scholarly journals Operational Readiness of a P.S. Redundant System with Three Types of Failure and Waiting Concept

Author(s):  
Sanjay Goel ◽  
Anand Tyagi ◽  
Sachin Kumar
Optimization ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-462
Author(s):  
L. Cunningham ◽  
N. Singh

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 2143-2145
Author(s):  
Meng-hua MAN ◽  
Liang YUAN ◽  
Guo-liang DING ◽  
Zheng-quan JU ◽  
Liang SONG

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Kukjoo Kim ◽  
Kyung-Ryeung Min ◽  
Young-Jun Park

The Korean peninsula is under increasing threat of electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) from neighboring countries; EMP protection facilities are an essential means of ensuring the operational readiness of the military. However, existing EMP protection facilities are manufactured as fixed-weight structures, which limit the mobility of military operations and lead to the misconception of EMP protection as something only required for higher command. The current military and official EMP protection standards require only a uniform shielding effectiveness of 80 dB. Therefore, this study aims to differentiate the existing uniform level of shielding effectiveness of 80 dB into 80 dB, 60 dB, 40 dB, etc. Further, it seeks to derive the factors to be considered when applying various methods, such as shielding rooms, shielding racks, site redundancy, spare equipment, and portable lightweight protective tents, for recovery of failure, instead of the existing protection facilities that rely on shielded rooms by the Delphi analysis. Then, the applicability of lightweight EMP protection is determined after selecting lightweight materials to build a facility. The electromagnetic shielding performance of 21 types of materials was measured in the 30 MHz–1.5 GHz frequency band using ASTM-D-4935-10. The results showed the possibility of developing a lightweight EMP shielding facility, which would save approximately 316,386 tons of concrete, reducing the CO2 emissions by approximately 9,972,489 tons. Assuming that the Korean carbon transaction price is USD 50/ton CO2, the savings are equivalent to USD 49,862,435.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document