Rethinking Knowledge Sharing Barriers

2016 ◽  
pp. 1857-1880
Author(s):  
Simon Cleveland ◽  
Timothy J. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Work Force ◽  
Organizational Knowledge ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Time Availability ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Knowledge Seeking

The current work force will not only lose 3.6 million “baby boomers” by 2020, but also a substantial organizational knowledge. Presently, there is a gap in understanding how to promote effective organizational knowledge sharing due to the limited awareness of factors that inhibit knowledge sharing behaviors. The focus of this article is to explore the most commonly noted barriers to employees' knowledge seeking and knowledge contributing practices and extract potential factors that influence these barriers. A content analysis study is performed on 103 knowledge management articles from ten computer and information science databases. The results demonstrate a clear division between the barriers limiting each specific behavior: knowledge seeking behaviors depend largely on the time availability of knowledge seekers, while poor communication skills and lack of trust appear to be the major inhibitors to knowledge contribution. Three main factors were found to influence these barriers: role conflict, role ambiguity and locus of control. The findings are consistent with the information foraging and social exchange theories. Implications for future research are proposed.

Rethinking Knowledge Sharing Barriers

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Cleveland ◽  
Timothy J. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Work Force ◽  
Organizational Knowledge ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Time Availability ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Knowledge Seeking

The current work force will not only lose 3.6 million “baby boomers” by 2020, but also a substantial organizational knowledge. Presently, there is a gap in understanding how to promote effective organizational knowledge sharing due to the limited awareness of factors that inhibit knowledge sharing behaviors. The focus of this article is to explore the most commonly noted barriers to employees' knowledge seeking and knowledge contributing practices and extract potential factors that influence these barriers. A content analysis study is performed on 103 knowledge management articles from ten computer and information science databases. The results demonstrate a clear division between the barriers limiting each specific behavior: knowledge seeking behaviors depend largely on the time availability of knowledge seekers, while poor communication skills and lack of trust appear to be the major inhibitors to knowledge contribution. Three main factors were found to influence these barriers: role conflict, role ambiguity and locus of control. The findings are consistent with the information foraging and social exchange theories. Implications for future research are proposed.

Understanding Social Capital Formation for Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities

2011 ◽  
pp. 136-155
Author(s):  
Shafiz A. Mohd Yusof
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Social Exchange Theory ◽  
Virtual Communities ◽  
Elementary Theory ◽  
Virtual Community ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
The Social

This chapter attempts to explore the possibility of building social capital in virtual community(VC) by first introducing the phenomenon, its problems and context, types of VCs and the significance of knowledge sharing. This chapter then presents the process of social capital from a sociological standpoint where two main theories will be used—the elementary theory of social structure and the social exchange theory as the backbone of the arguments. By integrating both theories, a conceptual framework that includes six antecedents to develop social capital is provided. Subsequently, the propositions are expressed in terms of implications to the sociological approach of VC and some conclusions are made by including some future research agenda.

Influences of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing in an Online Virtual Community

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 15-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoyun Liang ◽  
Chi-Cheng Chang ◽  
William Rothwell ◽  
Kuen-Ming Shu
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Culture ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Social Exchange Theory ◽  
Virtual Communities ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
Virtual Community ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Management Platform

The present study examined the influences and interactive effects of organizational culture, including trust, communication, and leadership, on online knowledge sharing based on social exchange theory and theories of trust, communication, and leadership. Two-hundred-ninety-seven members in three online engineering virtual communities from a knowledge management platform in a company were participants for filling in questionnaires. The results revealed that trust, communication, and leadership significantly affected online knowledge sharing. Members with high levels of trust, communication, or leadership had significantly better knowledge sharing than members with medium or low levels of trust, communication, or leadership. The results also showed a significant interactive effect of trust and communication on online knowledge sharing and a significant interactive effect of leadership and communication on online knowledge sharing, but there was no significant interactive effect of trust and leadership on online knowledge sharing. No previous studies have investigated the interactive effects of trust, communication and leadership on online knowledge sharing. That research finding is a significant contribution different from previous studies. Finally, this article offers suggestions for future research, implications of this study, and limitations of this study.

scholarly journals Knowledge sharing behavior: a critical thinking, implications and future agenda

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Santi Suryantini ◽  
Ni Putu Ayu Darmayanti ◽  
I Wayan Edi Arsawan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Knowledge Map

