From Old Institutional Economics to New Institutional Economics

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Ilkben Akansel
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Economics ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Left Wing ◽  
Historical Aspect ◽  
Mainstream Economics ◽  
The Us

Since different kinds of economics thoughts have been explored, few have been as peculiar as Old Institutional Economics (OIE) and New Institutional Economics (NIE). It is curious that almost every stream criticizing mainstream economics has a left wing. OIE, not a big fan of this, criticizes neoclassical economics/mainstream economics, given it arose in the US. OIE had no sense to left wing, on the contrary, it created an effect criticizing neoclassical economics in its core. Unlike OIE, NIE has many common points with neoclassical economics. NIE has several new aspects different from neoclassical economics, as it has chosen a completely different path than OIE. In this chapter, authors scrutinize circumstances that led to OIE, and what separated OIE and NIE. A brief, successively historical aspect is also provided.

Governing the Environment: the Intitutional Economics Approach

2009 ◽  
pp. 61-86
Author(s):  
Arild Vatn
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Specific Area ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Institutional Perspective ◽  
Institutional Structures ◽  
Plural Rationalities ◽  
Jel Classifications

- Analyzing environmental governance implies foremost to analyze institutional structures and their implications. In doing so, the present paper utilizes insights primarily from the tradition of classical institutional economics. The paper is divided in three. In the first part I describe the main features of the classical position and compare it briefly with that of neoclassical economics and the tradition of new institutional economics. In the second part I clarify what is considered the main aspects of governance as seen from an institutional perspective. In part three I move to the more specific area of environmental governance. The concept of resource regimes is defined. Moreover I analyze how different regimes influence which environmental problems appear and how they can be treated. I discuss how institutions influence the formation and articulation of knowledge and values, how they form and protect interests, how they influence the level of transaction costs and hence the possibilities for coordination, and finally how they form the motivations underlying human choices in concrete contexts. Given that all these variables are shown to be endogenous to the institutional system, the use of comparative analysis in the assessment of various governance options is emphasized.Keywords: classical institutional economics, interdependence, resource regimes, value articulation, interest protection, transaction costs, plural rationalities.JEL classifications: B52; Q50; D02; D70.

The future of new institutional economics: from early intuitions to a new paradigm?

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLAUDE MÉNARD ◽  
MARY M. SHIRLEY
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Economics ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Success Story ◽  
Policy Debates ◽  
The Future ◽  
Nobel Laureates ◽  
Analytical Tools

Abstract:The trajectory of institutional economics changed in the 1970s when new institutional economics (NIE) began to take shape around some relative vague intuitions which eventually developed into powerful conceptual and analytical tools. The emergence of NIE is a success story by many measures: four Nobel laureates in less than 20 years, increasing penetration of mainstream journals, and significant impacts on major policy debates. This rapid acceptance is remarkable when we consider that it was divided from birth into distinct schools of thought. What will be the future of NIE? Will it be quietly absorbed by mainstream theory, or will it radically transform neoclassical economics into a new paradigm that includes institutions? To address these questions, we follow the sometimes-bumpy road to NIE's current successes and ponder the challenges that lie ahead.

Blood, Sweat, and Tears: The Rise and Decline of the East German Economy, 1949–1988 / Blut, Schweiß, Tränen: Aufstieg und Niedergang der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft, 1949–1988

2000 ◽  
Vol 220 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Blum ◽  
Leonard Dudley
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Foreign Capital ◽  
German Economy ◽  
Economic Structure ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Economic Decline ◽  
East German

SummaryThe rise of the East-German economy in the 1950s and 1960s and its decline in the 1970s and 1980s is difficult to explain by neoclassical economics. However; the observed life cycle may be explained by the inclusion of concepts from old and new institutional economics and from functional economics. Three distinct periods may be identified. During the “blood” period of forced development and autocratic rule, the information system and the system of property rights were roughly compatible with the economic structure. Then, in the “sweat” period, an attempt to overtake the capitalistic societies failed. Finally, in the “tears” period, economic decline could only be disguised by unsustainable inflows of foreign capital. This institutional explanation of the East-German collapse is tested with data for the period 1949-1988 and cannot be rejected.

scholarly journals Comparative institutional law and economics: reclaiming economics for socio-legal research

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-393
Author(s):  
Lyubomira Gramcheva
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Law And Economics ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Chicago School ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Scholarship

Law and economics is a controversial method of legal research, increasingly popular among some legal scholars but disliked by many others. The author discusses some of the objections raised by lawyers (as well as some economists) and argues that most of these are caused by the employment of the wrong economics on the respective side of the conjoined field. She contrasts neoclassical economics, made extremely popular by the Chicago school and Professor Richard Posner in particular, with New Institutional Economics and argues that the latter can overcome the difficulties presented by the former. While neoclassical economics seems to introduce additional problems to legal scholarship, New Institutional Economics neatly matches law’s own methodological tenets. However, the analysis will remain incomplete unless a third element is added to the mix: comparative law. Thus, the author calls for the development of Comparative Institutional Law and Economics, which provides an improved explanatory methodology.

