scholarly journals Endomorphism Breaking in Graphs

10.37236/3073 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfried Imrich ◽  
Rafał Kalinowski ◽  
Florian Lehner ◽  
Monika Pilśniak
Keyword(s):  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Vertex Coloring ◽  
Distinguishing Number

We introduce the endomorphism distinguishing number $D_e(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the least cardinal $d$ such that $G$ has a vertex coloring with $d$ colors that is only preserved by the trivial endomorphism. This generalizes the notion of the distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$, which is defined for automorphisms instead of endomorphisms.As the number of endomorphisms can vastly exceed the number of automorphisms, the new concept opens challenging problems, several of which are presented here. In particular, we investigate relationships between $D_e(G)$ and the endomorphism motion of a graph $G$, that is, the least possible number of vertices moved by a nontrivial endomorphism of $G$. Moreover, we extend numerous results about the distinguishing number of finite and infinite graphs to the endomorphism distinguishing number.

scholarly journals Bounding the Distinguishing Number of Infinite Graphs and Permutation Groups

10.37236/3046 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M. Smith ◽  
Mark E. Watkins
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Automorphism Groups ◽  
Cardinal Number ◽  
Infinite Graph ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Finite Radius ◽  
Locally Finite ◽  
Distinguishing Number ◽  
Identity Permutation ◽  
Imprimitive Group

A group of permutations $G$ of a set $V$ is $k$-distinguishable if there exists a partition of $V$ into $k$ cells such that only the identity permutation in $G$ fixes setwise all of the cells of the partition. The least cardinal number $k$ such that $(G,V)$ is $k$-distinguishable is its distinguishing number $D(G,V)$. In particular, a graph $\Gamma$ is $k$-distinguishable if its automorphism group $\rm{Aut}(\Gamma)$ satisfies $D(\rm{Aut}(\Gamma),V\Gamma)\leq k$.Various results in the literature demonstrate that when an infinite graph fails to have some property, then often some finite subgraph is similarly deficient. In this paper we show that whenever an infinite connected graph $\Gamma$ is not $k$-distinguishable (for a given cardinal $k$), then it contains a ball of finite radius whose distinguishing number is at least $k$. Moreover, this lower bound cannot be sharpened, since for any integer $k \geq 3$ there exists an infinite, locally finite, connected graph $\Gamma$ that is not $k$-distinguishable but in which every ball of finite radius is $k$-distinguishable.In the second half of this paper we show that a large distinguishing number for an imprimitive group $G$ is traceable to a high distinguishing number either of a block of imprimitivity or of the induced action by $G$ on the corresponding system of imprimitivity. An immediate application is to automorphism groups of infinite imprimitive graphs. These results are companion to the study of the distinguishing number of infinite primitive groups and graphs in a previous paper by the authors together with T. W. Tucker.

scholarly journals Distinguishability of Locally Finite Trees

10.37236/947 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Watkins ◽  
Xiangqian Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Chromatic Number ◽  
Inverse Image ◽  
Vertex Coloring ◽  
Finite Tree ◽  
Locally Finite ◽  
Distinguishing Number ◽  
Nonidentity Element ◽  
Locally Countable ◽  
Proper Vertex

The distinguishing number $\Delta(X)$ of a graph $X$ is the least positive integer $n$ for which there exists a function $f:V(X)\to\{0,1,2,\cdots,n-1\}$ such that no nonidentity element of $\hbox{Aut}(X)$ fixes (setwise) every inverse image $f^{-1}(k)$, $k\in\{0,1,2,\cdots,n-1\}$. All infinite, locally finite trees without pendant vertices are shown to be 2-distinguishable. A proof is indicated that extends 2-distinguishability to locally countable trees without pendant vertices. It is shown that every infinite, locally finite tree $T$ with finite distinguishing number contains a finite subtree $J$ such that $\Delta(J)=\Delta(T)$. Analogous results are obtained for the distinguishing chromatic number, namely the least positive integer $n$ such that the function $f$ is also a proper vertex-coloring.

scholarly journals Distinguishing Infinite Graphs

10.37236/954 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfried Imrich ◽  
Sandi Klavžar ◽  
Vladimir Trofimov
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Cardinal Number ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Cartesian Products ◽  
Distinguishing Number

The distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the least cardinal number $\aleph$ such that $G$ has a labeling with $\aleph$ labels that is only preserved by the trivial automorphism. We show that the distinguishing number of the countable random graph is two, that tree-like graphs with not more than continuum many vertices have distinguishing number two, and determine the distinguishing number of many classes of infinite Cartesian products. For instance, $D(Q_{n}) = 2$, where $Q_{n}$ is the infinite hypercube of dimension ${n}$.

scholarly journals Bounds for Distinguishing Invariants of Infinite Graphs

10.37236/6362 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfried Imrich ◽  
Rafał Kalinowski ◽  
Monika Pilśniak ◽  
Mohammad Hadi Shekarriz
Keyword(s):  
Chromatic Number ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Chromatic Index ◽  
Distinguishing Number ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Edge Colourings ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Vertex Colouring