Introduction. Entering the industrial revolution 4.0 and society era 5.0, organizations are required to develop themselves based on intensive knowledge management. Organizations need, capture and represent knowledge, exchange and reuse it for different processes and applications, virtually creating an appropriate environment that stimulates the transfer and use of knowledge. This study provides insight into the importance of sharing knowledge in organizations while providing critical thinking to existing literature so that it can provide a new perspective in researching knowledge sharing. Aims and Task. The purpose of this study is to provide a structured and detailed analysis and knowledge map of knowledge-sharing practices based on approaches that can be used as the basis for research and analysis contributes to the importance of knowledge-sharing for improving the quality of team and organization management. Result. This study presents four gap management practices that can be used as a basis in research and analysis, contributing to the importance of sharing knowledge to improving the quality of management in teams and organizations. The first gap is about elaboration theory between resource-based view and social exchange theory, second about the divergence of the results of empirical studies where research on antecedents of knowledge sharing is mostly done at large companies, third is the substance of the practice of knowledge sharing in an organization, and fourth is the capability of human resources in conducting knowledge sharing practices. Conclusion. This research provides insight that knowledge sharing is a crucial element for the development of individuals, teams, and organizations. Knowledge plays an important role in intellectual capital inventory that can be used as knowledge creation, which is useful in improving employee competitiveness and skills, increasing manager's analysis of change and turbulence, improving business performance and competitive advantage of organizations to build superior performance. Future research is to examine the relationship of knowledge sharing with variables of organizational behavior, psychology, human resource practices, and strategic management.

How does individuals’ exchange orientation moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing?

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1622-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Xiao ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Task Performance ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Organizational Knowledge ◽  
Complex Relationship ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Exchange Ideology ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose This study aims to explore the complex relationship between leadership and organizational knowledge sharing by investigating the moderating role of exchange ideology on the relation between transformational leadership in attributed charisma and knowledge sharing and the influence of attributed charisma and knowledge sharing on task performance. The influence of leadership in organizational knowledge sharing process has been gradually highlighted. Design/methodology/approach Based on the review of relevant literature and survey, a structural equation model considering four factors in the model together is now constructed and provides four hypotheses which can be verified. Self-completed questionnaires were collected from 163 students in the context of a graduate class in China. Findings The findings illustrate the relationship between leadership theory and knowledge sharing from a perspective of social exchange theory. In particular, results show that both transformational leadership and knowledge sharing have positive impacts to task performance and for individuals with low exchange ideology the positive influence from attributed charisma to knowledge sharing is stronger. Originality/value This research introduces exchange ideology as a moderator and explains the complex relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing with sufficient proof. Transformational leadership in attributed charisma is more effective to those individuals with low exchange ideology in facilitating their knowledge effort. This paper can be theoretically and practically helpful to researchers and enterprise leaders in organizational knowledge management.

Understanding Social Capital Formation for Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities

2011 ◽  
pp. 2412-2432
Author(s):  
Shafiz A. Mohd Yusof
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Social Exchange Theory ◽  
Virtual Communities ◽  
Elementary Theory ◽  
Virtual Community ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
The Social

This chapter attempts to explore the possibility of building social capital in virtual community(VC) by first introducing the phenomenon, its problems and context, types of VCs and the significance of knowledge sharing. This chapter then presents the process of social capital from a sociological standpoint where two main theories will be used—the elementary theory of social structure and the social exchange theory as the backbone of the arguments. By integrating both theories, a conceptual framework that includes six antecedents to develop social capital is provided. Subsequently, the propositions are expressed in terms of implications to the sociological approach of VC and some conclusions are made by including some future research agenda.

Influences of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing in an Online Virtual Community

2017 ◽  
pp. 972-992
Author(s):  
Chaoyun Liang ◽  
Chi-Cheng Chang ◽  
William Rothwell ◽  
Kuen-Ming Shu
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Culture ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Social Exchange Theory ◽  
Virtual Communities ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
Virtual Community ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Management Platform

The present study examined the influences and interactive effects of organizational culture, including trust, communication, and leadership, on online knowledge sharing based on social exchange theory and theories of trust, communication, and leadership. Two-hundred-ninety-seven members in three online engineering virtual communities from a knowledge management platform in a company were participants for filling in questionnaires. The results revealed that trust, communication, and leadership significantly affected online knowledge sharing. Members with high levels of trust, communication, or leadership had significantly better knowledge sharing than members with medium or low levels of trust, communication, or leadership. The results also showed a significant interactive effect of trust and communication on online knowledge sharing and a significant interactive effect of leadership and communication on online knowledge sharing, but there was no significant interactive effect of trust and leadership on online knowledge sharing. No previous studies have investigated the interactive effects of trust, communication and leadership on online knowledge sharing. That research finding is a significant contribution different from previous studies. Finally, this article offers suggestions for future research, implications of this study, and limitations of this study.

