Failure Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Column Using Cohesive and Adhesive Interfaces

2006 ◽  
Vol 321-323 ◽  
pp. 716-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Kyu Rhee ◽  
Hee Up Lee ◽  
Jun S. Lee ◽  
Woo Kim

This study examines the performance of adhesive and cohesive interfacial crack model in assessing the brittle shear behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns. The quarter-scale reinforced concrete columns tested at the University of California at San Diego by Xiao et al. (1993) to explore the ductility of reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loading. The three columns R-1, R-3 and R-5 with different transverse reinforcement are considered for finite element failure analysis.

Author(s):  
M. J. Nigel Priestley ◽  
Frieder Seible

Structural deficiencies in flexural and shear strength, and in ductility capacity of reinforced concrete columns of Californian bridges have required the development of effective and economic retrofit solutions. The paper describes relevant research at the University of California San Diego, and presents design recommendations based on rather extensive test results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 1250015 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAT RUANGRASSAMEE ◽  
ARCHAWIN SAWAROJ

When reinforced-concrete columns are subjected to lateral cyclic loading, columns usually suffer failures at plastic hinges. If the buckling of longitudinal reinforcements at plastic hinges can be prevented or delayed, columns are expected to carry gravity loads at a higher ductility level. In this study, the rebar-restraining collar (RRC) was developed to improve the post-buckling behavior of longitudinal reinforcements. The behavior was investigated under monotonic loading tests of reinforcing bars with the RRCs and the cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns with and without RRCs. From the monotonic loading test, it was found that the RRCs significantly improved the post-yielding behavior of longitudinal reinforcing bars. The ductility and energy dissipation of longitudinal reinforcing bars with RRCs was significantly higher than that of the bare bar. Then, cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns were conducted. The cross section of columns was 0.4 m × 0.4 m, and the effective height was 2.15 m. The ratio of longitudinal reinforcing bars was 0.0123, and the volumetric ratio of transverse reinforcement was 0.00424. The column with RRCs did not have buckling of longitudinal reinforcements and had the ductility enhancement of about 17%, comparing to the column without RRCs. One evident benefit of using the RRCs is to control damage at plastic hinges of columns. Hence, the repair cost of columns after an earthquake can be reduced.


2015 ◽  
Vol 764-765 ◽  
pp. 1189-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ha Lee ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Kyeong Jin Kim ◽  
Soo Bong Park

3D nonlinear impact analysis of a reinforced concrete bridge column under truck impact loadings was performed in this study. Three different boundary conditions were considered in order to investigate the effect of superstructures for the integral column during the impact. A fixed condition at bottom and restrained in a loading direction at top (Model I) showed the largest damaged area and dominant failure mode of the column was shear. However, Model II (Model I with released at top) showed smaller damage and dominant failure modes were flexure rather than shear. In Model III, it was found that the superstructure intensifies the shear and flexural damages to the column due to the dynamic movement of the superstructures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document