APPLICATION IN RUSSIA OF THE EXPERIENCE OF GERMANY AS AN OECD MEMBER COUNTRY IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL MARKET REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-164
Author(s):  
M. V. CHKHAN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Market ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Market Regulation ◽  
Financial Market Regulation ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
German Model ◽  
Regulation Mechanisms ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
In The Beginning ◽  
Oecd Member Country

The article deals with the issue of the efficiency of financial market regulation by the example of Germany as a member-state of the OECD. In the beginning it is explained how the financial market regulation system in Germany works. Then it is pointed out risks as well as modern challenges and chances of the German model. Summing up it is estimated whether it is reasonable to regulate Russian financial market on German pattern taking into account national specifics of the countries considered. Respective analysis in Germany Russia format is extrapolated to European Union-Eurasian Economic Union area with the conclusion about the possibility to apply some EU regulation mechanisms in the EEU region.

The EU Experience as a Model for the Development of a Single Financial Market Regulation in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustam A. Kasyanov
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Market Regulation ◽  
Member States ◽  
Financial Market Regulation ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Eu

Five countries became members of the Eurasian Economic Union – an international organization of regional economic integration. The Republic of Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Belarus signed the international Treaty in the city of Astana, Kazakhstan on May 29, 2014. The Republic of Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic acceded to the Treaty later. Harmonized regulation of financial markets should be one of the initial areas of cooperation, with the aims of creating a single financial services market within the EAEU and ensuring non-discriminatory access to the national financial markets of each of the member states. The EAEU member states have already entered into the initial stage of developing the Eurasian common market in financial services. A considerable part of the work should be carried out by a supranational financial market regulation body, which is to be established by 2025 according to the EAEU Treaty. Such financial integration in the EAEU has only been in progress for a limited time period and many of the key steps are yet to be done. The existing national-markets development level is highly non-homogeneous and is in need of further development. In such circumstances, a relevant question related to the study of foreign experience arises. European Union started to form its single financial services market in 1973, and since then it has gained certain experience in financial markets integration. This research paper is dedicated to the issue of necessity and possibility of using the EU experience in the course of the EAEU Single market development. The issue will be addressed in terms of political, legal, academic, and practical aspects. The article is of a general, theoretical legal character, which is why emphasis will be placed on legal and doctrinal questions. Special attention will be paid to an analysis of the Eurasian Economic Union Treaty and its Protocols. The work will be based on the academic research and opinions of Russian and foreign authors.

III. Financial Market Regulation in the Post-Financial Services Action Plan Era

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 982-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe McMahon ◽  
Niamh Moloney
Keyword(s):  
Financial Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Market Regulation ◽  
Financial Market Regulation ◽  
Reform Agenda ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Best Execution

After a hectic period of law reform, which has also provoked major governance reforms in the form of significantly increased levels of transparency and market consultation and major institutional innovations (with allied accountability and governance risks), the 1999 Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP)1 has now been completed. It has radically transformed the regulatory landscape for financial services in the EC, and set a seal on the recharacterization of EC financial services law from a minimum harmonization-based market construction regime to a highly interventionist and increasingly sophisti-cated market regulation system. In particular, the coincidence of legislative reform under the FSAP with the development of a new institutional process for law-making, which has rapidly become embedded in the financial market architecture (the Lamfalussy process),2 produced a reform agenda of immense depth and range. The FSAP period has also seen the use and development of a wide range of regulatory tools in EC financial services policy in line with the growing sophistication of the regulatory regime. While disclosure has long been a key policy tool of EC financial services law, the FSAP saw a closer focus on conflict of interest management across the financial sector, on more interventionist controls such as transparency, suitability, and best execution requirements, and on calibrating regulation to different investor profiles and different market risks. This article considers a selection of key recent developments.

The Capital Market Authority Effectiveness in the Regulation of Financial Markets perspectives from the financial sector actors

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (11) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Charles Kombo Okioga
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Capital Markets ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Regulation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Market Regulation ◽  
Financial Market Regulation ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
New Business

Capital Market Authority in Kenya is in a development phase in order to be effective in the regulation of the financial markets. The market participants and the regulators are increasingly adopting international standards in order to make the capital markets in sync with those of developed markets. New products are being introduced and new business lines are being established. The Capital Markets Authority (Regulator) is constantly reviewing existing regulations and recommending changes to regulate the market properly. Business lines and activities are being harmonized by market participants to provide a one stop solution in order to meet the financial and securities services needs of the investors. The convergence of business lines and activities of market intermediaries gives rise to the diversity of a firm’s business operations to meet multiplicity of regulations that its activities are subject to. The methodology used in this study was designed to examine the relationship between capital markets Authority effective regulation and the performance of the financial markets. The study used correlation design, the study population consisted of 30 employees in financial institutions regulated by Capital Markets Authority and 80 investors. The study found out that effective financial market regulation has a significant relationship with the financial market performance indicated by (r=0.571, p<0.01) and (r=0.716, p≤0.01, the study recommended a further research on the factors that hinder effective financial regulation by the Capital Markets Authority.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document