scholarly journals RE-ESTABLISHING AMERICAN CHESTNUT ON MINED LANDS IN THE APPALACHIAN COALFIELDS

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Michael French ◽  
Chris Barton ◽  
Brian McCarthy ◽  
Carolyn Keiffer ◽  
Jeff Skousen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Castanea ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Robert G. Laport ◽  
David Smith ◽  
Julienne Ng

2021 ◽  
pp. 251484862110249
Author(s):  
Jessica C Barnes ◽  
Jason A Delborne

Innovations in genetics and genomics have been heavily critiqued as technologies that have widely supported the privatization and commodification of natural resources. However, emerging applications of these tools to ecological restoration challenge narratives that cast genetic technoscience as inevitably enrolled in the enactment and extension of neoliberal capitalism. In this paper, we draw on Langdon Winner’s theory of technological politics to suggest that the context in which genetic technologies are developed and deployed matters for their political outcomes. We describe how genetic approaches to the restoration of functionally extinct American chestnut trees—by non-profit organizations, for the restoration of a wild, heritage forest species, and with unconventional intellectual property protections—are challenging precedents in the political economy of plant biotechnology. Through participant observation, interviews with scientists, and historical analysis, we employ the theoretical lens provided by Karl Polanyi’s double movement to describe how the anticipations and agency of the developers of blight-resistant American chestnut trees, combined with chestnut biology and the context of restoration, have thus far resisted key forms of the genetic privatization and commodification of chestnut germplasm. Still, the politics of blight-resistant American chestnut remain incomplete and undetermined; we thus call upon scholars to use the uneven and socially constructed character of both technologies and neoliberalism to help shape this and other applications of genetic technoscience for conservation.


HortScience ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison D. Oakes ◽  
Tyler Desmarais ◽  
William A. Powell ◽  
Charles A. Maynard

Many hardwood tree species are being threatened by exotic pests, and for some, only genetic engineering can offer a solution before functional extinction occurs. An example of how genetic engineering can be a useful tool for forest restoration is the transgenic american chestnuts, which contain a wheat oxalate oxidase gene conferring resistance to the chestnut blight. Many hundreds of these trees are needed for field trials and eventual restoration plantings throughout its natural range, but production is bottlenecked because of the difficulty of making hardwood trees produce roots through micropropagation. The presence of roots and living shoot tips precede successful acclimatization of tissue culture-produced american chestnut plantlets. In these experiments, we attempted to improve the post-rooting stage of our american chestnut propagation protocol. We examined vessel type, hormone, and activated charcoal concentrations, and using a vermiculite substrate. For plantlets with the best combination of roots and living shoot tips we recommend using semisolid post-rooting medium containing 2 g·L−1 activated charcoal and 500 mg humic acid in disposable fast-food takeout containers. When using vermiculite as a substrate, adding 2.0 g·L−1 activated charcoal to post-rooting medium without a gelling agent was the preferred treatment. Improving the survival rates of the american chestnut plantlets will benefit the american chestnut restoration project by providing more plant material for both ecological studies and eventual restoration, since pursuit of a nonregulated status for these transgenic trees will require extensive field testing. These procedures may also be applicable to other difficult-to-root hardwood trees in transgenic programs, such as american butternut, white oak, and black walnut.


Forests ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1537-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Pinchot ◽  
Stacy Clark ◽  
Scott Schlarbaum ◽  
Arnold Saxton ◽  
Shi-Jean Sung ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda D. Polin ◽  
Haiying Liang ◽  
Ronald E. Rothrock ◽  
Mutsumi Nishii ◽  
Deborah L. Diehl ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo D. Fernando ◽  
Javonna L. Richards ◽  
Julie R. Kikkert

Science ◽  
1929 ◽  
Vol 70 (1822) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Kelley
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document