On the Maranao Concept of Tindeg: An Anthropological Discourse

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagasura T Madale
Author(s):  
Izabela Funk

The object of the author’s reflection is the status of the empathy category as an interdisciplinary research category and its relation to the experience issue. It is the problem that is particularly emphasized in the literary discourse, for which an indispensable context is cultural and anthropological discourse, the synthesis of which determines the transdisciplinary nature of research in the category of experience and empathy. The sketch is a cross-section of the most important thoughts that shape the postmodern reflection on these areas. First of all, the ways of the assumption applying of research on empathy - based on the ethical return - in Polish language education- was subjected to the consideration. The last part of this paper was devoted to the presentation of possible activities related to the reading of The Witcher Andrzej Sapkowski at Polish language lessons, striving to problematize the problem of the experience of otherness, and therefore the mechanisms of expanding the receiving empathic sensitivity.


1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 213-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Young

Abstract Take as pivotal in anthropological discourse the invention of the category of the Other. Once invented, the category conjures up another realm, a realm inhabited by the Other and estranged from the realm of the self. Ethnographic writings are then constructed to get access to the Other. At issue, then, are how realms of experience are constellated with respect to each other, how they communicate, and how they coalesce. One name for these realm relations is dialogism. Under a dialogic description, the boundaries between self and Other become blurred, along with the boundaries between the universes of discourse they inhabit. Eth-nographic writings formulate relationships between realms in terms of conven-tions of perspective and voice. These conventions are anchored in the body. In particular, a hierarchy of modalities of perception informs a social scientific epistemology. In this article, the realm status of self and Other in anthropological discourse is investigated in three perspectives: the objective, the subjective, and what I call the intersubjective. Problems of access turn out to be artifacts of our invention of the category of the Other. (Ethnographic Writing)


2020 ◽  
pp. 167-186
Author(s):  
Karin Harrasser ◽  
Pantelis Michelakis

This chapter explores the experimental and precarious character of the sense of touch in philosophy (Aristotle, the mystics, enlightenment philosophers), in artistic practice (Diego Velázquez) and in the physiological–anthropological discourse of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Lotze, Katz). It argues for a praxeological and media–ecological re-evaluation of the European philosophical discourse on tactility and against essentializing understandings of the sense of touch in order to rediscover one of its classic roots: the sense of touch as a medium of subtlety, as the basis of the capacity for aesthetic differentiation that bridges cognition and sensuousness and opens the psyche for new experiences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document