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We present an analytical characteristic of all antiplatelet agents that have been studied in randomized controlled trials worldwide. We demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of each agent in monotherapy and in combination. New ideas about the rationality of the use of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in the first 24 hours and no more than 90 days in patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA are discussed. The efficacy and safety of new antiplatelet agents are analyzed. The basic principles of choosing antiplatelet agents in patients after ischemic noncardioembolic stroke/TIA are outlined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document