scholarly journals CONCERNING THE PROBLEM OF IDENTIFYING THE SСYTHIAN CENTERS OF POWER IN EASTERN EUROPE IN THE VII—VI centuries BC

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
S. V. Маkhortykh
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
The North ◽  
Military Elite

The analysis of the Scythian burials of the 7th—6th centuries BC in the south of Eastern Europe, allowed the author to identify several groups of monuments located in the North Caucasus and Ukrainian forest-steppe: Central Ciscaucasian, Kuban, Posulsko-Vorsklinskaya and Kyiv-Cherkasskaya. The clusters of kurgans associated with these groups include burials of the Scythian military elite together with large «royal» tumuli.

BIODIVERSITY OF WILD RUMINANTS HELMINTHS IN ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS

2021 ◽  
pp. 121-124
Author(s):  
M.M. ZUBAIROVA ◽  
A.M. ATAEV ◽  
N.T. KARSAKOV ◽  
T.N. ASHURBEKOVA ◽  
A.N. KHASAEV
Keyword(s):  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
Wild Ruminants ◽  
The North

scholarly journals New records of megachilid bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) from the North Caucasus and the south of European Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-331
Author(s):  
A.V. Fateryga ◽  
◽  
M.Yu. Proshchalykin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
New Records ◽  
Distinct Species ◽  
European Part ◽  
European Russia ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
The North ◽  
The Family ◽  
European Part Of Russia ◽  
South Of European Russia

New data on 22 species of bees of the family Megachilidae from the North Caucasus and the south of European Russia are reported. Six species are new to Russia: Hoplitis curvipes (Morawitz, 1871), Osmia cinerea Warncke, 1988, O. ligurica Morawitz, 1868, O. cyanoxantha Pérez, 1879, Protosmia glutinosa (Giraud, 1871), and Coelioxys mielbergi Morawitz, 1880. Hoplitis turcestanica (Dalla Torre, 1896), sp. resurr. is treated as a distinct species, not a junior synonym of H. caularis (Morawitz, 1875). Megachile albocristata Smith, 1853 and M. alborufa Friese, 1911 are listed instead of previously recorded M. lefebvrei (Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1841) and M. pyrenaica (Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1841), respectively. Fourteen new regional records are reported: seven species are new to the North Caucasus, five ones are new to the south of European Russia, and two species are new to the European part of Russia as a whole. The numbers of megachilid bee species currently known in Russia, the North Caucasus, and the south of European Russia are 217, 130, and 71, respectively. The lectotype of Osmia proxima Morawitz, 1875 is designated.

HELMINTS OF DOMESTIC RUMINANTS AND SPECIAL FEA TERES OF THEIR DISTRIBUTION IN THE SOUTH-EAST REGION OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 126-132
Author(s):  
M.M. ZUBAIROVA ◽  
◽  
A. M. ATAEV ◽  
N.T. KARSAKOV ◽  
Z.M. DGAMBULATOV ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
The North ◽  
East Region ◽  
Domestic Ruminants

scholarly journals Chronological Indicators of Post-Hunnic Steppe Antiquities in Eastern Europe

2019 ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Michel Kazanski
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Middle Ages ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Political Orientation ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
The North ◽  
Sedentary Population ◽  
The Crimea ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Economic Ties

The article discusses chronologically important things from the finds belonging to the steppe nomads of the Post-Hunnic periods in Eastern Europe, from the Urals to the Lower Danube (mid 5th – mid 6th centuries): weapons, horse equipment, elements of costume, jewelry. It should be noted that very similar types of these things prevail across the entire steppe area during the Post-Hunnic time, indicating the steppe nomad cultural homogeneity, regardless of their origin and ethnicity. Some things from the steppe graves of the time have a wider date and exist until the 7th century. Some things are typical for the early stage of the Post-Hunnic horizon, i.e. time around the middle – the second half of the 5th century. On the other hand, some things mark the end of the Post-Hunnic era and date back to the middle or second half of the 6th century. The date for most of the things examined here is established by external analogies, known in vast territories, which include the Western European and Balkan-Danubian regions. There the reasoned chronology of antiquities of the 5th – 6th centuries was developed, which is based on numerous coin finds and also on dendrochronology. Equally important for the chronology of steppe antiquities are analogs derived from the monuments of the sedentary population of the steppe borderlands, where there are numerous closed complexes. First of all, these are monuments of the North Caucasus, and the Crimea, on the chronology of which there are numerous studies. Some of the things we have considered belong to the prestigious “princely” culture and are of Mediterranean or Asian origin and thus reflect the cultural, military and political, economic ties of the steppe population and political orientation of the steppe “princely” elites in the Early Middle Ages.

scholarly journals FORMATION OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION OF UKRAINE IN COSSACK TIME. STEPPE IMPACT

