From Barriers to Beginnings

2014 ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Aubry Threlkeld
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
New Media ◽  
Assistive Technology ◽  
School Contexts ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Internet Filters ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
Out Of School

The ubiquity of new media in the lives of young people with high-incidence disabilities raises two important questions: how can new media be used as Assistive Technology (AT) and what can new media offer that other technologies may not? This chapter attempts to answer these questions by discussing the shifting and dynamic barriers to making this transition while also illuminating convergences between the goals of new media and AT. While this chapter explicitly concentrates on opportunities within the classroom, educators can also employ the guidelines provided herein generally in out-of-school contexts. Barriers to be discussed include electronic curb cuts and aggressive Internet filters. After discussing such barriers, solutions, including some classroom protocols and a list of resources, are shared to help educators evaluate new media as well as in the integration of new and old media as AT.

Fix It With TAPE: Repurposing Technology to Be Assistive Technology for Students With High-Incidence Disabilities

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Jordan C. Shurr ◽  
Kinsey Tom ◽  
Andrea D. Jasper ◽  
Laura Bassette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assistive Technology ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities

Assistive Technology and Students With High-incidence Disabilities

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 298-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Yukiko Maeda ◽  
Sara M. Flanagan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Assistive Technology ◽  
Postsecondary Education ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Postschool Outcomes ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Transition Study ◽  
National Longitudinal Transition Study ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
Technology In School

Assistive technology use in secondary school and postschool has been shown to improve the educational attainment and life outcomes of students with high-incidence disabilities. This study used data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2—collected in the early to mid-2000s—to explore the relationship between receipt of assistive technology in school and postschool outcomes. Few students in this study reported receiving assistive technology in high school (7.8%) and fewer still after high school (1.1%). In general, students with high-incidence disabilities who reported receiving assistive technology in school had more positive postschool outcomes in terms of a paid job, wages, and participation in postsecondary education. Yet assistive technology receipt was not a statistically significant factor in the logistic regression model for any dependent variable (i.e., postschool outcome). Although positive implications for receipt of assistive technology in school were suggested, receipt was not a predictor for positive postschool outcomes.

Planning Computer Science Instruction for Students With High-Incidence Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 105345122110249
Author(s):  
Amy Hutchison ◽  
Anya S. Evmenova
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Universal Design For Learning ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Science Content ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Integration Planning ◽  
Content Area Instruction ◽  
Model Computer ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities

States increasingly are adopting computer science standards to help students develop coding and computational thinking skills. In an effort to support teachers in introducing computer science content to their students with high-incidence disabilities, a new model, computer science integration planning plus universal design for learning (CSIP+) offers ways to integrate computational thinking and coding into content area instruction. This column presents an example of how a teacher might implement the CSIP+ model when designing instruction accessible to all learners. Guiding questions to support teachers at each phase of the planning cycle are provided.

Critique and the video production classroom: providing students the skills to navigate new media literacies

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Nixon
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
New Media ◽  
Digital Media ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Video Production ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Content Type ◽  
New Media Literacy ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to demonstrate how teaching the discourse of critique, an integral part of the video production process, can be used to eliminate barriers for young people in gaining new media literacy skills helping more young people become producers rather than consumers of digital media. Design/methodology/approach This paper describes an instrumental qualitative case study (Stake, 2000) in two elective high school video production classrooms in the Midwestern region of the USA. The author conducted observations, video and audio recorded critique sessions, conducted semi-structured interviews and collected artifacts throughout production including storyboards, brainstorms and rough and final cuts of videos. Findings Throughout critique, young video producers used argumentation strategies to cocreate meaning, multiple methods of inquiry and questioning, critically evaluated feedback and synthesized their ideas and those of their peers to achieve their intended artistic vision. Young video producers used feedback in the following ways: incorporated feedback directly into their work, rejected and ignored feedback, or incorporated some element of the feedback in a way not originally intended. Originality/value This paper demonstrates how teaching the discourse of critique can be used to eliminate barriers for young people in gaining new media literacy skills. Educators can teach argumentation and inquiry strategies through using thinking guides that encourage active processing and through engaging near peer mentors. Classroom educators can integrate the arts-based practice of the pitch critique session to maximize the impact of peer-to-peer learning.

Sufficiency of Teachers’ Access to Resources and Supports for Students With Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 088840642110462
Author(s):  
Samantha A. Gesel ◽  
Lindsay Foreman-Murray ◽  
Allison F. Gilmour
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
General Educators ◽  
Release Time ◽  
Service Delivery Model ◽  
Teachers Experiences ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Using Data ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
And Training

Students with disabilities are served by both special and general educators, yet teachers often feel unprepared to meet the needs of these students in their classrooms. Using data from a nationally representative survey, we examined the sufficiency of teachers’ access to supports available for meeting the needs of students with high-incidence disabilities, their access to development opportunities, and the sources teachers used to access interventions. We explored differences in teachers’ experiences by grade band, service delivery model, and teacher preparation model. We found teachers of students with disabilities rated the sufficiency of access to supports between somewhat insufficient and somewhat sufficient, with the lowest ratings for planning/release time and training and information. Teachers reported greater rates of access to collaboration than professional development. Colleagues were sources for resources related to academic interventions and administrators were sources for nonacademic intervention resources. There were few significant differences in these results by teacher characteristics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document