Stability Analysis of the Biot-Rayleigh and Double-Porosity Theories for Wave Propagation in Saturated Media

Author(s):  
L. Jiawei ◽  
G. Zhenwei ◽  
Y. Wen-An ◽  
L. Jianxin
2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (14) ◽  
pp. e2019348118
Author(s):  
Guillaume Vanderhaegen ◽  
Corentin Naveau ◽  
Pascal Szriftgiser ◽  
Alexandre Kudlinski ◽  
Matteo Conforti ◽  
...  

The classical theory of modulation instability (MI) attributed to Bespalov–Talanov in optics and Benjamin–Feir for water waves is just a linear approximation of nonlinear effects and has limitations that have been corrected using the exact weakly nonlinear theory of wave propagation. We report results of experiments in both optics and hydrodynamics, which are in excellent agreement with nonlinear theory. These observations clearly demonstrate that MI has a wider band of unstable frequencies than predicted by the linear stability analysis. The range of areas where the nonlinear theory of MI can be applied is actually much larger than considered here.


2020 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 103558
Author(s):  
Cătălin Galeş ◽  
Stan Chiriţă

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1554-1563 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Keller

Biot’s linear model of stress‐wave propagation in a fluid‐saturated elastic framework is combined with a linear theoretical description of an inelastic frame to describe fluid‐saturated media in terms of a composite model. The composite model, the Constant Q (CQ) model, assumes an inelastic frame with frequency‐dependent complex elastic moduli and results in a frame response that is causal with Q exactly independent of frequency. The influence of frame inelasticity on the composite‐model Type I (compression), Type II, and shear‐wave attenuation response is found to be greatest for high and low frequencies, considering a frequency range of [Formula: see text]. The model is most sensitive to variations in permeability and pore‐size parameter for both attenuation and phase‐velocity responses. Parameter variations showed little effect on shear‐wave attenuation for a fine to course sand‐size frame matrix, indicating a fluid mechanism is responsible for the influence seen in Type I and Type II attenuations. The CQ model results fit the experimentally measured values of Type I attenuation and velocity for a fully saturated fine‐grained frame material (clay‐silt size grains) and a fully saturated coarse‐grained frame material (fine to coarse sand‐size grains). For Type I velocity, the experimentally observed dispersion clearly distinguishes the CQ model as superior to composite models that include a nondispersive frame, since such models predict very little dispersion due only to interpore fluid mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document