scholarly journals Ultrastable stimulus-response latencies: Acquisition and stimulus control

1980 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon W. Hopkins ◽  
Alfred B. Kristofferson
1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 835-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Moskowitz ◽  
Marcelline Burns

Response latencies in naming visually displayed numbers were measured for 20 Ss under control and alcohol treatments. The size of the stimulus pool was varied by sets of trials to produce stimulus-response uncertainty in the range 0 to 5 bits. Response latencies were a function of the amount of uncertainty, but alcohol impairment was not.


1991 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos J. Adam ◽  
Loe M. A. Van Veggel

The present study evaluated the potential for neuroanatomical factors to operate in a simple reaction time task. That is, response latencies were recorded for all ten fingers on a Donders' A reaction time task. Two finger-placement conditions were used, a single response key condition and a multiple response key condition. This latter condition required subjects to place all ten fingers on response keys. 30 male, right-handed subjects participated. No significant effects were found, indicating that there are no intrinsically slow or fast fingers. This finding is discussed in the context of reaction time differences between individual stimulus-response (finger) pairs in choice-reaction time tasks.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. e9
Author(s):  
S. Varechova ◽  
M. Poussel ◽  
C. Schweitzer ◽  
B. Demoulin ◽  
B. Chenuel ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. T. Stoddard ◽  
Murray Sidman

4 rhesus monkeys received intradimensional discrimination training initially at distant and then at near points on a circle-ellipse continuum. The training did not necessarily produce good stimulus control by test-stimulus differences smaller than the original training values. It was concluded that the original controlling stimulus-response relation did not correspond with the relations being evaluated by the generalization test.


2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared B. Smith ◽  
Todd M. Mowery ◽  
Kevin D. Alloway

The dorsolateral part of the striatum (DLS) represents the initial stage for processing sensorimotor information in the basal ganglia. Although the DLS receives much of its input from the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, peripheral somesthetic stimulation activates the DLS at latencies that are shorter than the response latencies recorded in the SI cortex. To identify the subcortical regions that transmit somesthetic information directly to the DLS, we deposited small quantities of retrograde tracers at DLS sites that displayed consistent time-locked responses to controlled whisker stimulation. The neurons that were retrogradely labeled by these injections were located mainly in the sensorimotor cortex and, to a lesser degree, in the amygdala and thalamus. Quantitative analysis of neuronal labeling in the thalamus indicated that the strongest thalamic input to the whisker-sensitive part of the DLS originates from the medial posterior nucleus (POm), a somesthetic-related region that receives inputs from the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Anterograde tracer injections in POm confirmed that this thalamic region projects to the DLS neuropil. In subsequent experiments, simultaneous recordings from POm and the DLS during whisker stimulation showed that POm consistently responds before the DLS. These results suggest that POm could transmit somesthetic information to the DLS, and this modality-specific thalamostriatal pathway may cooperate with the thalamostriatal projections that originate from the intralaminar nuclei.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document