scholarly journals Drug interactions of antiepileptic drugs Part 2: interaction with drugs of other indication groups

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-87
Author(s):  
Blanka Kořístková ◽  
Milan Grundmann
2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Y. Splinter

Eight new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been approved for use within the United States within the past decade. They are felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide. These afford clinicians with more options to increase efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug interactions with other AEDs and other medications taken for comorbidities are individually discussed for each of these new agents. Drug concentrations are not routinely monitored for these newer agents, and there have been few studies designed to investigate their concentration-effect relationships. For most of these medications, the concentrations observed in responders and nonresponders overlap considerably and levels associated with efficacy are often associated with adverse events, complicating the definition of target ranges. Also, epilepsy manifests itself sporadically causing difficulty in clinically monitoring efficacy of medications. Therapeutic drug monitoring provides for the individualization of treatment for these agents, which is important because they demonstrate significant variability in inter- and intraindividual pharmaco-kinetic properties. Therapeutic drug monitoring also allows for identification of noncompliance, drug interactions, and toxicity. Current knowledge of the relationships between efficacy, toxicity, and drug concentrations is discussed.


1980 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-340
Author(s):  
Emilio Perucca

Interactions with antiepileptic drugs are common and may have important clinical consequences. The physician should always consider carefully the need for and the implications of adding a new drug to any therapeutic regime and should be prepared to think about the possibility of an interaction whenever an unusual response is seen. Serum drug levels can be an invaluable tool in the recognition and the management of most types of interactions, but in no case can they be a substitute for careful observations and evaluation of the patient's symptoms and physical findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhao Yu ◽  
Dong Zhou ◽  
Weijia Jiang ◽  
Jie Mu

Abstract Seizures or epilepsy is one of the common serious complications in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or diagnosed with immune deficiency syndrome, with higher incidence and prevalence than in the general population. Generalized seizures are the most common type in the patients. Opportunistic infections are a stereotypical predisposing factor for seizures in HIV patients, but a variety of pathogenic factors can also be found in these patients, such as metabolic perturbation and drug-drug interactions. The diagnostic criteria for seizures in these patients are the same as those in the general population. As HIV patients with seizures need to take both antivirals and antiepileptic drugs, the risk of drug-drug interactions is greatly increased, and the side effects of drugs may also become more prominent. At present, most experience in antiepileptic drug usage has come from the general population, and there is still a lack of guidance of antiepileptic drug use in special groups such as the HIV-infected people. Unlike the old-generation drugs that involve metabolisms through CYP450, the first-line antiepileptic drugs usually bypass CYP450, thus having less drug-drug interactions. In this review, we summarize the recent research progress on the above-mentioned widely discussed topics and make a prospect on future research direction.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 756-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl W. Bazil

ABSTRACTDuring the past 10 years, there has been a welcome influx of novel agents for the treatment of epilepsy. Many show advantages compared to older agents, including better adverse effect profiles and lack of drug-drug interactions. The sheer number of agents now available makes distinction among them confusing at times. Agents differ in spectrum of action, pharmacokinetic profile (affecting dosing schedule and drug interactions), and titration time. This review highlights the differences between the various new agents and the more traditional antiseizure drugs. Evidence for the widespread use of these compounds outside their indication, particularly for diseases other than epilepsy, is reviewed as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document