scholarly journals In vitro Study of the Structure and Adhesive Interface in Direct Restorations with Experimental Nanocomposite Materials and Adhesive Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 620-625
Author(s):  
Anca Porumb ◽  
Adrian Almasi ◽  
Liana Todor ◽  
Cristian Adrian Ratiu ◽  
Gabriela Ciavoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Importance ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Nanocomposite Materials ◽  
Variable Number ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Chemistry Research ◽  
Self Etch

Using nanotechnology to produce composite materials it has been possible to obtain materials with similar or better mechanical properties than previous generation of microhybrids, and with exceptional aesthetics and chandelier due to the particularities of nanomaterials. At the same time, the improvement of adhesive techniques to enamel and dentin allowed the expansion of the area of direct composite restorations with a better prognostic over time.Eight carie-free molars were used and each of them was prepared with two class II cavities, which were filled using the C13 and C20 nanocomposites and the A1 and A2 experimental adhesive systems prepared at the Raluca Ripan Chemistry Research Institute. The teeth were divided into four groups of two teeth each, depending on the adhesive system and the composite material used. Scanning electron microscopy images (SEM) have described the adhesive interface and structure characteristics for the two nanocomposite materials and for the two studied adhesive systems.The studied nanocomposites have a variable number of porosities and air bubbles, with a clinical importance which is yet hard to establish.The experimental adhesives used produce a good interface and infiltration of the smear-layer but have not been visualized inside the dentinal canals.In vitro studies are necessary to evaluate the durability of adhesion in the case of self-etch adhesives in one or two steps.

scholarly journals In Vitro Study of the Structure and Adhesive Interface in Direct Restorations with Commercial Nanocomposite Materials

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Adrian Almasi ◽  
Liana Todor ◽  
Cristian Adrian Ratiu ◽  
Ramona Amina Popovici ◽  
Codruta Victoria Tigmeanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Characterization ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Nanocomposite Materials ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Interface

The purpose of this study was: Structural characterization of two commercial nanocomposite materials (Premise ™/Kerr Corp and Tetric EvoCeram�/ Ivoclar-Vivadent); Evaluation of the marginal adaptation and adhesive interface achieved with two commercial adhesive systems (Optibond SoloPlus ™/Kerr Corp and G-Bond ™/GC). Investigation was done using electronic scanning microscopy (SEM).

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Different Pulp Capping Materials to Dental Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 232020682199798
Author(s):  
Sema Yazici Akbiyik ◽  
Elif Pınar Bakir ◽  
S¸eyhmus Bakir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Pulp Capping ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fracture Types ◽  
Self Etch

Aim: To evaluate the bond strengths of pulp capping materials (Dycal, ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, TheraCal LC, Calcimol LC, and ApaCal ART) and different adhesive systems (Gluma 2 Bond, Clearfil SE Protect, Gluma Self Etch, Clearfil S 3 Bond Plus, Gluma Bond Universal, Clearfil S 3 Bond Universal). Materials and Methods: Two hundred fifty-two acrylic blocks were prepared in which cylindrical cavities of 4 × 2 mm 3 were formed. Pulp capping materials were placed in the cavities. Different adhesive systems were applied to each pulp capping material group. After applying the composite resin, the shear bond strength (SBS) values of the specimens were determined in the Instron test device. Fracture types were evaluated using a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Shapiro–Wilk’s and Kruskal–Wallis H test. Results: There is a statistically significant difference between pulp capping materials in terms of SBS values ( P < .05). Dycal’s SBS was found significantly lower than other materials, and the highest bond strength was observed in Calcimol LC material. Although there is no statistically significant difference ( P > .05) between the adhesive agent groups in terms of SBS, Gluma 2 Bond showed the highest bond strength value. Conclusion: In traditional pulp capping materials such as Dycal, MTA, and Biodentine, using a two-step self-etch adhesive system can result in higher bond strength values. In resin-based TheraCal LC,, ApaCal ART, and Calcimol LC materials, it may be recommended to use a two-step etch and rinse adhesive system.

scholarly journals Quantitative evaluation of microleakage in class V cavities using one-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar ◽  
Alex José Souza dos Santos ◽  
José Roberto Lovadino
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Root Dentin

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate quantitatively the microleakage in class V cavities restored with one-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems with and without previous acid etching. Two one-bottle adhesive systems (Single Bond and Prime & Bond 2.1) and one self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Mega Bond) were used in this study. One hundred and twenty sound human premolar teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups, and 20 class V restorations were prepared in the root dentin to test each bonding system. Each bonding system was used with and without acid etching. Specimens were prepared, dyed with 2% methylene blue, sectioned, triturated, and evaluated with an absorbance spectrophotometer test in order to quantify the infiltrated dye. Results were statistically evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test. No statistically significant differences were found among the adhesive systems when no etching agent was used. However, the Single Bond adhesive system showed statistically significant lower microleakage means than Clearfil Mega Bond and Prime & Bond 2.1 when 37% phosphoric acid was used. Single Bond and Clearfil Mega Bond adhesive systems presented similar behavior when the manufacturers' instructions were followed.

