Green Thumb Educating

In this chapter, the author presents the metaphor Green Thumb Educating to describe a culturally responsive approach common amongst culturally responsive educators in literature. Through this culturally responsive approach, students are empowered and held to high expectations and supported through rigorous academic obstacles. The author demonstrates how educators' beliefs about developing positive and meaningful rapport with children shapes their culturally responsive approach. The author makes the case that culturally responsive educators, also known as Green Thumb Educators, approach the teaching and learning process by first prioritizing the development of meaningful relationships with students. Culturally responsive educators approach culturally and linguistically diverse students like ESL learners by creating a sense of belonging in their classroom through the development of meaningful relationships.

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Amber N. Warren

This article examines online discussions during a teacher education class for experienced teachers seeking licensure in teaching English learners. It seeks to understand experienced teachers’ constructions of culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Using discourse analysis to emphasize talk as situated and action-oriented, the article indicates how belief claims expressed during experienced teachers’ online discussions construct specific versions of what it means to be a CLD student. Findings further suggest that participants managed their authority to speak about students’ needs in patterned ways. These findings have implications for teaching and learning, particularly for the preparation of experienced teachers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Peterson ◽  
Stephen Showalter

This paper describes why special education teachers are needed to meet the needs of the increasing number of culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities in the United States.  The paper presents innovative approaches to recruiting and training culturally responsive special education teachers.


Education ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan C. Faircloth

Historically, the academic performance of many culturally and linguistically diverse students has tended to lag behind that of their peers. This has been attributed by some as a failure of the educational system to meet these students’ academic, social, and emotional needs. Increasing diversity within the school-aged population demands that schools respond to the needs and abilities of these students. Central to these efforts is a commitment to the preparation, recruitment, and retention of a teaching force capable of acknowledging and respecting the unique learning abilities and needs of their students. Emerging in the1990s, the term “culturally responsive pedagogies” (CRP), often interchanged with the term “culturally relevant pedagogies,” has been used to describe the knowledge, skills, and dispositions characteristic of teachers who embrace the role of cultural and linguistic diversity within the teaching and learning environment. Teachers who engage in culturally responsive practices view their students’ cultural and linguistic diversity as strengths rather than deficits. Culturally responsive teachers build on their students’, and their families’/communities’ unique strengths as they work to develop effective educational practices for students from diverse backgrounds. Although hailed as a marker of effective teaching for culturally and linguistically diverse students, there is limited large-scale empirical evidence documenting the actual impact of CRP on students’ academic performance, leading some to question the utility of such practices. Given the highly contentious nature of the early-21st-century educational system it is imperative that increased research be conducted to document the impact of CRP on students’ academic experiences and subsequent outcomes.


Author(s):  
Marjorie Curry

Using the Ready for Rigor framework, Zaretta Hammond’s book Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students gives educators a neuroscience-based approach to closing the achievement gap. The Ready for Rigor framework consists of four strands: awareness, learning partnerships, information processing, and community building. Acknowledging that all four strands are paramount to culturally responsive teaching but restricting focus to information processing, this session will give participants examples of and strategies for making their mathematics lessons more culturally responsive. More specifically, participants will learn to game-ify it, story-ify it, and make it social.


2005 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janette K. Klingner ◽  
Alfredo J. Artiles ◽  
Elizabeth Kozleski ◽  
Beth Harry ◽  
Shelley Zion ◽  
...  

In this article, we present a conceptual framework for addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education. The cornerstone of our approach to addressing disproportionate representation is through the creation of culturally responsive educational systems. Our goal is to assist practitioners, researchers, and policy makers in coalescing around culturally responsive, evidence-based interventions and strategic improvements in practice and policy to improve students’ educational opportunities in general education and reduce inappropriate referrals to and placement in special education. We envision this work as cutting across three interrelated domains: policies, practices, and people. Policies include those guidelines enacted at federal, state, district, and school levels that influence funding, resource allocation, accountability, and other key aspects of schooling. We use the notion of practice in two ways, in the instrumental sense of daily practices that all cultural beings engage in to navigate and survive their worlds, and also in a technical sense to describe the procedures and strategies devised for the purpose of maximizing students’ learning outcomes. People include all those in the broad educational system: administrators, teacher educators, teachers, community members, families, and the children whose opportunities we wish to improve.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Sandy K. Bowen ◽  
Silvia M. Correa-Torres

America's population is more diverse than ever before. The prevalence of students who are culturally and/or linguistically diverse (CLD) has been steadily increasing over the past decade. The changes in America's demographics require teachers who provide services to students with deafblindness to have an increased awareness of different cultures and diversity in today's classrooms, particularly regarding communication choices. Children who are deafblind may use spoken language with appropriate amplification, sign language or modified sign language, and/or some form of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document