Analyzing Strategic Stance in Public Services Management

Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon ◽  
Martin Kitchener

This chapter describes the utilization of an uncertain reasoning-based technique in public services strategic management analysis. Specifically, the nascent NCaRBS technique (developed from Dempster-Shafer theory) is used to categorize the strategic stance of each state’s public long-term care (LTC) system to prospector, defender or reactor. Missing values in the data set are termed ignorant evidence and withheld in the analysis rather than transformed through imputation. Optimization of the classification of states, using trigonometric differential evolution, attempts to minimize ambiguity in their prescribed stance but not the concomitant ignorance that may be inherent. The graphical results further the elucidation of the uncertain reasoning-based analysis. This method may prove a useful means of moving public management research towards a state where LTC system development can be benchmarked and the relations between strategy processes, content, and performance examined.

Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon

The notion of uncertain reasoning has grown relative to the power and intelligence of computers. From sources which are uncertain information and/or imprecise data, it is importantly the ability to represent uncertainty and reason about it (Shafer & Pearl, 1990). A very general problem of uncertain reasoning is how to combine information from independent and partially reliable sources (Haenni & Hartmann,forthcoming). With data mining, understanding the confirming and/or conflicting information from characteristics describing objects classified to given hypotheses is affected by their reliability. Further, the presence of missing values compounds the problem, since the reasons for their presence may be external to the incumbent reliability issues (Olinsky, Chen, & Harlow, 2003; West, 2001). These issues are demonstrated here using the classification technique: Classification and Ranking Belief Simplex (CaRBS), introduced in Beynon and Buchanan (2004) and Beynon (2005). CaRBS operates within the domain of uncertain reasoning, namely in its accommodation of ignorance, due to its mathematical structure based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence (DST) (Srivastava & Mock, 2002). The ignorance here encapsulates incompleteness of the data set (presence of missing values), as well as uncertainty in the evidential support of characteristics to the final classification of the objects. This chapter demonstrates that a technique such as CaRBS, through uncertain reasoning, is able to uniquely manage the presence of missing values by considering them as a manifestation of ignorance, as well as allowing the possible unreliability of characteristics to be inherent. Importantly, the described process removes the need to falsely transform the data set in any way, such as through imputation (Huisman, 2000). The example issue of credit ratings considered here has become increasingly influential since its introduction in around 1900 with the Manual of Industrial and Miscellaneous Securities (Levich, Majnoni, & Reinhart, 2002). The rating agencies shroud their operations in particular secrecy, stating that statistical models cannot be used to replicate their ratings (Singleton & Surkan, 1991), hence advocating the need for alternative analyses, including those utilising uncertain reasoning.


2008 ◽  
pp. 2943-2963
Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon

The efficacy of data mining lies in its ability to identify relationships amongst data. This chapter investigates that constraining this efficacy is the quality of the data analysed, including whether the data is imprecise or in the worst case incomplete. Through the description of Dempster-Shafer theory (DST), a general methodology based on uncertain reasoning, it argues that traditional data mining techniques are not structured to handle such imperfect data, instead requiring the external management of missing values, and so forth. One DST based technique is classification and ranking belief simplex (CaRBS), which allows intelligent data mining through the acceptance of missing values in the data analysed, considering them a factor of ignorance, and not requiring their external management. Results presented here, using CaRBS and a number of simplex plots, show the effect of managing and not managing of imperfect data.


Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon

The efficacy of data mining lies in its ability to identify relationships amongst data. This chapter investigates that constraining this efficacy is the quality of the data analysed, including whether the data is imprecise or in the worst case incomplete. Through the description of Dempster-Shafer theory (DST), a general methodology based on uncertain reasoning, it argues that traditional data mining techniques are not structured to handle such imperfect data, instead requiring the external management of missing values, and so forth. One DST based technique is classification and ranking belief simplex (CaRBS), which allows intelligent data mining through the acceptance of missing values in the data analysed, considering them a factor of ignorance, and not requiring their external management. Results presented here, using CaRBS and a number of simplex plots, show the effect of managing and not managing of imperfect data.


Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon

This chapter investigates the effectiveness of a number of objective functions used in conjunction with a novel technique to optimise the classification of objects based on a number of characteristic values, which may or may not be missing. The classification and ranking belief simplex (CaRBS) technique is based on Dempster-Shafer theory and, hence, operates in the presence of ignorance. The objective functions considered minimise the level of ambiguity and/or ignorance in the classification of companies to being either failed or not-failed. Further results are found when an incomplete version of the original data set is considered. The findings in this chapter demonstrate how techniques such as CaRBS, which operate in an uncertain reasoning based environment, offer a novel approach to object classification problem solving.


2009 ◽  
pp. 236-253
Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon

This chapter demonstrates intelligent data analysis, within the environment of uncertain reasoning, using the recently introduced CaRBS technique that has its mathematical rudiments in Dempster-Shafer theory. A series of classification and ranking analyses are undertaken on a bank rating application, looking at Moody’s bank financial strength rating (BFSR). The results presented involve the association of each bank to being low or high BFSR, with emphasis is on the graphical exposition of the results including the use of a series of simplex plots. Throughout the analysis there is discussion on how the present of ignorance in the results should be handled, whether it should be excluded (belief) or included (plausibility) in the evidence supporting the classification or ranking of the banks.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Porębski ◽  
Ewa Straszecka

Abstract The paper presents a study on data-driven diagnostic rules, which are easy to interpret by human experts. To this end, the Dempster-Shafer theory extended for fuzzy focal elements is used. Premises of the rules (fuzzy focal elements) are provided by membership functions which shapes are changing according to input symptoms. The main aim of the present study is to evaluate common membership function shapes and to introduce a rule elimination algorithm. Proposed methods are first illustrated with the popular Iris data set. Next experiments with five medical benchmark databases are performed. Results of the experiments show that various membership function shapes provide different inference efficiency but the extracted rule sets are close to each other. Thus indications for determining rules with possible heuristic interpretation can be formulated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 155014771989455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang Gao ◽  
Yong Deng

Nuclear safeguards evaluation is a complicated issue with many missing values and uncertainties. By invoking Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence, the missing values are assigned to a subset of a set of multiple objects, at the same time, by combining different evaluation values, and the effect of uncertainty will be decreased. In this way, both the missing values and uncertainties are considered in the final evaluations. This method has been used in considering the International Atomic Energy Agency experts’ evaluation for nuclear safeguards. The result shows that ([Formula: see text], 0.1897) is the biggest belief degree.


Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Beynon ◽  
Cathy Holt ◽  
Gemma Whatling

Uncertain reasoning is closely associated with the pertinent analysis of data where there may be imprecision, inexactness, and uncertainty in its information content. In computer modelling, this should move any analysis to be inclusive of such potential uncertainty, away from the presumption of perfect data to be worked with. The nascent Classification and Ranking Belief Simplex (CaRBS) technique employed in this chapter enables analysis in the spirit of uncertain reasoning. The operational rudiments of the CaRBS technique are based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, affording the presence of ignorance in any analysis undertaken. An investigation of Total Hip Arthraplasty (THA), concerned with hip replacements, forms the applied problem around which the uncertain reasoning based analysis using CaRBS is exposited. The presented findings include the levels of fit in constructed models, and the contribution of features within the models. Where appropriate, numerical calculations are shown, to illustrate this novel form of analysis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Ladislav Beranek

This work describes the design of a decision support system for detection of fraudulent behavior of selling stolen goods in online auctions. In this system, each seller is associated with a type of certification, namely “proper seller,” “suspect seller,” and “selling stolen goods.” The certification level is determined on the basis of a seller’s behaviors and especially on the basis of contextual information whose origin is outside online auctions portals. In this paper, we focus on representing knowledge about sellers in online auctions, the influence of additional information available from other Internet source, and reasoning on bidders’ trustworthiness under uncertainties using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. To demonstrate the practicability of our approach, we performed a case study using real auction data from Czech auction portal Aukro. The analysis results show that our approach can be used to detect selling stolen goods. By applying Dempster-Shafer theory to combine multiple sources of evidence for the detection of this fraudulent behavior, the proposed approach can reduce the number of false positive results in comparison to approaches using a single source of evidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document