scholarly journals NEO-ZIONIST FRONTIER LANDSCAPES IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Izhak SCHNELL ◽  
Ben-Israel ARNON

Immediately after the 1967 war and the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza the national religious youngsters (Gush Emmunim settlers) reached out to settle the new frontier of the biblical places. By thus, they have developed a Messianic myth. The interpretation of Gush-Emmunim settlers’ experience of landscapes reveals a complex and contradictory structure of sense of space. Settlers’ mythical sense of space may be understood in two strata - imagined and material. The imagined stratum is conceived mainly in transcendental romantic terms while the material is reified according to classic conceptions. Two main contradictions are outstanding: first, between the romantic representation of Jewish landscapes and the classic representation of Palestinian landscapes in the imagined stratum; second, between the romantic representation of the Jewish home space in the imagined stratum and the classical representation of the suburban Jewish home landscape in the material stratum. The first contradiction is inherent in frontier societies as a means to pseudo-rationalize the colonisation of the land, although in general there may be a mixture of romantic and classic attitudes towards the natives. The settlers pioneering myth is highly subsidised by the government and aggressively backed by military force. This enables them to tolerate the surrounding fear, antagonism and hatred. Thus, the landscape they build represents power and domination with no regard to local nature and to the Palestinian landscapes that are perceived by the settlers as part of it.

Author(s):  
Dov Waxman

Why are the West Bank and Gaza Strip considered “occupied territories”? The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has always been fought with words as well as weapons. The public rhetoric of both sides, and their respective supporters, has been deliberately formulated to discredit the other side’s claims, delegitimize...


Race & Class ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Usher

Azmi Bishara, a Palestinian who is an Israeli citizen, has long been involved in the struggles of the Arab minority in Israel and against the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. He has also been active on the Israeli Left. A lecturer in philosophy at Birzeit University, he writes regularly in both the Israeli and the Arabic press in Israel and the occupied territories.


Author(s):  
David Kretzmer ◽  
Yaël Ronen

This chapter examines the Court’s decisions on the applicability of the belligerent law of occupation to the Occupied Territories and the enforcement of that body of law by the Court. It explains the distinction the Court has drawn between customary international law and treaty law. The chapter shows that the Court regards the Hague Regulations as customary law but has not taken the same approach to the Fourth Geneva Convention. The Government of Israel adopted the view that the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the West Bank is questionable, but undertook to respect the Convention’s humanitarian provisions. The chapter shows how the Court has neither accepted nor rejected the government’s view and has left the Convention’s formal applicability as an open question. Nevertheless the Court regularly relies on the Convention and interprets is provisions. The chapter maintains that in interpreting the Convention the Court has vacillated between different theories of interpretation but has consistently adopted the interpretation that favours the government’s position in the particular cases before it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document