How to Foster Technology-Enhanced Learning in Higher Education

2019 ◽  
pp. 402-416
Author(s):  
Martin Ebner ◽  
Timotheus Hell ◽  
Markus Ebner
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Participatory Approach ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Research Administration ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
University Of Technology ◽  
Integration Of Technology ◽  
Enhanced Learning

In this chapter, the authors deal with the topic of integration of technology-enhanced learning in higher education. Due to the worldwide debate on digitalization for all possible areas, even educational institutions are asking how they can deal with this change or how they have to prepare for the future. At Graz University of Technology, a pre-project was started to elaborate a policy, which should help to start different projects afterwards. Therefore, a participatory approach was started following the idea that each university member (lecturers, researchers, administrators, or students) can give input. Different measurements divided into the fields of education, research, administration, and transformation were carried out, summarized, and consolidated to provide a final policy. The outcome of this publication will focus on the description of the whole process as well as the summary of the most interesting aspects which were used for the final policy. Furthermore, an outlook on how the digital policy will be brought to practice in the following years will be provided.

Technology-Enhanced Learning in Higher Education

2014 ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Gordon ◽  
Mike Brayshaw
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Support Teams ◽  
Technological Adoption ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Integration Of Technology ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Technological Age ◽  
Enhanced Learning ◽  
Technology In Higher Education

This chapter explores issues that affect the uptake and integration of Technology in Higher Education, developing a framework to overcome some of the barriers. Technological adoption varies across disciplines. The authors consider disciplines as tribes, where some find technology acceptable and an enabler, whilst for others it is alien and deemed inappropriate. Some territories reflect technology as an area to defend and expand, whilst for others the imposition of technology and associated practices are considered a hostile intrusion into discipline practice. Within the framework, the authors reflect on various perspectives: practitioners', students', and support teams' perspectives within the wider eco-systems and structures. Practitioner concerns reflect discipline traditions and practices, from teaching through to assessment and how to manage the Wikipedia generation. Students' needs in a technological age reflect the demands of the Netizen as student, and the rise and challenge of MOOCs to the teacher and the learner. Institutional mechanisms provide the situation for the use of technology. The authors provide a framework within which to explore the above concerns and describe mechanisms to unite the academic tribes, to see the territorial boundaries as artificial and counter-productive, and to enable the utilisation of E-Learning in current and future Higher Education settings.

scholarly journals The MOOC Revolution – massive open online courses: the answer to problems facing education or an experiment that could destroy centuries of tradition.

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Jewitt
Keyword(s):  
New Technologies ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Massive Open Online Courses ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Massive Open Online ◽  
Traditional Teaching Methods ◽  
Cautionary Tales ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Given the emerging nature of massive open online courses (MOOCs), this paper is a synthesis of critical reflections, commentaries and cautionary tales from a variety of perspectives, looking at the issues facing education and considering whether traditional teaching methods have outlived their usefulness.In times where educational institutions are facing financial cuts and student debt increases, some argue free university online courses will be the saviour of education, (Koller et al, 2013). Others argue they could destroy centuries of tradition and threaten some of the world's greatest universities (Vardi 2012).This paper, builds on the research by examining some of the phenomenal changes to technology enhanced learning, being brought about by new technologies and business. It summarises some of the key discourses around MOOCs, which continue to generate heated debates and divide opinions about their credibility, value and importance. I argue that any form of technology that drives engaging and tailored education, precisely to the needs of the individuals, coupled with opening up education to those that cannot afford it, has to be a viable alternative and make traditional, academic institutions question their offerings and respond.  

Measuring and Profiling Self-Regulated Learning in the Online Environment

2010 ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Barnard-Brak ◽  
William Y. Lan ◽  
Valerie Osland Paton
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Cognitive Perspective ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

While the presence of technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs) will only increase in higher education, this book chapter examines current literature concerning the measurement of online SRL behaviors and the application of this online SRL measurement with regard to profiling SRL behaviors in TELEs. The methodologies and issues associated with the measurement of SRL behaviors in TELEs is discussed in view of extant research. The organization of SRL behaviors into five, distinct profiles is then discussed in view of a social cognitive perspective concerning the development of SRL (e.g. Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001). The book chapter concludes with recommendations for future research concerning the presence of SRL profiles and their relationship to other metacognitive factors and academic achievement.

scholarly journals Experiences and perspectives of Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education – Serbian case

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 1351-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Ivanović ◽  
Aleksandra Klašnja Milićević ◽  
Veljko Aleksić ◽  
Brankica Bratić ◽  
Milinko Mandić
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Teaching In Higher Education ◽  
Enhanced Learning

scholarly journals A Model for Discussing the Quality of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Blended Learning Programmes

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Casanova ◽  
António Moreira
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Face To Face Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

This paper presents a comprehensive model for supporting informed and critical discussions concerning the quality of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Blended Learning programmes. The model aims to support discussions around domains such as how institutions are prepared, the participants' background and expectations, the course design, and the learning process. The research that supported the design of this model was framed by a Grounded Theory method, combining different approaches to empirical data collection with a review of evaluation models on aspects of the quality of Online and Distance Learning. Throughout the paper, arguments are made that Higher Education institutions need to be more critical with regard to the use of Technology-Enhanced Learning, and to support it as a counterpart to face-to-face learning and teaching. The model provides a framework for teachers in Higher Education to reflect and discuss the quality of Technology-Enhanced Learning in their Blended Learning programmes.

scholarly journals Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dolores R. Serrano ◽  
Maria Auxiliadora Dea‐Ayuela ◽  
Elena Gonzalez‐Burgos ◽  
Alfonso Serrano‐Gil ◽  
Aikaterini Lalatsa
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Forschungsfeld Learning Analytics

i-com ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Amine Chatti ◽  
Anna Lea Dyckhoff ◽  
Ulrik Schroeder ◽  
Hendrik Thüs
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Learning Analytics ◽  
Future Trend ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Research Opportunities ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Process Learning ◽  
Enhanced Learning

Summary Learning analytics has attracted a great deal of attention in technology enhanced learning (TEL) in recent years as educational institutions and researchers are increasingly seeing the potential that learning analytics has to support the learning process. Learning analytics has been identified as a possible key future trend in learning and teaching (Johnson et al., 2011). Analytics can be a powerful tool to support learning. There are, however, a number of issues that need to be addressed before starting analytics projects. In this paper, we identify various challenges and research opportunities in the emerging area of learning analytics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document