We consider infinite graphs. The distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of colours in a vertex colouring of $G$ that is preserved only by the trivial automorphism. An analogous invariant for edge colourings is called the distinguishing index, denoted by $D'(G)$. We prove that $D'(G)\leq D(G)+1$. For proper colourings, we study relevant invariants called the distinguishing chromatic number $\chi_D(G)$, and the distinguishing chromatic index $\chi'_D(G)$, for vertex and edge colourings, respectively. We show that $\chi_D(G)\leq 2\Delta(G)-1$ for graphs with a finite maximum degree $\Delta(G)$, and we obtain substantially lower bounds for some classes of graphs with infinite motion. We also show that $\chi'_D(G)\leq \chi'(G)+1$, where $\chi'(G)$ is the chromatic index of $G$, and we prove a similar result $\chi''_D(G)\leq \chi''(G)+1$ for proper total colourings. A number of conjectures are formulated.

scholarly journals Distinguishing Number of Countable Homogeneous Relational Structures

10.37236/292 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Laflamme ◽  
L. Nguyen Van Thé ◽  
N. Sauer
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Random Graph ◽  
Directed Graphs ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Finite Graphs ◽  
Relational Structures ◽  
Distinguishing Number ◽  
Homogeneous Structures

The distinguishing number of a graph $G$ is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $G$ has a labeling of its vertices with $r$ labels for which there is no non-trivial automorphism of $G$ preserving these labels. In early work, Michael Albertson and Karen Collins computed the distinguishing number for various finite graphs, and more recently Wilfried Imrich, Sandi Klavžar and Vladimir Trofimov computed the distinguishing number of some infinite graphs, showing in particular that the Random Graph has distinguishing number 2. We compute the distinguishing number of various other finite and countable homogeneous structures, including undirected and directed graphs, and posets. We show that this number is in most cases two or infinite, and besides a few exceptions conjecture that this is so for all primitive homogeneous countable structures.

scholarly journals The Distinguishing Index of Infinite Graphs

10.37236/3933 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Izak Broere ◽  
Monika Pilśniak
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Infinite Graph ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Distinguishing Number ◽  
General Bound ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Edge Colouring

The  distinguishing index $D^\prime(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the least cardinal $d$ such that $G$ has an edge colouring with $d$ colours that is only preserved by the trivial automorphism. This is similar to the notion of the distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$, which is defined with respect to vertex colourings.We derive several bounds for infinite graphs, in particular, we prove the general bound $D^\prime(G)\leq\Delta(G)$ for an arbitrary infinite graph. Nonetheless,  the distinguishing index is at most two for many countable graphs, also for the infinite random graph and for uncountable tree-like graphs.We also investigate the concept of the motion of edges and its relationship with the Infinite Motion Lemma. 

Model-Checking of Infinite Graphs Defined by Graph Grammars

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
O BURKART ◽  
Y QUEMENER
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Infinite Graphs ◽  
Graph Grammars

scholarly journals Graphoidally independent infinite graphs

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Purnima Gupta ◽  
Deepti Jain
Keyword(s):  
Infinite Graphs

scholarly journals Indirect identification of horizontal gene transfer

2021 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Schaller ◽  
Manuel Lafond ◽  
Peter F. Stadler ◽  
Nicolas Wieseke ◽  
Marc Hellmuth
Keyword(s):  
Gene Transfer ◽  
Horizontal Gene Transfer ◽  
Polynomial Time ◽  
Divergence Time ◽  
Recognition Algorithm ◽  
Vertex Coloring ◽  
Implicit Methods ◽  
Colored Graphs ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Complete Multipartite

AbstractSeveral implicit methods to infer horizontal gene transfer (HGT) focus on pairs of genes that have diverged only after the divergence of the two species in which the genes reside. This situation defines the edge set of a graph, the later-divergence-time (LDT) graph, whose vertices correspond to genes colored by their species. We investigate these graphs in the setting of relaxed scenarios, i.e., evolutionary scenarios that encompass all commonly used variants of duplication-transfer-loss scenarios in the literature. We characterize LDT graphs as a subclass of properly vertex-colored cographs, and provide a polynomial-time recognition algorithm as well as an algorithm to construct a relaxed scenario that explains a given LDT. An edge in an LDT graph implies that the two corresponding genes are separated by at least one HGT event. The converse is not true, however. We show that the complete xenology relation is described by an rs-Fitch graph, i.e., a complete multipartite graph satisfying constraints on the vertex coloring. This class of vertex-colored graphs is also recognizable in polynomial time. We finally address the question “how much information about all HGT events is contained in LDT graphs” with the help of simulations of evolutionary scenarios with a wide range of duplication, loss, and HGT events. In particular, we show that a simple greedy graph editing scheme can be used to efficiently detect HGT events that are implicitly contained in LDT graphs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document