Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Poor-Risk and Relapsed Intermediate- and High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Auayporn Nademanee ◽  
Arturo Molina ◽  
Andrew Dagis ◽  
David S. Snyder ◽  
Margaret R. O'Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Effect Of Plerixafor Mobilization On Immune Reconstitution Post High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2031-2031
Author(s):  
Melhem M. Solh ◽  
Tori Smith ◽  
Yasser Khaled ◽  
Alicja Copik
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Immune Reconstitution ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction Plerixafor is a reversible CXCR4 antagonist that has been approved by the food and drug administration for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients mobilized with Plerixafor were shown to have a higher proportion of primitive stem cells (CD34+/CD133+/CD38-), CD4+ T cells and Natural killer cells (CD3-/CD16+/CD56+) in the graft composition when compared to patients mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF alone .We investigated the effect of Plerixafor on immune reconstitution at thirty and sixty days post autologous stem cell transplantation. Methods Patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were enrolled on a single arm prospective immune reconstitution trial. A complete blood count, differential and lymphocyte flow cytometry panel (T cell, NK cell and B cell markers) was checked on Days 30 and 60 post autologous transplantation. Stem cell mobilization was carried per our institutional standards. All patients received subcutaneous G-CSF at a dose of 10 µg per kilogram body weight for four consecutive days. On Day4, patient with a peripheral CD34 count of ≤20/µl received plerixafor 0.24mg/kg. Collection was started on day 5 and continued till collection goal was reached or patient failed to get the minimal cell dose after 4 consecutive days of aphaeresis. Results 49 patients were enrolled during the period from September 2010 till May 2012. Median age at time of transplantation was 54 years (range 21; 72 years). 35 patients had multiple myeloma and 14 had non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 16 patients received GCSF alone (group A) and 33 had plerixafor plus GCSF (group B) for mobilization. All patients achieved the minimum target of CD34 collection. The mean number of collection days was 1.9 and 1.4 days (p=0.05) with a total collection dose of 7.76 and 7.61 CD34 x106/Kg for groups A and B respectively. The percentage proportion of CD34 in the aphaeresis product was 0.73% and 0.75% (p=0.9) for group A and B. Total infused CD34 dose was similar in both groups (4.88 and 4.56 CD34x106/kg) with time to engraftment of 11.68 vs 11.69 days for neutrophils and 20.62 vs 21.39 for platelets in groups A and B respectively. There was no difference between day 30 absolute lymphocyte count (1.09 vs 1.44 x103/mm3 p=0.18); Absolute NK cell (0.31 vs 0.35 x103/µl; p=0.51); absolute T cell count (0.71 vs 0.96 x103/µl p=0.33) and absolute neutrophil count (2.98 vs 2.63 x103/mm3 p=0.37). The cell count recovery was also not significantly different when analyzed per disease (myeloma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and at day 60. Conclusion Our study shows that patient mobilized with plerixafor and G-CSF have similar immune reconstitution at 30 and 60 days post autologous transplantation compared to patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of netupitant/palonosetron combination (NEPA) in preventing nausea and vomiting in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients undergoing to chemomobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Di Renzo ◽  
Maurizio Musso ◽  
Rosanna Scimè ◽  
Alessandra Cupri ◽  
Tommasina Perrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract Purpose Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is particularly challenging for patients receiving highly emetogenic preparative regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to the daily and continuous emetogenic stimulus of the multiple day chemotherapy. While studies have shown effective prevention of CINV during the conditioning phase with NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA)-containing regimens, there have been no studies evaluating antiemetic use during chemomobilization prior to ASCT. Methods This multicenter, open-label, phase IIa study evaluated the efficacy of every-other-day dosing of NEPA administered during chemomobilization in patients with relapsed-refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eighty-one patients participated. Results Response rates were 77.8% for complete response (no emesis and no rescue use), 72.8% for complete control (complete response and no more than mild nausea), 86.4% for no emesis, and 82.7% for no rescue use during the overall phase (duration of chemomobilization through 48 h after). NEPA was well tolerated with no treatment-related adverse events reported. Conclusion NEPA, administered with a simplified every-other-day schedule, show to be very effective in preventing CINV in patients at high risk of CINV undergoing to chemomobilization of hematopoietic stem cells prior to ASCT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document