Subconjunctival Gas Bubble Formation During LASIK Flap Creation Using Femtosecond Laser

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 850-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ide ◽  
George D. Kymionis ◽  
David A. Goldman ◽  
Sonia H. Yoo ◽  
Terrence P. O’Brien
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sloan W. Rush ◽  
Philip Cofoid ◽  
Ryan B. Rush

Purpose. To report the incidence and outcomes of anterior chamber gas bubble formation during femtosecond laser flap creation for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).Methods. The charts of 2,886 consecutive eyes that underwent femtosecond LASIK from May 2011 through August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence, preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed in subjects developing anterior chamber gas bubble formation during the procedure.Results. A total of 4 cases (0.14%) developed anterior chamber gas bubble formation during femtosecond laser flap creation. In all four cases, the excimer laser was unable to successfully track the pupil immediately following the anterior chamber bubble formation, temporarily postponing the completion of the procedure. There was an ethnicity predilection of anterior chamber gas formation toward Asians (p=0.0055). An uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 was ultimately achieved in all four cases without further complications.Conclusions. Anterior chamber gas bubble formation during femtosecond laser flap creation for LASIK is an uncommon event that typically results in a delay in treatment completion; nevertheless, it does influence final positive visual outcome.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1619-1622
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ide ◽  
Sonia H. Yoo ◽  
Richard K. Lee ◽  
Terrence P. OʼBrien

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (17) ◽  
pp. 10849-10856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Battistel ◽  
Christopher R. Dennison ◽  
Andreas Lesch ◽  
Hubert H. Girault

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1019-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zhou ◽  
J.-L. Tison ◽  
G. Carnat ◽  
N.-X. Geilfus ◽  
B. Delille

Abstract. We report on methane (CH4) dynamics in landfast sea ice, brine and under-ice seawater at Barrow in 2009. The CH4 concentrations in under-ice water ranged from 25.9 to 116.4 nmol L−1sw, indicating a supersaturation of 700 to 3100% relative to the atmosphere. In comparison, the CH4 concentrations in sea ice ranged from 3.4 to 17.2 nmol L−1ice and the deduced CH4 concentrations in brine from 13.2 to 677.7 nmol L−1brine. We investigated the processes underlying the difference in CH4 concentrations between sea ice, brine and under-ice water and suggest that biological controls on the storage of CH4 in ice were minor in comparison to the physical controls. Two physical processes regulated the storage of CH4 in our landfast ice samples: bubble formation within the ice and sea ice permeability. Gas bubble formation due to brine concentration and solubility decrease favoured the accumulation of CH4 in the ice at the beginning of ice growth. CH4 retention in sea ice was then twice as efficient as that of salt; this also explains the overall higher CH4 concentrations in brine than in the under-ice water. As sea ice thickened, gas bubble formation became less efficient, CH4 was then mainly trapped in the dissolved state. The increase of sea ice permeability during ice melt marked the end of CH4 storage.


2014 ◽  
pp. 1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iraklis Vastardis ◽  
Bojan Pajic ◽  
Zisis Gatzioufas ◽  
Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler ◽  
Farhad Hafezi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document