scholarly journals DYNAMICAL MASS MEASUREMENTS OF CONTAMINATED GALAXY CLUSTERS USING MACHINE LEARNING

2016 ◽  
Vol 831 (2) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ntampaka ◽  
H. Trac ◽  
D. J. Sutherland ◽  
S. Fromenteau ◽  
B. Póczos ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 803 (2) ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ntampaka ◽  
H. Trac ◽  
D. J. Sutherland ◽  
N. Battaglia ◽  
B. Póczos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 887 (1) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Ho ◽  
Markus Michael Rau ◽  
Michelle Ntampaka ◽  
Arya Farahi ◽  
Hy Trac ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 499 (2) ◽  
pp. 1985-1997
Author(s):  
Doogesh Kodi Ramanah ◽  
Radosław Wojtak ◽  
Zoe Ansari ◽  
Christa Gall ◽  
Jens Hjorth

ABSTRACT We present an algorithm for inferring the dynamical mass of galaxy clusters directly from their respective phase-space distributions, that is, the observed line-of-sight velocities and projected distances of galaxies from the cluster centre. Our method employs normalizing flows, a deep neural network capable of learning arbitrary high-dimensional probability distributions, and inherently accounts, to an adequate extent, for the presence of interloper galaxies which are not bounded to a given cluster, the primary contaminant of dynamical mass measurements. We validate and showcase the performance of our neural flow approach to robustly infer the dynamical mass of clusters from a realistic mock cluster catalogue. A key aspect of our novel algorithm is that it yields the probability density function of the mass of a particular cluster, thereby providing a principled way of quantifying uncertainties, in contrast to conventional machine learning (ML) approaches. The neural network mass predictions, when applied to a contaminated catalogue with interlopers, have a mean overall logarithmic residual scatter of 0.028 dex, with a lognormal scatter of 0.126 dex, which goes down to 0.089 dex for clusters in the intermediate- to high-mass range. This is an improvement by nearly a factor of 4 relative to the classical cluster mass scaling relation with the velocity dispersion, and outperforms recently proposed ML approaches. We also apply our neural flow mass estimator to a compilation of galaxy observations of some well-studied clusters with robust dynamical mass estimates, further substantiating the efficacy of our algorithm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 160 (5) ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
Carter Rhea ◽  
Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo ◽  
Laurence Perreault-Levasseur ◽  
Marie-Lou Gendron-Marsolais ◽  
Ralph Kraft

2006 ◽  
Vol 370 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Shapiro ◽  
M. Cappellari ◽  
T. De Zeeuw ◽  
R. M. McDermid ◽  
K. Gebhardt ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 383 ◽  
pp. 012011
Author(s):  
Iacopo Bartalucci ◽  
Ilaria Formicola ◽  
Rossella Martino

2020 ◽  
Vol 644 ◽  
pp. A126
Author(s):  
C. Tchernin ◽  
E. T. Lau ◽  
S. Stapelberg ◽  
D. Hug ◽  
M. Bartelmann

Context. Biases in mass measurements of galaxy clusters are one of the major limiting systematics in constraining cosmology with clusters. Aims. We aim to demonstrate that the systematics associated with cluster gravitational potentials are smaller than the hydrostatic mass bias and that cluster potentials could therefore be a good alternative to cluster masses in cosmological studies. Methods. Using cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters, we compute the biases in the hydrostatic mass (HE mass) and those in the gravitational potential, reconstructed from measurements at X-ray and millimeter wavelengths. In particular, we investigate the effects of the presence of substructures and of nonthermal pressure support on both the HE mass and the reconstructed potential. Results. We find that the bias in the reconstructed potential (6%) is less than that of the HE mass (13%) and that the scatter in the reconstructed potential decreases by ∼35% with respect to that in the HE mass. Conclusions. This study shows that characterizing galaxy clusters by their gravitational potential is a promising alternative to using cluster masses in cluster cosmology.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 04004 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J. Dupuy ◽  
M.C. Liu ◽  
M.J. Ireland

Author(s):  
A. Ferragamo ◽  
R. Barrena ◽  
J. A. Rubiño-Martín ◽  
A. Aguado-Barahona ◽  
A. Streblyanska ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document