scholarly journals Amount of practice and degree of attentional control have no influence on the adverse effect of alcohol in word categorization and visual search tasks

1988 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Maylor ◽  
P. M. A. Rabbitt

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Einat Rashal ◽  
Mehdi Senoussi ◽  
Elisa Santandrea ◽  
Suliann Ben Hamed ◽  
Emiliano Macaluso ◽  
...  

This work reports an investigation of the effect of combined top-down and bottom-up attentional control sources, using known attention-related EEG components that are thought to reflect target selection (N2pc) and distractor suppression (PD), in easy and difficult visual search tasks.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walden Y. Li ◽  
Molly R McKinney ◽  
Jessica Irons ◽  
Andrew B. Leber

Does attentional control strategy generalize across different visual search tasks? Previous research has failed to observe significant correlations in strategy metrics between different visual search tasks (Clarke et al., 2020), suggesting that strategy is not unitary, or determined by a single trait variable. Here we question just how heterogeneous (non-unitary) strategies are, hypothesizing a similarity gradient account, which holds that strategy does generalize to some degree, specifically across tasks with similar attentional components. To test this account, we employed the Adaptive Choice Visual Search (ACVS; Irons & Leber, 2018a), a visual search paradigm designed to directly measure attentional control strategy. In two studies, we had participants complete the ACVS and a modified, but similar, task with one altered attentional component (specifically, the requirement to use feature-based attention and enumeration, respectively). We found positive correlations in strategy optimality between tasks that do vs. do not involve feature-based attention (r = .38, p = .0068) and across tasks that do vs. do not require enumeration (r = .33, p = .018). Thus, attentional control strategies did generalize across sufficiently similar tasks, although the strength of the correlations was weaker than the within-task test-retest reliability of strategy measure. These results support the similarity gradient account.



2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Mitroff ◽  
Adam T. Biggs ◽  
Matthew S. Cain ◽  
Elise F. Darling ◽  
Kait Clark ◽  
...  


1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Stivalet ◽  
Yvan Moreno ◽  
Joëlle Richard ◽  
Pierre-Alain Barraud ◽  
Christian Raphel
Keyword(s):  


Perception ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M Wolfe ◽  
Alice Yee ◽  
Stacia R Friedman-Hill


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heida Maria Sigurdardottir ◽  
Hilma Ros Omarsdóttir ◽  
Anna Sigridur Valgeirsdottir

Attention has been hypothesized to act as a sequential gating mechanism for the orderly processing of letters in words. These same visuo-attentional processes are assumed to partake in some but not all visual search tasks. In the current study, 60 adults with varying degrees of reading abilities, ranging from expert readers to severely impaired dyslexic readers, completed an attentionally demanding visual conjunction search task thought to heavily rely on the dorsal visual stream. A visual feature search task served as an internal control. According to the dorsal view of dyslexia, reading problems should go hand in hand with specific problems in visual conjunction search – particularly elevated conjunction search slopes (time per search item) – which would be interpreted as a problem with visual attention. Results showed that reading problems were associated with slower visual search, especially conjunction search. However, problems with reading were not associated with increased conjunction search slopes but instead with increased conjunction search intercepts, traditionally not interpreted as reflecting attentional processes. Our data are hard to reconcile with hypothesized problems in dyslexia with the serial moving of an attentional spotlight across a visual scene or a page of text.



2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alasdair D F Clarke ◽  
Jessica Irons ◽  
Warren James ◽  
Andrew B. Leber ◽  
Amelia R. Hunt

A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here we ask if an individual's strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers in the three tasks mentioned above over two sessions. Even though the test-retest reliability of the tasks is high, an observer's performance and strategy in one task did not reliably predict their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals, but also how individuals interact with the search task and context. These context-specific but stable individual differences in strategy can account for a substantial proportion of variability in search performance.



2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 311b
Author(s):  
Zachary A Lively ◽  
Gavin JP Ng ◽  
Simona Buetti ◽  
Alejandro Lleras


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document