Neoclassical economics and new institutional economics

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alirat Olayinka Agboola
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Property Market ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Representative Study ◽  
Philosophical Orientations

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the provisions of both the neoclassical economics and new institutional economics theses and assesses the implications of their methodologies for property market analysis. Design/methodology/approach – This research is based on secondary literature review and desk-based study. Findings – It is argued that new institutional economics, grounded on firmer foundations of human behaviour, offers an analytical approach to the study of the property market which emphasizes the institutionally contingent nature of real estate exchange, thus placing real estate within its socio-economic context. Originality/value – In-depth examination and juxtaposition of the provisions, assumptions, philosophical orientations and limitations of these main traditions of economic thought towards the achievement of a representative study of the workings of the property market.

The enduring relevance of the model Platonism critique for economics and public policy

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
DARRELL ARNOLD ◽  
FRANK P. MAIER-RIGAUD
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Economic Research ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Economic Modelling ◽  
Mainstream Economics ◽  
Research Programmes ◽  
Hans Albert

Abstract:The article briefly introduces Hans Albert and the basic elements of his critique of neoclassical economics as a form of ‘model Platonism’. The two most important elements of his general methodological critique of economics – namely the institutional vacuum inherent in much economic modelling and its unrealistic assumptions about behaviour – are introduced. It is argued that these specific critiques have been taken up with varying degrees of success in areas of economic research such as institutional economics and in behavioural and experimental research programmes. However, the fundamental methodological gist of his critique remains as pertinent to mainstream economics as it was when originally formulated. The influence of ‘model Platonic’ thinking remains pervasive in academia and also in public policy.

Rhetoric of the New Institutional Economics

2010 ◽  
pp. 81-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Raskov
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Rhetorical Analysis ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Mainstream Economics ◽  
Scientific Rhetoric

The article provides a rhetorical analysis of the New Institutional Economics based on the works of its main representatives - R. Coase, O. Williamson and D. North. The author exposes the specific features of scientific rhetoric characteristic for each of these scientists, reconstructs their biographies and shows, how and why their theories came to be integrated into mainstream economics.

The Relationship Between Old Institutional Economics (OIE) and Feminist Economics

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Ilkben Akansel
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Heterodox Economics ◽  
Feminist Economics ◽  
Mainstream Economics ◽  
Philosophy Of Economics ◽  
The Relationship

Economics and philosophy has a deep connection. It sometimes intertwined with each other whether economics needs philosophy or not. Philosophy of economics is a neccessity in order to understand the circumstances behind the economics events. Comprehension of such a neccessity can be complicated on certain occasions because of neoclassical economics thought. Neoclassical economics is also described as mainstream economics. This has long been a debate that critisizes mainstream economics. All followers critisizing mainstream economics are characterized as heterodox economics. Two of the fundemantal heterodox economics concepts are institutional economics and feminist economics. This study will therefore scrutinize mainstream economics in terms of the idea of old institutional economics and feminist economics.

scholarly journals The market for the “old” and the “new” institutional economics

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
ADRIANO JOSÉ PEREIRA ◽  
HERTON CASTIGLIONI LOPES
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Cost ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Transaction Cost Economics ◽  
New Institutional Economics ◽  
Mainstream Economics ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Contractual Approach ◽  
Determining Factor

ABSTRACT This paper conceives of the market as an institution, and contrasts two theoretical approaches: Institutionalism, with an evolutionary and analytical bias, whose theoretical basis comes from “Old/Original” Institutionalism, and New Institutional Economics, with an analytical, contractual approach, linked to mainstream economics. Both approaches have given relevant contributions, as they consider the importance of institutions for economic performance. The limits of New Institutional Economics are particularly relevant, whose analysis of the operation of markets is centered on the logic of transaction cost economics as a determinant of economic performance. Evolutionary Institutionalism, in turn, sees the market within a broader scope, in which cost economies only partially explains economic performance, but it is not necessarily seen as a determining factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document