A Design Method for Two-Degree-of-Freedom Simple Multi-Period Repetitive Control Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ando ◽  
Tatsuya Sakanushi ◽  
Kou Yamada ◽  
Iwanori Murakami ◽  
Takaaki Hagiwara ◽  
...  

The multi-period repetitive (MPR) control system is a type of servomechanism for periodic reference inputs. Using MPR controllers, transfer functions from the reference input to the output and from the disturbance to the output of the MPR control system have infinite numbers of poles. To specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristic easily, Yamada and Takenaga proposed MPR control systems, named simple multi-period repetitive (simple MPR) control systems, where these transfer functions have finite numbers of poles. In addition, Yamada and Takenaga clarified the parameterization of all stabilizing simple MPR controllers. However, using the simple MPR repetitive controller by Yamada and Takenaga, we cannot specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristic separately. From the practical point of view, it is desirable to specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristic separately. The purpose of this paper is to propose the parameterization of all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom (TDOF) simple MPR controllers that can specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristic separately.

2011 ◽  
Vol 497 ◽  
pp. 255-269
Author(s):  
Zhong Xiang Chen ◽  
Kou Yamada ◽  
Nobuaki Nakazawa ◽  
Iwanori Murakami ◽  
Yoshinori Ando ◽  
...  

Multi-period repetitive controllers improve the disturbance attenuation characteristic of themodified repetitive control system that follows the periodic reference input with small steady stateerror. Recently, the parameterization of all stabilizing multi-period repetitive controllers was studied.However, when the parameterization of all stabilizing multi-period repetitive controllers is used, theinput-output characteristic and the feedback characteristic cannot be specified separately. From thepractical point of view, it is desirable to specify the input-output characteristic and the feedback characteristicseparately. In addition, the parameterization is useful to design stabilizing controllers. Fromthis view-point, the parameterization of all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitivecontrollers those can specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristicseparately was solved by Yamada et al. However, when we design a stabilizing two-degree-offreedommulti-period repetitive controllers using the parameterization proposed by Yamada et al, thefrequency characteristic of the control system cannot be settled so easily. From the practical point ofview, the frequency characteristic of the control systems are required to be easily settled. This problemcan be solved by obtaining the parameterization of all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom multi-periodrepetitive controllers with the specified frequency characteristic. In this paper, we propose the parameterizationof all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitive controllers with thespecified frequency characteristic.


2010 ◽  
Vol 459 ◽  
pp. 194-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kou Yamada ◽  
Nobuaki Nakazawa ◽  
Iwanori Murakami ◽  
Yoshinori Ando ◽  
Takaaki Hagiwara ◽  
...  

Multi-period repetitive controllers improve the disturbance attenuation characteristic of the modified repetitive control system that follows the periodic reference input with a small steady state error. Recently, the parameterization of all stabilizing multi-period repetitive controllers was studied. However, when the parameterization of all stabilizing multi-period repetitive controllers is used, the input-output characteristic and the feedback characteristic cannot be specified separately. From the practical point of view, it is desirable to specify the input-output characteristic and the feedback characteristic separately. In addition, the parameterization is useful to design stabilizing controllers. Therefore, the problem of obtaining the parameterization of all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitive controllers that can specify the input-output characteristic and the disturbance attenuation characteristic separately is important to solve. In this paper, we propose the parameterization of all stabilizing two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitive controllers.


Author(s):  
Tatsuya Hoshikawa ◽  
Kou Yamada ◽  
Yuko Tatsumi

When a plant can be stabilized by using a stable controller, the controller is said to be a strongly stabilizing controller. The importance of strong stabilizations is to solve some problems occurred by using unstable stabilizing controllers, for example, feedback control systems become high sensitive for disturbances. Parameterizations of all strongly stabilizable plants and of all stable stabilizing controllers have already proposed. However, stable stabilizing controllers designed by using their parameterization cannot specify the input-output characteristic and the feedback characteristic separately. One of the ways to specify these characteristics separately is to use a twodegree-of-freedom control system. However, the parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers has not been examined. The purpose of this paper is to propose the parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers for strongly stabilizable plants.


2013 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Li Xiang Zhang

PID control systems are the most commonly used control technology in industries. However, there are issues on control performances for the unstable process with time delays. In order to improve the control performances of PID control systems, a new two degree of freedom model driven PID control system is introduced in this paper and it is used to the unstable processes with time delay. The model driven PID control is capable of stabilizing with unstable processes by using PD feedback, regulating quickly for disturbance and tracking quickly to the change of set point. With case studies comparing with conventional PID control systems was done.


Aerospace ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Lam ◽  
W. H. Liao

Transmissibilities for two-degree-of-freedom (2DoF) passive systems have been extensively investigated in the past. However, for semi-active control systems, the transmissibilities are rarely analyzed. The expressions of non-dimensional transmissibilities for the semi-active control systems are not found. There are no closed-form transfer functions for general semi-active control systems. The control algorithms for semi-active systems need to be specified first. Therefore, three reference systems (skyhook, groundhook, and their hybrid) are proposed. These equivalent systems are the references for the semi-active control systems to achieve. In this paper, the 2DoF skyhook, groundhook and hybrid systems for semi-active control are studied. The displacement and acceleration transmissibilities of those three reference systems are formulated and analyzed. Their transmissibilities are also compared with the passive system. Each of reference systems is classified as Ideal and Non-Ideal systems. The differences between the Ideal and Non-Ideal systems are also discussed. The optimal systems and their corresponding parameters are identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document