User-friendly, High-throughput, and Fully Automated Data Acquisition Software for Single-particle Cryo-electron Microscopy

Author(s):  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Surekha P. ◽  
Sahil Gulati ◽  
Somnath Dutta
2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (S2) ◽  
pp. 124-125
Author(s):  
S Nickell ◽  
F Beck ◽  
E Sakata ◽  
A Korinek ◽  
W Baumeister ◽  
...  

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2011 in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, August 7–August 11, 2011.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Rheinberger ◽  
Gert Oostergetel ◽  
Guenter P Resch ◽  
Cristina Paulino

AbstractSample thickness is a known key parameter in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and can affect the amount of high-resolution information retained in the image. Yet, common data acquisition approaches in single particle cryo-EM do not take it into account. Here, we demonstrate how the sample thickness can be determined before data acquisition, allowing to identify optimal regions and restrict data collection to images with preserved high-resolution details. This quality over quantity approach, almost entirely eliminates the time- and storage-consuming collection of suboptimal images, which are discarded after a recorded session or during early image processing due to lack of high-resolution information. It maximizes data collection efficiency and lowers the electron microscopy time required per dataset. This strategy is especially useful, if the speed of data collection is restricted by the microscope hardware and software, or if data transfer, data storage and computational power are a bottleneck.SynopsisDetermining sample thickness, a key parameter in single particle cryo-electron microscopy, before data acquisition, and targeting only optimal areas, maximizes the data output from a single particle cryo-electron microscopy session. Scripts and optimized workflows for EPU and SerialEM are presented utilizing this concept.


2008 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 022008 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Bainbridge ◽  
G Baulieu ◽  
S Bel ◽  
J Cole ◽  
N Cripps ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 346-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Neto ◽  
J. Sousa ◽  
B. Carvalho ◽  
H. Fernandes ◽  
R.C. Pereira ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 361 (6405) ◽  
pp. 876-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifan Cheng

Cryo–electron microscopy, or simply cryo-EM, refers mainly to three very different yet closely related techniques: electron crystallography, single-particle cryo-EM, and electron cryotomography. In the past few years, single-particle cryo-EM in particular has triggered a revolution in structural biology and has become a newly dominant discipline. This Review examines the fascinating story of its start and evolution over the past 40-plus years, delves into how and why the recent technological advances have been so groundbreaking, and briefly considers where the technique may be headed in the future.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Cheng ◽  
Bufan Li ◽  
Long Si ◽  
Xinzheng Zhang

AbstractCryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) tomography is a powerful tool for in situ structure determination. However, this method requires the acquisition of tilt series, and its time consuming throughput of acquiring tilt series severely slows determination of in situ structures. By treating the electron densities of non-target protein as non-Gaussian distributed noise, we developed a new target function that greatly improves the efficiency of the recognition of the target protein in a single cryo-EM image without acquiring tilt series. Moreover, we developed a sorting function that effectively eliminates the false positive detection, which not only improves the resolution during the subsequent structure refinement procedure but also allows using homolog proteins as models to recognize the target protein. Together, we developed an in situ single particle analysis (isSPA) method. Our isSPA method was successfully applied to solve structures of glycoproteins on the surface of a non-icosahedral virus and Rubisco inside the carboxysome. The cryo-EM data from both samples were collected within 24 hours, thus allowing fast and simple structural determination in situ.


2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-211
Author(s):  
Manuel Eleazar Martínez-Gutiérrez ◽  
José Rafael Rojano-Cáceres ◽  
Edgard Benítez-Guerrero ◽  
Héctor Eduardo Sánchez-Barrera

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document