Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation from the Epicardial Sites for Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating from the Left Ventricular Summit—Two Case-Reports—

Objective. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for cardiac arrhythmias including complex and ventricular arrhythmias. Remote magnetic catheter navigation (RMN) has been developed as a novel way of approach aiming to improve outcome and reduce complication rate, and reduce radiation exposure for both operator and patient. Our aim was to compare success and complication rate in patients with or without severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed all the patients (n = 98) which have undergone RMN in our center between 2015-2021. No selection criteria for RMN procedure have been applied. All clinical and paraclinical, as well as procedural data were collected. Patients were divided into two groups, with or without severely reduced LVEF ≤ 35%. CARTO system was used for 3D electroanatomic mapping. RMN was done using Niobe ES system and an open-irrigated magnetic ablation catheter. Success rate was deﬁ ned by complete elimination of clinical arrhythmia. Non-inducibility following ablation was assessed in all patients presenting with any type of ventricular arrhythmia other than premature ventricular contractions. Testing for inducibility was done by ventricular programmed pacing with up to four extra-stimuli. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. P-value < 0.05 was considered signiﬁ cant. Results. Successful ablation with complete elimination of the clinical arrhythmia was achieved in 92.3% of the patients with severely reduced LVEF and in 88.1% of patients with LVEF > 35% (p = 0.73). Overall minor complication rate was 2.04% with spontaneous resolution. No major complications were reported. Non-inducibility was achieved in 56.4% of the patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and in 79.2% of the patients with LVEF >35% (p = 0.023). Conclusion. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using RMN is effective and safe regardless of the presence or not of a severely reduced LVEF.

Download Full-text

Minimising radiation exposure in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12872-021-02120-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Matevž Jan ◽

David Žižek ◽

Tine Prolič Kalinšek ◽

Dimitrij Kuhelj ◽

Primož Trunk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Catheter Ablation ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽

Major Complication ◽

Structural Heart Disease ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Complex Nature ◽

Group 2 ◽

Procedural Outcomes ◽

Group 1

Abstract Background Conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment option for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, with the complex nature of most procedures, patients and staff bare an increased radiation exposure. Near-zero or zero-fluoroscopy CA is an alternative method which could substantially reduce or even eliminate the radiation dose. Our aim was to analyse procedural outcomes with fluoroscopy minimising approach for treatment of VAs in patients with structurally normal hearts (SNH) and structural heart disease (SHD). Methods Fifty-two (age 53.4 ± 17.8 years, 38 male, 14 female) consecutive patients who underwent CA of VAs in our institution between May 2018 and December 2019 were included. Procedures were performed primarily with the aid of the three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system and intra-cardiac echocardiography. Fluoroscopy was considered only in left ventricular (LV) summit mapping for coronary angiography and when epicardial approach was planned. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were analysed. Results Sixty CA procedures were performed. Twenty-five patients had SHD-related VAs (Group 1) and 27 patients had SNH (Group 2). While Group 1 had significantly higher total procedural time (256.9 ± 71.7 vs 123.6 ± 42.2 min; p < 0.001) compared to Group 2, overall procedural success rate [77.4% (24/31) vs 89.7% (26/29); p = 0.20)] and recurrence rate after the first procedure [8/25, (32%) vs 8/27, (29.6%); p = 0.85] were similar in both groups. Fluoroscopy was used in 3 procedures in Group 1 where epicardial approach was needed and in 4 procedures in Group 2 where LV summit VAs were ablated. Overall procedure-related major complication rate was 5%. Conclusions Fluoroscopy minimising approach for CA of VAs is feasible and safe in patients with SHD and SNH. Fluoroscopy could not be completely abolished in VAs with epicardial and LV summit substrate location.

Download Full-text