Efficacy of Carnitine in Treatment of Tinnitus: Evidence from Audiological and MRI Measures—A Case Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 311-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamakshi V. Gopal ◽  
Binu P. Thomas ◽  
Deng Mao ◽  
Hanzhang Lu

Background: Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is an extremely common ear disorder. However, it is a phenomenon that is very poorly understood and has limited treatment options. Purpose: The goals of this case study were to identify if the antioxidant acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) provides relief from tinnitus, and to identify if subjective satisfaction after carnitine treatment is accompanied by changes in audiological and imaging measures. Research Design: Case Study. Patient Case: A 41-yr-old female with a history of hearing loss and tinnitus was interested in exploring the benefits of antioxidant therapy in reducing her tinnitus. The patient was evaluated using a standard audiological/tinnitus test battery and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) recordings before carnitine treatment. After her physician's approval, the patient took 500 mg of ALCAR twice a day for 30 consecutive days. The audiological and MRI measures were repeated after ALCAR treatment. Data Collection and Analysis: Pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, tinnitus questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire), auditory brainstem response, functional MRI (fMRI), functional connectivity MRI, and cerebral blood flow evaluations were conducted before intake of ALCAR and were repeated 30 days after ALCAR treatment. Results: The patient’s pretreatment pure-tone audiogram indicated a mild sensorineural hearing loss at 6 kHz in the right ear and 4 kHz in the left ear. Posttreatment evaluation indicated marginal improvement in the patient’s pure-tone thresholds, but was sufficient to be classified as being clinically normal in both ears. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions results showed increased overall emissions after ALCAR treatment. Subjective report from the patient indicated that her tinnitus was less annoying and barely noticeable during the day after treatment, and the posttreatment tinnitus questionnaire scores supported her statement. Auditory brainstem response peak V amplitude growth between stimulus intensity levels of 40–80 dB nHL indicated a reduction in growth for the posttreatment condition compared with the pretreatment condition. This was attributed to a possible active gating mechanism involving the auditory brainstem after ALCAR treatment. Posttreatment fMRI recordings in response to acoustic stimuli indicated a statistically significant reduction in brain activity in several regions of the brain, including the auditory cortex. Cerebral blood flow showed increased flow in the auditory cortex after treatment. The functional connectivity MRI indicated increased connectivity between the right and left auditory cortex, but a decrease in connectivity between the auditory cortex and some regions of the “default mode network,” namely the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex. Conclusions: The changes observed in the objective and subjective test measures after ALCAR treatment, along with the patient’s personal observations, indicate that carnitine intake may be a valuable pharmacological option in the treatment of tinnitus.

Author(s):  
Ö Gedik ◽  
H Hüsam ◽  
M Başöz ◽  
N Tas ◽  
F Aksoy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate different auditory regions with audiological tests, based on the presumption that there may be damage to the structures in the hearing system after coronavirus disease 2019. Methods Twenty individuals with no history of coronavirus disease 2019 and 27 individuals diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 were compared. Pure tone, speech and extended high-frequency audiometry, acoustic immitansmetry, transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing, and auditory brainstem response testing were conducted. Results The pure tone audiometry and extended high-frequency mean threshold values were higher in the coronavirus disease 2019 group. The transient evoked otoacoustic emissions signal-to-noise ratios were bilaterally lower at 4 kHz in individuals with a coronavirus disease 2019 history. In the auditory brainstem response test, only the interpeak latencies of waves III–V were significantly different between groups. Conclusion Coronavirus disease 2019 may cause damage to the hearing system. Patients should be followed up in the long term with advanced audiological evaluation methods in order to determine the extent and level of damage.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Meyrna Heryaning Putri ◽  
Pudji Rahaju ◽  
Dyah Indrasworo

