scholarly journals Data Protection Laws & Ways to conformity

Author(s):  
رضوان اسخيطة

This Research – Data Protection Laws and Ways to Conformity – talked about the data protection laws in Arabic countries and take the general data protection regulation as research main example. The main purpose of that is to show which point has developed the GDPR and to make a comparison with the legal situation in Arabic countries, the UAE was used as the main example of the Arabic countries in this research due to the advanced development level in technical and legal fields.This research uses mainly the books, electronic contribution and online guides as references and use the comparison as main research method. The new points in the European laws and the expanding of GDPR application to every country in specific cases related to the main discussion points in this research. The research comes to the results with recommendations about the best ways to be conform with the protection laws and the features behind this conformity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (XIX) ◽  
pp. 295-310
Author(s):  
Weronika Kupny

Entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/ EC (General Data Protection Regulation) significantly changed the legal situation of information security administrators. The new institution is a data protection officer. The provisions of the regulation not only changed the name but also the requirements for the person who will perform it in the organization. The main task of the DPO is to provide expert support to the controller and the processor and to monitor compliance with the provisions on personal data protection in cooperation with the supervisory authorities. The importance of the DPO’s function has been strongly emphasized in recital 97 of the preamble to the GDPR. This means that the data protection officer is the person responsible for acting in accordance with the data processing regulations. The independence of DPO is guarantee by its correct placement in the structure of the controller’s organization. As regards the employment of a DPO, the legislator left employers a large dose of freedom. Acquiring specialists dealing in the personal data protection in the company is possible by selecting several options. We can deal with the employment of a stationary specialist or an external consultant. Due to the very wide competence of the DPO, the legislator also provided for the possibility of commissioning the inspector’s tasks to a group of people or a department or an external company.


Author(s):  
Teodora Lalova ◽  
Anastassia Negrouk ◽  
Laurent Dollé ◽  
Sofie Bekaert ◽  
Annelies Debucquoy ◽  
...  

AbstractThis contribution aims to present in a clear and concise manner the intricate legal framework for biobank research in Belgium. In Part 1, we describe the Belgian biobank infrastructure, with a focus on the concept of biobank. In Part 2, we provide an overview of the applicable legal framework, namely the Act of 19 December 2008 on Human Body Material (HBM), and its amendments. Attention is given to an essential piece of self-regulation, namely the Compendium on biobanks issued by the Federal Agency on Medicine Products and Health (FAMPH). Furthermore, we delineate the interplay with relevant data protection rules. Part 3 is dedicated to the main research oversight bodies in the field of biobanking. In Part 4, we provides several examples of the ‘law in context’. In particular, we discuss issues pertaining to presumed consent, processing of personal data associated with HBM, and information provided to the donor of HBM. Finally, Part 5 and 6 addresses the impact of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), suggests lines for further research, and outline the future possibilities for biobanking in Belgium. 


Bioethica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Albena Kuyumdzhieva

The present manuscript examines the new ethics data protection requirements introduced for the research projects funded by the European Programme Horizon 2020.Initially, reference is made to the basic data protection principles introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the derogations permitted in the research field in favor of the science advancement. Although these derogations are subject to a number of safeguards to protect personal data, new ethics requirements are introduced for research projects funded by the European Programme Horizon 2020. The aim of these safeguards is the increased transparency and accountability at the data processing and the consequent enhanced protection of the individuals’ rights. These requirements are geared to the main research ethics postulate, which requires free, voluntary and informed participation of the research subject.Under these new requirements, Horizon 2020 beneficiaries/applicants must comply with a set of predefined standards, reflecting their ethical and legal obligations, provide a detailed and precise description of the technical and organisational measures that will be implemented in order to safeguard the rights of the research participants and also demonstrate their observance. In addition, depending on the type of the data being processed and the data processing techniques, the H2020 applicants/beneficiaries may need to provide a number of additional documents/explanations and implement further measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document