scholarly journals Effects of isokinetic strength training for lower extremity motor function in stroke patients with hemiplegia: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linhong Jiang ◽  
Rui Qi ◽  
Guangyuan Zhang ◽  
Lijuan Zhao ◽  
Weiqin Cong
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Strength Training ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Stroke Patients

Use of Kinesio taping in lower-extremity rehabilitation of post-stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Wang ◽  
Zi-wen Pei ◽  
Bei-dou Xiong ◽  
Xian-mei Meng ◽  
Xiao-li Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Kinesio Taping

scholarly journals Is Dry Needling Effective for the Management of Spasticity, Pain, and Motor Function in Post-Stroke Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas ◽  
Albert Pérez-Bellmunt ◽  
Luis Llurda-Almuzara ◽  
Gustavo Plaza-Manzano ◽  
Ana I De-la-Llave-Rincón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Muscle Tone ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effects of muscle dry needling alone or combined with other interventions on post-stroke spasticity (muscle tone), related pain, motor function, and pressure sensitivity. Databases and Data Treatment Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials including post-stroke patients where at least one group received dry needling and outcomes were collected on spasticity and related pain. Secondary outcomes included motor function and pressure pain sensitivity. Data were extracted by two reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, methodological quality was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database score, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Between-groups mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated. Results Seven studies (three within the lower extremity, four in the upper extremity) were included. The meta-analysis found significantly large effect sizes of dry needling for reducing spasticity (SMD: -1.01, 95%confidence interval [CI] -1.68 to -0.34), post-stroke pain (SMD -1.01, 95%CI -1.73 to -0.30), and pressure pain sensitivity (SMD 1.21, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.80) as compared with a comparative group at short-term follow-up. The effect on spasticity was found mainly in the lower extremity (MD -1.05, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.78) at short-term follow-up. No effect on spasticity was seen at 4 weeks. No significant effect on motor function (SMD 0.16, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.44) was observed. The risk of bias was generally low, but the imprecision of the results downgraded the level of evidence. Conclusion Moderate evidence suggests a positive effect of dry needling on spasticity (muscle tone) in the lower extremity in post-stroke patients. The effects on related pain and motor function are inconclusive.

scholarly journals Leap Motion Controller Video Game-Based Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Patients with Central Nervous System Diseases. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2065
Author(s):  
Irene Cortés-Pérez ◽  
Noelia Zagalaz-Anula ◽  
Desirée Montoro-Cárdenas ◽  
Rafael Lomas-Vega ◽  
Esteban Obrero-Gaitán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Video Game ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Leap Motion ◽  
Motion Controller ◽  
Motor Dexterity ◽  
Quality Evidence

Leap Motion Controller (LMC) is a virtual reality device that can be used in the rehabilitation of central nervous system disease (CNSD) motor impairments. This review aimed to evaluate the effect of video game-based therapy with LMC on the recovery of upper extremity (UE) motor function in patients with CNSD. A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in PubMed Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PEDro. We included five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with CNSD in which LMC was used as experimental therapy compared to conventional therapy (CT) to restore UE motor function. Pooled effects were estimated with Cohen’s standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). At first, in patients with stroke, LMC showed low-quality evidence of a large effect on UE mobility (SMD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.47, 1.45). In combination with CT, LMC showed very low-quality evidence of a large effect on UE mobility (SMD = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.49, 2.19) and the UE mobility-oriented task (SMD = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.42, 2.10). Second, in patients with non-acute CNSD (cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease), LMC showed low-quality evidence of a medium effect on grip strength (GS) (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.90) and on gross motor dexterity (GMD) (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.28, 1.17) in the most affected UE. In combination with CT, LMC showed very low-quality evidence of a high effect in the most affected UE on GMD (SMD = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.06, 1.15) and fine motor dexterity (FMD) (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.07, 1.57). In stroke, LMC improved UE mobility and UE mobility-oriented tasks, and in non-acute CNSD, LMC improved the GS and GMD of the most affected UE and FMD when it was used with CT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document