Delayed Tarsometatarsal Joint Dislocation Following Forefoot Injury

Orthopedics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-54
Author(s):  
Austen T Wynne ◽  
George W Southgate
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0007
Author(s):  
Mingzhu Zhang ◽  
Guangrong Yu

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Prospective analyses of treatment for the first tarsometatarsal joint dislocation with Lisfranc injury. Comparison of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis was conducted for the injury. Methods: 78 Lisfranc injuries with first tarsometatarsal joint dislocation underwent surgical intervention. They were 46 males and 32 females with mean age of 41.2 years. Two groups were randomized by ORIF group and primary arthrodesis group. 43 patients were performed by ORIF, while primary arthrodesis group including 35 cases. Outcome measures included radiographs, AOFAS scores, VAS and SF-36 scores. Complications and revision rate were analyzed also. Results: 73 patients were followed up for 21 months. At 1.5 years postoperatively, the AOFAS score was 75 and 83 in ORIF group and arthrodesis group. The VAS score was 3.0 and 2.1 separately in two groups. The mean Physical Functioning sores of SF- 36 was 81.2 points and 84.1 points. The Bodily Pain score of SF-36 was 79.3 points and 85.2 points. Redislocation of first tarsometarsal joint were observed in 11 cases among ORIF group.31 patients in ORIF group had pain in midfoot, six of them had persistent pain with the development of deformity or osteoarthrosis. No redislocation and no hardware failure was identified in arthrodesis group. Conclusion: Primary stable arthrodesis of the first ray gives a better short and medium term outcome than open reduction and internal fixation for Lisfranc injury with the first ray dislocation. Possible complication and revision could be avoided by primary arthrodesis for dislocated first ray injuries.


1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 685-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Hua Yang ◽  
Jike Lu ◽  
Ashok Biyani

Using computer-assisted techniques, this study analyzes the mean contact area of the articular surface of the second tarsometatarsal joint. The articular contact area decreased proportionate to the displacement in both males and females, but it was consistently greater in males than in females for all simulated displacements. The reduction in the contact area was the highest with dorsolateral displacement compared with the lateral and dorsal displacements. Dorsolateral displacement of the second metatarsal of 3 mm led to 38.6% reduction in the contact area, compared with 33.1% and 20.2% reduction with lateral and dorsal displacements, respectively. This study shows that even minor degrees of displacement not apparent on plain radiographs lead to significant decrease in the contact area of the second tarsometatarsal joint. Careful evaluation of second tarsometatarsal injuries with computed tomography is recommended to detect minor degrees of displacement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0004
Author(s):  
Mingzhu Zhang ◽  
Guang-Rong Yu

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Retrospective analyses of treatment for the first tarsometatarsal joint dislocation with Lisfranc injury. Comparison of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis was conducted for the injury. Methods: This was a multi-center study, involving nine clinical institutions in different area of China. .From January 2003 to June 2015, 126 Lisfranc injuries with first tarsometatarsal joint dislocation underwent surgical intervention. Of this group, 41 (32.5%) feet were first tarsometarsal joint dislocation only. 85 feet were first tarsometarsal joint dislocation and fractures. They were 76 males (60.3%) and 50 females (39.7%) with a mean age of 45.5 (range, 20-87) years. The duration from injury to surgery is 11.7 (range, 4-26) days. Two groups were divided by surgery methods as open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) group and primary arthrodesis group. Ninety two patients were performed by ORIF, while primary arthrodesis group including 34 cases. Outcome measures included clinical examination, radiographs, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) and SF-36 scores. Complications and revision rate were analyzed as well. Results: 126 patients were followed up for average of 29.5 months.At 1.5 years, the mean AOFAS Midfoot score at latest follow-up was 79 points and 85 points separately in ORIF and arthrodesis group(P<0.05). The VAS score was 3.1and 2.2 separately(P<0.05).The BP score of SF-36 was 76.1 points and 84.6 points(P<0.05). Five patients in the open-reduction group had loosen or broken hardware. Redislocation of first tarsometarsal joint were observed in 16 cases among ORIF group. 36patients in ORIF group had pain in midfoot, eight of them had persistent pain, and they were eventually revised with arthrodesis. Two patients had painful hardware and the symptom disappeared after removal of the hardware. No redislocation and no hardware failure was identified in arthrodesis group. Conclusion: Primary stable arthrodesis of the first ray gives a better short and medium term outcome than open reduction and internal fixation for Lisfranc injury with the first ray dislocation. Possible complication and revision could be avoided by primary arthrodesis for dislocated first ray injuries.


1996 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 242-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
George K Kiroff ◽  
David N McClure ◽  
John W Skelley

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1541-1544
Author(s):  
Giancarlo MC Domingues ◽  
Taise T da Silva ◽  
André Y Aihara ◽  
Fabiano N Cardoso ◽  
Virgílio O Barreto

Background Fibrocartilaginous coalition of the third tarsometatarsal joint has been indicated as an extremely rare form of tarsal coalition in the radiological literature, and most articles concerned with tarsal coalition do not mention involvement of this joint. Only two reports written in the English language that approach this subject were found, an orthopedic report and an anthropological report. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of this finding and discuss and illustrate the radiological characteristics of this coalition. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis of 614 computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans of the ankle and/or foot, acquired at a health service within a period of three months, was performed to assess the prevalence of this coalition. Results Of the examinations characterized as valid for analysis for the purposes of the study, 17 cases compatible with fibrocartilaginous coalition of the third tarsometatarsal joint were found, thus indicating an involvement of approximately 2.97% of the examined feet. Conclusion Our radiological findings are typical, and the prevalence found in this study was statistically significant, being similar to that described in the anthropological report (3.2%–6.8%).


Author(s):  
Nils F. Grauhan ◽  
Stefan M. Niehues ◽  
Robert A. Gaudin ◽  
Sarah Keller ◽  
Janis L. Vahldiek ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Training a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the most common causes of shoulder pain on plain radiographs and to assess its potential value in serving as an assistive device to physicians. Materials and methods We used a CNN of the ResNet-50 architecture which was trained on 2700 shoulder radiographs from clinical practice of multiple institutions. All radiographs were reviewed and labeled for six findings: proximal humeral fractures, joint dislocation, periarticular calcification, osteoarthritis, osteosynthesis, and joint endoprosthesis. The trained model was then evaluated on a separate test dataset, which was previously annotated by three independent expert radiologists. Both the training and the test datasets included radiographs of highly variable image quality to reflect the clinical situation and to foster robustness of the CNN. Performance of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the thereof derived AUC as well as sensitivity and specificity. Results The developed CNN demonstrated a high accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 for detecting fractures, 0.896 for joint dislocation, 0.945 for osteoarthritis, and 0.800 for periarticular calcifications. It also detected osteosynthesis and endoprosthesis with near perfect accuracy (AUC 0.998 and 1.0, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 and 0.86 for fractures, 0.95 and 0.65 for joint dislocation, 0.90 and 0.86 for osteoarthrosis, and 0.60 and 0.89 for calcification. Conclusion CNNs have the potential to serve as an assistive device by providing clinicians a means to prioritize worklists or providing additional safety in situations of increased workload.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document