Is the Ambulatory Care Educational Program for Trainees of Residency Program Adequate to Meet Their Post-Training Clinical Performance Needs?: Assessment in Family Practice Residency Program of Tertiary Hospital

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-257
Author(s):  
Joon Seo Yoo ◽  
Yun Mi Song ◽  
Joo Yong Kim ◽  
Yoong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Won Park ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. S85
Author(s):  
Ebun O. Ebunlomo ◽  
Melanie Lazarus ◽  
Andrea Creamer ◽  
Lisa Hanley ◽  
Daniele Crooks ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 578-578
Author(s):  
JOSEPH W.ST. GEME

In Reply.— Klein expresses his point of view with clarity and intensity. That is important. I am optimistic about pediatrics and its future. That is important to me. I also believe that the optimism is reasonable. There is an increasing sense of competition between pediatrics and family medicine. The same seems to be true for internal medicine and family medicine. The competition in the spheres of educational program and clinical performance is healthy. We will continue to learn from each other and the roles of the pediatrician, internist, and family physician will evolve as a function of our knowledge, our clinical competence, the desires of our patients, and, perhaps, our enthusiasm about what we do.


1999 ◽  
Vol 92 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
Charmaine Martin ◽  
Ephraim Back

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
K.C. Innes ◽  
S. Chestnut ◽  
K. Schafer ◽  
A. Khazei

Introduction/Innovation Concept: Medical simulation is becoming increasingly useful for healthcare education. Simulation-based crisis resource management (CRM) has been shown to produce improvements in skill acquisition, communication and team behaviors. Simulation has become a key component of most Family Practice (FP) residency programs and many programs are moving towards developing formal simulation curriculums. The Coastal FP Residency is a relatively new and unique program with a large emphasis on rural medicine. Graduates have gone on to practice in remote areas with less access to supports for critically ill patients. Therefore, an effective simulation curriculum, focused on Emergency Medicine, is of great importance to this program. Methods: To develop our curriculum, Kern’s framework for medical education was selected given its prior success in similar endeavors. The first step of this approach involves a needs assessment, which we accomplished in the form of an online survey. The questionnaire included pre-defined topics pertaining to the training needs of FP Residents destined for Rural Practice with respect to technical skills, CRM skills, specific medical conditions and categories of medical conditions. Classification of answers included multiple choice, 5-point Likert scales as well as an option for free-text answers. The survey was distributed to pre-identified participants including stakeholders/educators within the Coastal FP residency program as well as simulation education leads for FP residencies throughout British Columbia (BC). Current residents, as well as program graduates were also asked to complete the survey. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: The results of this survey were used to develop formal goals and objectives which were in turn used to write or adapt 24 cases for the curriculum. Cases from categories (e.g. Pediatrics) rated as “Extremely Important” on the Likert scale were included proportionally more in the curriculum. The cases were also designed to assess/practice a higher proportion of CRM elements considered important and to address commonly identified difficulties in resuscitation. Cases were developed, where possible, using local or national guidelines and are currently in the stage of peer review (by a minimum of two peers). Conclusion: The curriculum will be implemented in July 2017 and we will transition towards the evaluation phase. Our goal is to develop and distribute formalized needs assessments to rural FP residencies across BC so that they may develop dynamic, formal curriculums of their own.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. e1-e6
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Lindsey ◽  
Laura L. Wayman ◽  
Etoi A. Garrison ◽  
Mario Davidson ◽  
Charlene M. Dewey

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in ophthalmology lists the use of information technology to optimize learning as a common program requirement. The use of technology in published studies often takes the form of e-learning. No study to date outlines what methods are preferred by residents and faculty in United States Ophthalmology programs. Objective We conducted a needs assessment to evaluate the current state of technology in teaching and learning in an ophthalmology residency program, to identify barriers to using technology, and to determine areas for future curriculum development. Methods We used an anonymous online survey to assess current residents and faculty within our ophthalmology residency program. Results Residents identified their primary learning styles as visual and kinesthetic and they preferred videos and online question banks.More than 35% of faculty respondents “never” use technology in teaching. Among faculty who do use technology, online quizzes and videos were the most common modalities used to supplement lectures. Common barriers to incorporating technology included lack of time, lack of knowledge of available technologic tools, and lack of skill in using technology.Both faculty and residents identified a Web platform for curricular elements and a feedback app as potentially beneficial additions to the curriculum. Each group rated an app to receive feedback more highly than an app to provide it. The two groups disagreed on the usefulness of online quizzes. There was variability among faculty responses regarding the usefulness of technology in teaching. Conclusion Our needs assessment identified areas of agreement among residents and faculty as well as mismatches and barriers regarding the use of technology to support learning by ophthalmology residents. Our study is an example of a best practice for use of a needs assessment to provide a framework for curriculum development and program improvement in an individual program. Further research is needed to generalize these results across ophthalmology programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document