scholarly journals EVALUASI PENERAPAN KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA (K3) PADA PEKERJAAN FINISHING BANGUNAN DI PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN PENYEDIAAN AIR BAKU SEMARANG BARAT

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Andi Wiguna ◽  
Putri Anggi Permata ◽  
Donny Ariawan
Keyword(s):  

Abstrak Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui antecedents (input), transcription (proses), dan output (hasil) dari penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) pada pekerjaan finishing bangunan di Proyek Pembangunan Penyedian Air Baku Semarang Barat. Metode evaluasi yang digunakan adalah Countenance Stake dengan 3 tahapan meliputi antecedents (input), transcription (proses), dan output. Subyek penelitian adalah pekerja di Proyek Pembangunan Penyediaan Air Baku Semarang Barat. Obyek penelitian adalah penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3). Sumber data yaitu pekerja di Proyek Pembangunan Penyediaan Air Baku Semarang Barat yang berjumlah 30 pekerja dan 3 safety officer. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, pengamatan, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah : (1) antecedent (input) penerapan K3 pada pekerjaan finishing bangunan diproyek kostruksi ditinjau dari penetapan dasar hukum K3 dan pelaksanaan K3 sudah terlaksana sangat baik dilihat dari nilai rata-rata 28.33 yang sudah diterapkan dilapangan. (2) transcription (proses) penerapan K3 pada pekerjaan finishing bangunan diproyek konstruksi ditinjau dari perencanaa K3 dan Penerapan K3 sudah terlaksana dengan baik dilihat dari nilai rata-rata 24.67 yang sudah diterapkan dilapangan. (3) Output penerapan K3 pada pekerjaan finishing bangunan diproyek konstruksi ditinjau dari pemantauan K3 dan evaluasi kinerja K3 sudah terlaksana dengan baik dilihat dari nilai rata-rata 13.33 yang sudah diterapkan dilapangan.   Kata kunci: evaluasi, finishing bangunan, penerapan K3.

Author(s):  
Séan Cronin ◽  
Bridget Kane ◽  
Gavin Doherty

AbstractAs digital imaging is now a common and essential tool in the clinical workflow, it is important to understand the experiences of clinicians with medical imaging systems in order to guide future development. The objective of this paper was to explore health professionals’ experiences, practices and preferences when using Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS), to identify shortcomings in the existing technology and inform future developments. Semi-structured interviews are reported with 35 hospital-based healthcare professionals (3 interns, 11 senior health officers, 6 specialist registrars, 6 consultants, 2 clinical specialists, 5 radiographers, 1 sonographer, 1 radiation safety officer). Data collection took place between February 2019 and December 2020 and all data are analyzed thematically. A majority of clinicians report using PACS frequently (6+ times per day), both through dedicated PACS workstations, and through general-purpose desktop computers. Most clinicians report using basic features of PACS to view imaging and reports, and also to compare current with previous imaging, noting that they rarely use more advanced features, such as measuring. Usability is seen as a problem, including issues related to data privacy. More sustained training would help clinicians gain more value from PACS, particularly less experienced users. While the majority of clinicians report being unconcerned about sterility when accessing digital imaging, clinicians were open to the possibility of touchless operation using voice, and the ability to execute multiple commands with a single voice command would be welcomed.


Author(s):  
Christine E Wamsley ◽  
John Hoopman ◽  
Jeffrey M Kenkel

Abstract Recent advancements in laser technology have led to its expanded utilization in smaller clinical settings and medical spas, particularly for facial rejuvenation and the treatment of other aesthetic concerns. Despite the increasing popularity of this technology, discussion of laser safety programs has remained limited, mostly to operating rooms at larger clinical institutions. Although smaller facilities do not operate at the same capacity as a large hospital or medical center, the requirements for utilizing a laser are no less stringent. Employers must comply with local and federal regulations, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Duty Clause, American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards, and professional recommended practices applicable to their business. Although the laser safety officer (LSO) is often a full-time position within larger facilities, smaller clinical settings and medical spas may be limited in staff number. It is important, therefore, that clinical practices establish laser policies and procedures with consideration of their individual needs and capabilities. In this paper, we will define a laser safety program, highlight basic requirements needed to establish this program, and outline the specific responsibilities of the LSO. To ensure that safe laser practices are being conducted at the healthcare facility, it is imperative that small business owners are aware of these regulations and standards in place for the operation of laser systems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 188-193
Author(s):  
Liam Wilson ◽  
Omer Farooq

Operating theatres are dynamic environments that require multi professional team interactions. Effective team working is essential for efficient delivery of safe patient care. A fire in the operating theatre is a rare but potentially life threatening event for both patients and staff. A rapid and cohesive response from theatre and allied staff including porters, fire safety officer etc is paramount. We delivered a training session that utilised in situ simulation (simulation in workplace). After conducting needs analysis, learning objectives were agreed. After thorough planning, the date and location of the training session were identified. Contingency plans were put in place to ensure that patient care was not compromised at any point. To ensure success, checklists for faculty were devised and adhered to. A medium fidelity manikin with live monitoring was used. The first part of the scenario involved management of a surgical emergency by theatre staff. The second part involved management of a fire in the operating theatre while an emergency procedure was being undertaken. To achieve maximum learning potential, debriefing was provided immediately after each part of the scenario. A fire safety officer was present as a content expert. Latent errors (hidden errors in the workplace, staff knowledge etc) were identified. Malfunctioning of theatre floor windows and staff unawareness about the location of an evacuation site were some of the identified latent errors. Thorough feedback to address these issues was provided to the participants on the day. A detailed report of the training session was given to the relevant departments. This resulted in the equipment faults being rectified. The training session was a very positive experience and helped not only in improving participants’ knowledge, behaviour and confidence but also it made system and environment better equipped.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth E. Cooper

Teaching methods to improve the safety of care for patients has been a priority for nurse educators. This article discusses the student nurses’ use of error reporting tools in the clinical setting, revealing study results completed by the Quality and Safety Officer in a School of Nursing and Health Professions. The aim was to report on the use of safety tools and the perception of safety issues in clinical settings identified by 121 prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Responses suggest that it is challenging for nursing students to report errors and near miss events. Barriers exist for the nursing student. The survey reveals difficulty in reporting but discloses that safety for the patient continues to be a primary concern for the nursing student.


2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Gordon Couger

On the Microscopy ListServer, a thread came up about problems with safety when loading cold traps from ladders. Working from a ladder is not a very safe proposition and being up there with a Dewar full of liquid nitrogen brings the safety officer to attention.An alternative to trying to climb a ladder with a Dewar flask and pour the liquid nitrogen into the trap would be to have a pump for the liquid nitrogen in a Dewar flask on the ground that could be controlled from the top of a ladder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document