Latar belakang: Kemoterapi neoadjuvan adalah induksi kemoterapi sebelum radioterapi dengan regimen cisplatin dan 5-Fluorouracil. Kemoterapi cisplatin bersifat ototoksik pada pendengaran sensorineural bilateral progresif dan bersifat irreversible. Kriteria dari American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) dan Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) merupakan kriteria untuk mengidentifikasi ototoksisitas dengan menggunakan audiometri, selain pemeriksaan Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE). Tujuan: Mengidentifikasi hubungan ototoksisitas dengan kemoterapi neoadjuvan pada penderita karsinoma nasofaring (KNF) WHO tipe III menggunakan ASHA, CTCAE, serta DPOAE. Metode: Studi ini adalah penelitian observasional dengan desain cohort. Kriteria inklusi penelitian yaitu penderita baru KNF WHO tipe III, yang mendapatkan kemoterapi regimen standar dan berusia <60 tahun. Kriteria pemeriksaan DPOAE adalah penderita dengan ambang dengar ≤40 dB. Percontoh dilakukan pemeriksaan timpanometri, audiometri, dan DPOAE. Hasil: Terdapat 9 sampel percontoh penelitian. Uji repeated-ANOVA menunjukkan tidak ditemukan perbedaan bermakna pada tiga hasil pengukuran audiometri antara pascakemoterapi pertama, kedua, dan ketiga (p>0,05). Deteksi awal ototoksisitas menggunakan kriteria ASHA menunjukkan sensitivitas sebesar 67% dan dan CTCAE 44%, dibandingkan baku emas menggunakan DPOAE. Kesimpulan: Ototoksisitas cisplatin ditemukan sejak kemoterapi pertama dengan menggunakan pemeriksaan DPOAE walaupun tidak bermakna secara statistik. Kemampuan DPOAE untuk mendeteksi awal ototoksisitas lebih baik dibandingkan kriteria ASHA dan CTCAE yang menggunakan audiometri nada murni.Kata kunci: Karsinoma nasofaring, ototoksisitas sisplatin, DPOAE, CTCAE, ASHA ABSTRACT Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracyl regiment. Chemotherapy cisplatin is ototoxic, leads to frequently progresive and irreversible bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are the criteria to determine ototoxicity with audiometry, beside Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE). Purpose: To identify the relationship between ototoxicity with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients NPC WHO type III using ASHA, CTCAE, and DPOAE. Method: This observational study approach with cohort design. Inclusion criteria: new patients NPC WHO type III who consented to undergo standard regiment chemotherapy, and age <60 year-old. For DPOAE examination: hearing level ≤40 dB. Exclucion criteria: NPC WHO type III patients who underwent chemotherapy with unconventional standard regiment. Examinations for hearing function conducted with tympanometry, pure tone audiometry, and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE). Result: There were 9 sample in this study. The result of Repeated-ANOVA test showed no significant difference in three audiometry measurements among three series of chemotherapies. Early detection of ototoxicity using ASHA and CTCAE criterias showed sensitivity of 67% and 44% (compared with DPOAE as a gold standard). Conclusion: Cisplatin ototoxicity had occured since the first chemotherapy and detected with DPOAE, but statistically was not significantly related. Early detection of cisplatin ototoxicity with DPOAE was much better than with criteria American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), which used pure tone audiometry.Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cisplatin ototoxicity, DPOAE, CTCAE, ASHA


1994 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Hall ◽  
Jane E. Baer ◽  
Patricia A. Chase ◽  
Mitchell K. Schwaber

Three electrophysiologic audiologic procedures-aural immittance measurement, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and otoacoustic emissions (OAE) — were first described in the 1970's. Immittance measurement and ABR have contributed importantly for years to the assessment of auditory function in children and adults, whereas OAEs have not yet been incorporated into the everyday audiology test battery. In this article, we argue that the transition from OAE measurement by hearing scientists in laboratory settings to routine application by audiologists in the clinic will be greatly facilitated by (1) comprehensive, large-scale studies of the effects of subject characteristics, such as gender and age (from infancy to advancing adulthood), on both transient evoked (TEOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE) otoacoustic emissions; (2) clinical investigations of TEOAE and DPOAE in sizeable patient populations with specific neurotologic diagnoses; (3) guidelines for OAE test protocols in clinical environments; and (4) clear criteria for OAE analysis in clinical populations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 271 (10) ◽  
pp. 2649-2660
Author(s):  
Antonis Moukos ◽  
Dimitrios G. Balatsouras ◽  
Thomas Nikolopoulos ◽  
Pavlos Maragoudakis ◽  
Evangelos I. Yiotakis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document