Animal-Assisted Therapy as a Treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Author(s):  
Nicola Claire Pellew

Research studies report that animal-assisted therapy (AAT) may be an effective alternative method for treating autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the presence of many methodological weaknesses and the limited replication of such studies have resulted in divided opinion on the actual effectiveness of AAT for treating ASD, and much hesitancy surrounding its use. Reliable clinically based studies must be conducted if this uncertainty is to be put to rest. Because these studies require the participation of physicians who are often hesitant to participate, it is suggested that leadership interventions be used as tools to encourage their participation in AAT research. This chapter aims to discuss the necessity for physician participation, the reasons for the lack of clinician participation in such research, and recommendations for encouraging physician and policymaker participation in specifically targeted research studies.

2020 ◽  
pp. 014544552096492
Author(s):  
Laura C. Chezan ◽  
Meka N. McCammon ◽  
Erik Drasgow ◽  
Katie Wolfe

Our main purpose in this review was to determine the extent to which ecological validity was demonstrated and assessed in single-case experimental design (SCED) studies examining the effectiveness of function-based interventions (FBIs) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within schools. We reviewed 55 SCED studies published between 1985 and 2019 to identify indicators of ecological validity and the instruments used to assess it. We also conducted an analysis to determine the extent to which implementation procedures were described. Results indicated that approximately half of the assessments and FBIs were conducted by teachers in classrooms. Approximately 50% of the assessments and FBIs were implemented within the context of isolated sessions and required multiple implementers. Ecological validity was assessed in seven of the studies reviewed. A complete description of implementation procedures was provided for approximately half of the assessments and FBIs. Limitations of the present review and future directions for research are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 4492-4503
Author(s):  
Maeve Doyle London ◽  
Lynette Mackenzie ◽  
Meryl Lovarini ◽  
Claire Dickson ◽  
Alberto Alvarez-Campos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document