scholarly journals Comparison of pressure‑regulated volume control ventilation and pressure control ventilation in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome

Author(s):  
Jiangtao Yin ◽  
Xin Pan ◽  
Jue Jia ◽  
Shuangshuang Sun ◽  
Bing Wan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Badur ◽  
Mustafa Altınay ◽  
Pınar Sayın ◽  
Ayşe Surhan Çınar ◽  
leyla türkoğlu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare the volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) cerebral oximetry and blood gas status in laparoscopic cholecystectomyMethods: Seventy patients (n=70), who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation were randomized into two groups (volume control ventilation - group V, pressure control ventilation - group P). Demographic data (age, gender, body mass index) and operative data (anesthesia, surgery, and insufflation durations) were recorded. Patients’ single derivation electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, non-invasive arterial pressure, NIRS cerebral oximetry and end-tidal CO2 parameters were recorded. Measurements were done at the start of anesthesia (T0), at the end of intubation (T1), 5 minutes after the insufflation (T2), at the time just before desufflation (T3) and 5 minutes after desufflation (T4).The patients’ heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, saturation of pulse oximetry, and NIRS values were recorded for time points. Additionally, arterial gas results and mechanical ventilation parameters were recorded as well. Results: No significant difference was found in age, sex, body mass index. Operation, anesthesia and insufflation durations were similar for the groups. In Group P, NIRS right T1-2-3 averages and NIRS left T2-3 averages were significantly higher than Group V (p=0.030, p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.006, p=0.002 respectively). In Group P T1-T2-T4, mean peak pressures and mean plateau pressures were significantly lower than Group V (p=0.003, p=0.001, p<0.001, p=0.011, p=0.001, p<0.001 respectively).Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation that performed in pressure-control ventilation mode is resulted with better tissue oxygenation than volume-control ventilation mode. In pressure-control ventilation mode, peak pressure and plateau pressure were lower.Registration of study at ClinicalTrials.gov was made at 25/01/2021 with the NCT04723043 number.


2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 982-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Britt ◽  
T. Gannon ◽  
J.N. Collins ◽  
F.J. Cole ◽  
L.J. Weireter ◽  
...  

Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), defined as intra-abdominal hypertension with associated pulmonary, renal, or hemodynamic compromise in the absence of preceding abdominal operation or injury, can markedly increase surgical morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective chart review of the physiologic parameters and outcomes of 10 patients with secondary ACS. Ten patients developed secondary ACS after aggressive resuscitation, at an average of 20.2 hours. Four of the patients sustained burns greater than 40 per cent, three of the patients had penetrating extremity trauma, one patient had blunt abdominal trauma, one patient was struck by lightning, and one patient developed a retroperitoneal bleed while on heparin. The average bladder pressure was 40.6. The average volume given in the first 24 hours was 33,001 cc (range, 12,400 to 69,000). The average base deficit at admission was -12 (range, +1 to -25). Seven of the 10 patients had decreased urine output. Nine of the 10 patients had decreased tidal volumes on pressure control ventilation. All 10 patients were hypotensive, with 7 of the 10 requiring vasopressors. Overall mortality was 60 per cent, with 43 per cent mortality for those decompressed. Prompt recognition and treatment are mandatory for survival of ACS. We recommend routine bladder pressure monitoring for patients with ongoing resuscitation greater than 500 cc/hr.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document