scholarly journals Attitudes of Mathematics and Science Educators towardsMistake and Instant Feedback

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-117
Author(s):  
Ali TÜRKDOĞAN ◽  
Ahmet YILDIZ
1964 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-232
Author(s):  
Bert Y. Kersh

It goes almost without saying that discovery learning is in vogue today, especially where mathematics and science educators are concerned. This observation is supported by the substantial curriculum efforts in mathematics and science [1, 2, 3, 4]†, and by the programmatic research endeavors on cognition [5], not to mention the numerous independent efforts by researchers over the country. The reason for tills is not entirely clear to me, however, so I would like to consider what is known about discovery learning that has some basis in experimental research. Specifically, I will attempt to a nswer the question, “What does the student learn when he discovers a principle or generalization in mathematics independently tha t he may not learn when taught these same principles or generalizations directly?” Then I would like to suggest some practical implications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-44
Author(s):  
Catlin M. Pauley ◽  
Aaron J. McKim

Agriculture, food, and/or natural resources (AFNR) content offers a tremendous context for interdisciplinary teaching and learning. Collaboration between AFNR and core content area educators has been recommended to increase interdisciplinarity in school-based AFNR Education; however, existing research lacks an empirical investigation of the relationship between interdisciplinary collaboration and outcomes associated with interdisciplinary teaching in school-based AFNR Education. Therefore, the current study explores the scope of collaboration between AFNR, leadership, mathematics, and science educators and the relationship between collaboration and interdisciplinary teaching in school-based AFNR Education. Findings indicate opportunities to initiate and strengthen interdisciplinary communities of practice through purposeful interactions, especially regarding length of interactions between AFNR and core content area educators. Recommendations for practitioners, teacher educators, and researchers are provided.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
David C. Owens ◽  
Cindi Smith-Walters ◽  
Angela T. Barlow

In this design case, we describe our work to develop a gameful learning design for use in an introductory, under-graduate biology laboratory course for science majors. Our design team included three university-based mathematics and science educators and a biologist responsible for the management of curriculum and instruction in the course under study. The gameful learning design was employed during the four weeks of plant evolutionary life history in-struction. Key challenges to the design and implementation of gameful learning included the adaptation of instruction from teacher-centered to student-centered and establishing novel learning conditions in the eight laboratory sections so as to determine the value of two different elements of game design, repeat-testing and leaderboard with badges.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Jacobs ◽  
Helen Garnier ◽  
Ronald Gallimore ◽  
Hilary Hollingsworth ◽  
Karen Bogard Givvin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document