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-276
Author(s):  
T. O. Rudych
Keyword(s):  
Steppe Zone ◽  
Broad Face ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
Late Medieval ◽  
The North ◽  
Medieval Population

The anthropological type of Ukrainians of Cossack Era was formed on the Old Rus anthropological substrate. They were mostly descendants of the inhabitants of former lands of Drevlyani, Volynyani, Tivertsy and partly Galichani. They were characterized by a combination of a broad face with a dolichocranial or mesocranial skull. People from non-Slavic groups, including ones from the steppe zone, also took part in the formation of the anthropological composition of the late medieval population of Ukraine. Mostly it was a population that was genetically related to the groups that had ancient roots in the Turkic-speaking world. It was characterized by a Zlivkin morphological complex (brachycranium, a relatively broad face that had a weakened horizontal profile at the top). The type is Caucasian, it was widespread in large areas occupied by the Saltovo-Mayatska culture. It was characteristic for the population of Khazaria, the medieval cities of Crimea, the plains of the North Caucasus, the southern Bulgarians. For the population of Volga Bulgaria, the appearance of this morphological complex is associated with the movement of the early Bulgarians genetically related to the Sarmatians. The type continued to dominate in some areas during the Golden Horde and after the Golden Horde Age. Its presence is recorded in the south of Ukraine and in Moldova. The infiltration of the descendants of this population into the Slavic environment of Ukraine took place in different ways. The source territories for it could be the Lower Dnieper and the Prut-Dniester interfluve. The time of infiltration is most likely the second half of the 13th—15th centuries. Single skulls which are characterized by a tall face with a sharp horizontal profile and can be associated with people from the North Caucasus are recorded in the late medieval cemeteries of Ukraine. Skulls with clearly defined Mongoloid features practically are not found in the late medieval Christian cemeteries of Ukraine. Groups of nomads with these features (from Cumans to Nogai Tartars) are anthropologically differ as far as possible from the population of Cossack Era Ukraine, which was buried in Christian cemeteries.

The situation on piroplasmidoses of cattle on the south-east of the North Caucasus

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
A.M. Ataev ◽  
◽  
M.M. Zubairova ◽  
Z.M. Dzhambulatov ◽  
N.T. Karsakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
The North

BIODIVERSITY OF WILD RUMINANTS HELMINTHS IN ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (41) ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
A.M. ATAEV ◽  
◽  
M.M. ZUBAIROVA ◽  
N.T. KARSAKOV ◽  
Z.M. DZHAMBULATOV ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Caucasus ◽  
The South ◽  
Wild Ruminants ◽  
The North

scholarly journals Methodology of geoinformation mapping of natural recreational resources of the North Caucasus for tourism development

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-415
Author(s):  
Rakim Mahmudov ◽  
Natalia Verozub ◽  
Vitaly Proskurin
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Mineral Waters ◽  
The Black Sea ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
Mountain Areas ◽  
The North ◽  
Natural Components ◽  
Recreational Resources

The relationship of natural components with the organization of tourism as a type of economic activity is shown. Recommendations are formulated on the selection of indicators of natural components to be assessed when planning the organization of recreational activities. The assessment of natural resources by the methods of constructing mathematical-cartographic models. Evaluation of each parameter was both functional and aesthetic parameters. The biological diversity of vegetation was calculated by identifying polygon heights and slope exposures according to SRTM data. The relief analysis was carried out according to two parameters: absolute altitudes above sea level and the nature of dissection. The calculation of the absolute heights is prepared by the method of constructing a cartogram by analyzing the quantitative value of points. The calculation of the terrain relief is prepared by the method of constructing a cartogram by calculating the sum of the distances of isolines in the polygon. Cartograms of the density of the river network, the area and the number of water bodies were constructed. The numerical data of the natural components forming the recreational potential of the territory are obtained. An integral assessment of the North Caucasus on the availability and use of natural and recreational resources by adding the numerical values of the individual components in the aisles of the minimum territorial unit is carried out. As a result of the work by geoinformation methods, the zones of the greatest and smallest concentration of natural resources for the organization of tourist activity were determined. In the Western Caucasus, the zones of the highest concentration of natural resources (4, 5 points) for the organization of tourism are located within the Black Sea and Azov coasts in the Greater Sochi region, as well as the southern tip of the Republic of Adygea located on the spurs of a rocky ridge. The lowest mark (1, 2 points) was received by the northern regions of the Krasnodar Territory, located in the steppe, forest-steppe zones, subject to agricultural development and extensive land cultivation. Within the Central Caucasus, the zones with the highest rating are located in the foothills of the Caucasian Mineral Waters, in the mid-mountain areas within the Lateral and Rocky Ranges. On the territory of the Eastern Caucasus, zones with a rating of 4, 5 points are located within the Bogos and Samur ranges. Broad-leaved forests prevail on this territory, turning into subalpine meadows with rich species diversity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document