ASIF Approach to Solve the Green Traveling Salesman Problem

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Haroun Sabry ◽  
Jamal Benhra ◽  
Abdelkabir Bacha
Keyword(s):  
Objective Function ◽  
Ant Colony Optimization ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Traveling Salesman Problem ◽  
Real World ◽  
Transportation Problem ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Traveling Salesman ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The City

The present article describes a contribution to solve transportation problems with green constraints. The aim is to solve an urban traveling salesman problem where the objective function is the total emitted CO2. We start by adapting ASIF approach for calculating CO2 emissions to the urban logistics problem. Then, we solve it using ant colony optimization metaheuristic. The problem formulation and solving will both work under a web-based mapping platform. The selected problem is a real-world NP-hard transportation problem in the city of Casablanca.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Sub-Tour Elimination Methods for the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem Applying the SECA Method

Axioms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Ramin Bazrafshan ◽  
Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Hashemkhani Zolfani ◽  
S. Mohammad J. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem
Keyword(s):  
Traveling Salesman Problem ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Traveling Salesman ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem ◽  
Simultaneous Evaluation ◽  
Mcdm Method ◽  
The Traveling Salesman Problem

There are many sub-tour elimination constraint (SEC) formulations for the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Among the different methods found in articles, usually three apply more than others. This study examines the Danzig–Fulkerson–Johnson (DFJ), Miller–Tucker–Zemlin (MTZ), and Gavish–Graves (GG) formulations to select the best asymmetric traveling salesman problem (ATSP) formulation. The study introduces five criteria as the number of constraints, number of variables, type of variables, time of solving, and differences between the optimum and the relaxed value for comparing these constraints. The reason for selecting these criteria is that they have the most significant impact on the mathematical problem-solving complexity. A new and well-known multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) method, the simultaneous evaluation of the criteria and alternatives (SECA) method was applied to analyze these criteria. To use the SECA method for ranking the alternatives and extracting information about the criteria from constraints needs computational computing. In this research, we use CPLEX 12.8 software to compute the criteria value and LINGO 11 software to solve the SECA method. Finally, we conclude that the Gavish–Graves (GG) formulation is the best. The new web-based software was used for testing the results.

An Improved Ant Colony System Based on Negative Biased

2010 ◽  
Vol 439-440 ◽  
pp. 558-562
Author(s):  
Jin Qiu Yang ◽  
Jian Gang Yang ◽  
Gen Lang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Convergence Rate ◽  
Ant Colony Optimization ◽  
Traveling Salesman Problem ◽  
Traveling Salesman ◽  
Ant Colony ◽  
Ant Colony System ◽  
Ant System

Ant System (AS) was the first Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm, which converged too slowly and consumed huge computation. Among the variants of AS, Ant Colony System (ACS) was one of the most successful algorithms. But ACS converged so rapidly that it always was in early stagnation. An improved Ant Colony System based on Negative Biased (NBACS) was introduced in the paper to overcome the early stagnation of the ACS. Experiments for Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) showed that better solutions were obtained at the same time when the convergence rate accelerated more rapidly.

Particle Swarm Optimization Combined with Ant Colony Optimization for the Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem

2009 ◽  
Vol 626-627 ◽  
pp. 717-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Kui Feng ◽  
Jin Song Bao ◽  
Jin Ye
Keyword(s):  
Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Ant Colony Optimization ◽  
Traveling Salesman Problem ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Traveling Salesman ◽  
Ant Colony ◽  
Great Success ◽  
Swarm Optimization ◽  
Continuous Space ◽  
Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem

A lot of practical problem, such as the scheduling of jobs on multiple parallel production lines and the scheduling of multiple vehicles transporting goods in logistics, can be modeled as the multiple traveling salesman problem (MTSP). Due to the combinatorial complexity of the MTSP, it is necessary to use heuristics to solve the problem, and a discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm is employed in this paper. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) in the continuous space has obtained great success in resolving some minimization problems. But when applying PSO for the MTSP, a difficulty rises, which is to find a suitable mapping between sequence and continuous position of particles in particle swarm optimization. For overcoming this difficulty, PSO is combined with ant colony optimization (ACO), and the mapping between sequence and continuous position of particles is established. To verify the efficiency of the DPSO algorithm, it is used to solve the MTSP and its performance is compared with the ACO and some traditional DPSO algorithms. The computational results show that the proposed DPSO algorithm is efficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document