Why Is Human Milk Donation Absent From the Literature on Philanthropic Giving? The Invisible Female Donor and Her Invisible Gift

2021 ◽  
pp. 089976402110139
Author(s):  
Ayelet Oreg ◽  
Susan Appe
Keyword(s):  
Human Milk ◽  
Infant Feeding ◽  
Research Note ◽  
Care Work ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Female Donor ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Milk Banks ◽  
The Invisible

In this research note, we call attention to human milk donation being essentially omitted from the philanthropy literature and bodily gifting research. We focus here on human milk donations for infant feeding through nonprofit milk banks. We argue that its omission is due to two main factors: (a) the incoherence of defining human milk donation and the challenges to its regulation and (b) its consideration as care work and the characteristics of the milk donor identity. We end with avenues for future research in this area.

scholarly journals Supervisor Knowledge Sharing and Employee Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Roles of Learning Goal Orientation and Affective Organizational Commitment

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 4176
Author(s):  
Seckyoung Loretta Kim
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Commitment ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Goal Orientation ◽  
Social Exchange ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Affective Organizational Commitment ◽  
Learning Goal ◽  
Learning Goal Orientation ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Relationship

Recognizing the importance of knowledge sharing, this study adopted social learning and social exchange perspectives to understand when employees may engage in knowledge sharing. Using data collected from 192 employees in various South Korean organizations, the findings demonstrate that there is a positive relationship between supervisor knowledge sharing and employee knowledge sharing. As employees perceive a high level of supervisor knowledge sharing, they are likely to engage in knowledge sharing based on social learning and social exchange theories. Furthermore, the study explores the moderating effects of learning goal orientation and affective organizational commitment in the relationship between supervisor knowledge sharing and employee knowledge sharing. The result supports the hypothesis that the relationship between supervisor knowledge sharing and employee knowledge sharing is strengthened when there is a high level of affective organizational commitment. Employees who obtain valuable knowledge from their supervisors are likely to engage in knowledge sharing when they are emotionally attached to their organization. However, in contrast to the hypothesis, the positive relationship between supervisor knowledge sharing and employee knowledge sharing was stronger at the lower levels of learning goal orientation (LGO) than at the higher levels of LGO.

scholarly journals The concept of neutrality: a new approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Macdonald ◽  
Briony Birdi
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Normative Framework ◽  
Contextual Awareness

Purpose Neutrality is a much debated value in library and information science (LIS). The “neutrality debate” is characterised by opinionated discussions in contrasting contexts. The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in the literature by bringing these conceptions together holistically, with potential to deepen understanding of LIS neutrality. Design/methodology/approach First, a literature review identified conceptions of neutrality reported in the LIS literature. Second, seven phenomenographic interviews with LIS professionals were conducted across three professional sectors. To maximise variation, each sector comprised at least one interview with a professional of five or fewer years’ experience and one with ten or more years’ experience. Third, conceptions from the literature and interviews were compared for similarities and disparities. Findings In four conceptions, each were found in the literature and interviews. In the literature, these were labelled: “favourable”, “tacit value”, “social institutions” and “value-laden profession”, whilst in interviews they were labelled: “core value”, “subservient”, “ambivalent”, and “hidden values”. The study’s main finding notes the “ambivalent” conception in interviews is not captured by a largely polarised literature, which oversimplifies neutrality’s complexity. To accommodate this complexity, it is suggested that future research should look to reconcile perceptions from either side of the “neutral non-neutral divide” through an inclusive normative framework. Originality/value This study’s value lies in its descriptive methodology, which brings LIS neutrality together in a holistic framework. This framework brings a contextual awareness to LIS neutrality lacking in previous research. This awareness has the potential to change the tone of the LIS neutrality debate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document