scholarly journals Multivariate Assessment of Marginal Fit of Three Types of Dental Crowns Using Three Scanning Systems for CAD-CAM Technology - in vitro Pilot Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-379
Author(s):  
Smaranda Buduru ◽  
Anca Mesaros ◽  
Cristian Culcitchi ◽  
Marioara Moldovan ◽  
Doina Prodan ◽  
...  

The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare if there are any differences in the marginal fit of crowns fabricated by CAD/CAM technique. We used three different types of materials (two types of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) provided by two different manufacturers and one type of hybrid ceramic) and three different types of impressions: intraoral scanning, model scanning and conventional impression scanning. The crowns were subsequently measured with an electronic microscope at 1000X. Our results showed better results for the hybrid ceramic. The differences between the PMMA were not significant. There were no statistic differences with the ANOVA analysis between the scanning methods. Best combination in terms of marginal fit was found with hybrid ceramic and intraoral scanning.

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 3136-3141
Author(s):  
Marius Negucioiu ◽  
Daniela Popa ◽  
Daniela Condor ◽  
Cristian Culcitchi ◽  
Doina Prodan ◽  
...  

Our aim in this follow-up in vitro study was to compare differences in marginal fit of inlays fabricated by CAD/CAM technique, using 2 different types of materials (one type of ceramic and one type of hybrid ceramic) and 2 different types of scanning: intraoral scanning (we use quotation marks because of the lack of a true intraoral environment) and model scanning, both performed on a Frasaco Typodont model. Marginal fit measurement was carried out with an electronic microscope at 1000x magnification. Our results proved to be better in the case of the ceramic we used, while model scanning proved to be more accurate than intraoral scanning. The best combination we obtained in terms of marginal fit was found when using ceramic and model scanning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 828
Author(s):  
A Robaian ◽  
A Maawadh ◽  
ZI Alghomlas ◽  
AM Alqahtani ◽  
TA Alothman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivasan Jayaraman ◽  
BalajiN Rajan ◽  
Baburajan Kandhasamy ◽  
Ilangkumaran Rajakumaran

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-410
Author(s):  
Kamel Earar ◽  
Alexandru Andrei Iliescu ◽  
Gabriela Popa ◽  
Andrei Iliescu ◽  
Ioana Rudnic ◽  
...  

CAD/CAM procedures are increasingly used to the manufacturing of 3D-designed PMMA interim dental crowns. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the internal fit of interim PMMA crowns fabricated by subtractive versus additive CAD/CAM procedures. Starting from a Co-Cr CAD/CAM master abutment model, 20 standardized dental models of dental stone were done by double impression technique. Subsequently two groups of interim PMMA interim crowns, each of them having 10 specimens, were CAM obtained either by milling or 3D printing, using Exocad software package, milling machine Rolland DWX-50, and the 3D printer MoonRay S 100 respectively. An electronic digital caliper Powerfix Profi+ was used for measurements of the chrome cobalt abutment and crowns inner diameter in 4 directions (mesial-distal gingival, buccal-lingual gingival, mesial-distal occlusal, and buccal-lingual occlusal). The null hypothesis that the internal dimensional accuracy of interim PMMA crowns fabricated by DLP additive method would not be different compared to those obtained by milling procedure was rejected since the printed PMMA interim crowns were more accurate. This study concluded that the milled PMMA interim crowns show larger internal dimensional variations than the 3D printed ones. However, the fit variation among interim crowns fabricated by both procedures was statistically non significant, so that both CAM technologies may be equally used in manufacturing process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 223.e1-223.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Margarida Carrilho Baltazar Vaz ◽  
José Fausto Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Salim Duqum ◽  
Christian Brenes ◽  
Gustavo Mendonca ◽  
Thiago Almedia Prado Naves Carneiro ◽  
Lyndon F. Cooper

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 9p
Author(s):  
Manar Ahmed El-Mahdy ◽  
Ahmed Khaled Aboelfadl ◽  
Marwa Mohamed Wahsh

ABSTRACTObjective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of laminate veneers made of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate with two thicknesses using different CAD/CAM systems. Material and methods: 42 Laminate veneers milled from zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate were divided into three main groups according to milling machine used into: group X5, laminate veneers fabricated by inLab MCX5 milling machine; group CM, laminate veneers fabricated by Ceramill motion 2; and group XL, laminate veneers fabricated by inLab MCXL. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to veneer thickness into: subgroup I, 0.5 mm thickness laminate veneers and subgroup II, 0.3 mm thickness laminate veneers. The marginal fit was measured using stereomicroscope. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Comparisons of main and simple effects were done utilizing Bonferroni correction (P ? 0.05). Results: The mean (±SD) highest marginal discrepancy was recorded in subgroup BII at 85.45±1.82 µm while the least mean marginal discrepancy was recorded in subgroup AI 71.24±2.64 µm. Conclusion: Both thicknesses (0.5 mm thickness and 0.3 mm thickness) and all tested CAD/CAM systems produced zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate laminate veneers with clinically acceptable marginal gaps; however, the closed CAD/CAM systems produced veneers with superior marginal fit than open systems at 0.3 mm thickness. The CAD/CAM system with the 5-axis milling machine produced the best marginal fit with 0.5 mm thickness. KEYWORDS Marginal fit; Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate; Laminate veneers; CAD/CAM; Milling machines. RESUMOObjetivo: O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar a adaptação marginal de facetas laminadas de silicato de lítio reforçado com zircônia com duas espessuras, utilizando diferentes sistemas CAD / CAM. Material e métodos: 42 facetas laminadas fresadas a partir de silicato de lítio reforçado com zircônia foram divididos em três grupos principais de acordo com a fresadora usada em: grupo X5, facetas laminadas fabricados pela fresadora inLab MCX5; grupo CM, facetas laminadas fabricados por Ceramill motion 2; e grupo XL, facetas laminadas fabricados pelo inLab MCXL. Cada grupo foi dividido em dois subgrupos, de acordo com a espessura do laminado, em: subgrupo I, facetas laminadas com 0,5 mm de espessura e subgrupo II, facetas laminadas com espessura de 0,3 mm. A adaptação marginal foi medida usando estereomicroscópio. Os resultados foram tabulados e analisados estatisticamente usando o teste ANOVA de dois fatores seguido pelo teste post hoc de Tukey. Comparações dos efeitos principais e simples foram realizadas utilizando a correção de Bonferroni (P ?0,05). Resultados: A maior discrepância marginal média (± DP) foi registrada no subgrupo BII em 85,45 ± 1,82 µm, enquanto a menor discrepância marginal média foi registrada no subgrupo AI 71,24 ± 2,64 µm. Conclusão: Ambas as espessuras (0,5 mm e 0,3 mm) e todos os sistemas CAD / CAM testados produziram facetas de laminado de silicato de lítio reforçadas com zircônia com lacunas clinicamente aceitáveis. No entanto, os sistemas CAD / CAM fechados produziam facetas com adaptação marginal superior aos sistemas abertos com 0,3 mm de espessura. O sistema CAD / CAM com a fresadora de 5 eixos produziu a melhor adaptação marginal com 0,5 mm de espessura.PALAVRAS-CHAVE Adaptação marginal; Silicato de lítio reforçado com zircônia; Facetas laminados; CAD / CAM; Fresadoras.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document