Combination of Active and Passive Seismic Analyses for Embankment Characterization

2015 ◽  
Vol 771 ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yekti Widyaningrum ◽  
Sungkono ◽  
Alwi Husein ◽  
Bagus Jaya Santosa ◽  
Ayi S. Bahri

Rayleigh wave dispersion is intensively used to determine near surface of shear wave velocity (Vs). The method has been known as non-invasive techniques which is costly effective and efficient to characterize subsurface. Acquisition of the Rayleigh wave can be approached in two ways, i.e. passive and active. Passive seismic is accurate to estimate dispersion curve in low frequency, although it is not accurate for high frequency. While active seismic is vice versa of passive seismic. The high frequency of Rayleigh wave dispersion reflects to near surface and vice versa. Therefore, we used the combination of both passive and active seismic method to overcome the limitations of each method. The Vs which is resulted by inversion of the combining data gives accurate model if compared to log and standard penetration test (N-SPT) data. Further, the approach has been used to characterize LUSI (Lumpur Sidoarjo) embankments. The result shows that embankment material (0-12 m) has higher Vs than that lower embankment material.

1960 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Jack Oliver ◽  
Maurice Major

ABSTRACT The PL phase is a normally dispersed train of waves of periods greater than about 10 seconds beginning at or near the time of the initial P wave and sometimes continuing at least to the time of the beginning of the Rayleigh-wave train. With adequate instrumentation the PL phase is commonly observed at distances less than about 25° from shallow shocks. In general, surface particle motion is elliptical and progressive, and amplitudes are not greater than about one-quarter those of Rayleigh waves of the same period. Comparison of PL- and Rayleigh-wave dispersion shows that both waves propagate in roughly the same near-surface wave guide. Whereas Rayleigh waves correspond to normal- (nonleaking-) mode propagation, PL waves appear to correspond to leakingmode propagation within this wave guide.


Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 782-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen S. Beaty ◽  
Douglas R. Schmitt

Rayleigh‐wave dispersion is used to study the near‐surface elastic properties of a thick, lacustrine clay to approximately 10 m depth. Ten repeated sets of Rayleigh dispersion curves were obtained through late spring to early fall. A variety of methodologies were used to extract the dispersion curves, but a modified frequency–ray parameter (f − p) method most successfully yields dispersion curves for the first three Rayleigh modes. The Rayleigh‐wave velocities varied from 100 to ∼350 m/s with frequency over the band from 75 to 10 Hz. Over this band, these velocities did not measurably vary during the study period. The observed phase velocity curves were inverted with P‐wave and density values obtained from shallow coring to obtain the shear‐wave velocity structure at the site down to > 14 m. This case study highlights the robust, repeatable, nature of surface wave dispersion methods when care is taken in the acquisition of field data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document