scholarly journals A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azam Nahvi ◽  
Alireza Razavian ◽  
Hoorieh Abedi ◽  
Jamshid Yazdani Charati
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Objective: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. Settings and Design: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. The first group received Acid etch + Clinpro sealant, the second group received Acid etch + Single bond 2 + Clinpro sealant, the third group received Single bond universal (self-etching bonding) + Clinpro sealant, and the fourth group received prevent seal self-etching sealant. Materials and Methods: An incision was made on the teeth after they were immersed in methylene blue 5%. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope and the dye penetration rate was measured based on the Williams and Winter criteria. Statistical Analysis Used: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis in SPSS-18 (P < 0.05). Results: Group 1 which was treated with the conventional technique (acid + fissure sealant) had the highest rate of microleakage compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that the use of bonding results in a significant reduction in the microleakage of fissure sealants. The microleakage caused when using self-etch fissure sealant was not different from that caused by the use of the conventional method.

scholarly journals Influence of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Batista Franco ◽  
Lawrence Gonzaga Lopes ◽  
Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino ◽  
José Carlos Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Steel Matrix ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Influence Of Ph

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin (Adaptic - AD), by means of tensile bond strength testing. The adhesive systems tested were: ARM, Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB), Scotchbond Multi Purpose (SMP) and Single Bond (SB). Bond strength at the resin/adhesive system/resin interface was assessed. Five groups (n=5) were formed, according to following configuration: G1: AD/ARM/AD; G2: AD/PB/AD; G3: AD/SMP/AD; G4: AD/SB/AD; G5: AD/AD (no adhesive). A two-mold stainless steel matrix with a cone-shaped opening (1-mm-thick; 4 mm in diameter) was used to obtain resin discs. AD resin was inserted into the first mold, left-self curing and an adhesive layer was applied onto resin surface and light-cured. The second mold was assembled over the first and was filled with the resin. After 10 min, this setting was loaded in tension in a universal testing machine running at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Bond strength means (kgf) were: G1: 15.23 ± 4.1; G2: 0.00 ± 0.0; G3: 16.96 ± 2.4; G4: 10.08 ± 2.7; G5: 15.44 ± 0.9. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between G2-G1; G2-G3; G2-G4; G4-G1; G4-G3. The systems with the lowest pHs (PB and SB) yielded the lowest bond strength. The findings of this in vitro study demostrates that the pH of adhesive systems influences the polymerization and bond strength of chemically cured resin materials. The low pH simplified adhesive systems showed distinct degrees of incompatibility with the chemically cured resin, when compared to the conventional adhesive systems.

scholarly journals The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeeshan H Ahmad ◽  
Sukumaran Anil ◽  
Alaa El Araby ◽  
Mohammad D Al Amri
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
The Self ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Lower Performance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the influence of Expasyl® gingival retraction paste on the shear bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Materials and methods Twenty-four specimens of extracted, caries-free, sound human molars were used in this study. The molars were then cut vertically into halves through the buccal and lingual cusps. Forty-eight specimens were divided into four groups (total-etch, total-etch with Expasyl application, self-etch, self-etch with Expasyl application) and the shear bond strength was tested. Results Expasyl significantly reduced the shear bond strength of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. The self-etch system showed relatively lower performance compared with the total-etch adhesive system. The shear bond strength values of the total-etch adhesive without Expasyl showed the highest bond strength (21.48 ± 2.89), while the self-etching group adhesive treated with Expasyl showed the lowest shear bond strength value (14.89 ± 1.81). Conclusion From the observations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the use of Expasyl® gingival retraction system can negatively affect bond strength of adhesives. The total-etch system showed better compatibility to the Expasyl gingival retraction system than the self-etch. How to cite this article Al Baker AMA, El Araby A, Al Amri MD, Sukumaran A. The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5):335-339.

scholarly journals Microleakage study of three adhesive systems

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Gallego Arias ◽  
Inger Teixeira Campos ◽  
Luiz André Freire Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
Dwell Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
The Self ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Molar Teeth

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the efficacy of three hydrophilic dentin adhesive systems to reduce class II restoration microleakage. A total of 60 human molar teeth were used in which two box cavities were made on the distal and mesial surfaces, with a cervical margin in dentin. These cavities were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 40 each), according to adhesive system tested: G1: OptiBond SOLO®; G2: Amalgambond Plus®; G3: Etch & Prime 3.0®. The cavities were restored with the composite resin Z-100®. The groups were thermocycled 2000 times (5 ± 1ºC and 55 ± 1ºC) with a dwell time of 1 min. The teeth were then immersed in 2% methylene blue, pH 7.0, for 4 h, sectioned and observed with a stereomicroscope MEIJI 2000 (35X). The evaluation was made using scores (0-4) and the results were expressed through the sum of the ranks. G1 = 1994.00; G2 = 2294.00; G3 = 2972.00. The three groups were significantly different. The self-etching adhesive system Etch & Prime 3.0 was less effective in preventing microleakage. The OptiBond SOLO adhesive was the most effective in reducing microleakage in dentin margins when compared with Amalgambond Plus and Etch & Prime 3.0.

scholarly journals Analysis of micro-shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive systems with dentine: An in vitro study

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar Shakya ◽  
Rajeev Kumar Singh ◽  
Anjani Kumar Pathak ◽  
Balendra Pratap Singh ◽  
Anil Chandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document