Realistic Reference for Evaluation of Vehicle Safety Focusing on Pedestrian Head Protection Observed From Kinematic Reconstruction of Real-World Collisions

Head-to-vehicle contact boundary condition and criteria and corresponding thresholds of head injuries are crucial in evaluation of vehicle safety performance for pedestrian protection, which need a constantly updated understanding of pedestrian head kinematic response and injury risk in real-world collisions. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to investigate the characteristics of pedestrian head-to-vehicle contact boundary condition and pedestrian AIS3+ (Abbreviated Injury Scale) head injury risk as functions of kinematic-based criteria, including HIC (Head Injury Criterion), HIP (Head Impact Power), GAMBIT (Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold), RIC (Rotational Injury Criterion), and BrIC (Brain Injury Criteria), in real-world collisions. To achieve this, 57 vehicle-to-pedestrian collision cases were employed, and a multi-body modeling approach was applied to reconstruct pedestrian kinematics in these real-world collisions. The results show that head-to-windscreen contacts are dominant in pedestrian collisions of the analysis sample and that head WAD (Wrap Around Distance) floats from 1.5 to 2.3 m, with a mean value of 1.84 m; 80% of cases have a head linear contact velocity below 45 km/h or an angular contact velocity less than 40 rad/s; pedestrian head linear contact velocity is on average 83 ± 23% of the vehicle impact velocity, while the head angular contact velocity (in rad/s) is on average 75 ± 25% of the vehicle impact velocity in km/h; 77% of cases have a head contact time in the range 50–140 ms, and negative and positive linear correlations are observed for the relationships between pedestrian head contact time and WAD/height ratio and vehicle impact velocity, respectively; 70% of cases have a head contact angle floating from 40° to 70°, with an average value of 53°; the pedestrian head contact angles on windscreens (average = 48°) are significantly lower than those on bonnets (average = 60°); the predicted thresholds of HIC, HIP, GAMBIT, RIC, BrIC2011, and BrIC2013 for a 50% probability of AIS3+ head injury risk are 1,300, 60 kW, 0.74, 1,470 × 104, 0.56, and 0.57, respectively. The findings of the current work could provide realistic reference for evaluation of vehicle safety performance focusing on pedestrian protection.

Instrumentation Results of New Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Crash Tested Barriers for William P. Lane, Jr. Bridge

Two new bridge barriers were crash tested in accordance with AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) guidelines for future use on the William P. Lane Bridge over the Chesapeake Bay: (1) a combination barrier consisting of a reinforced concrete parapet with a top steel rail evaluated for Test Level 4 (TL-4); and (2) a combination barrier consisting of a steel parapet with a top steel rail evaluated for test levels TL-4 and TL-5. For the first test configuration, the reinforced concrete barrier was attached to a representative overhang deck slab using anchor rods. In the vicinity of the vehicle impact points, load cells were installed to measure forces in anchor bolts, and strain gauges were attached to reinforcing bars to resolve measured strain data into forces through the overhang deck slab. In the second test configuration, the steel barrier was supported by evenly spaced representative floorbeams using a bolted base plate connection. Strain gauges were attached to elements of the barrier at support locations adjacent to the vehicle impact point to evaluate force transfer through the barrier system into the base plate connections. Linear potentiometers were installed to measure lateral dynamic deflection of the barrier near the vehicle impact region. This paper presents the analysis results of the force, strain, and displacement data measured in the barrier and deck structural components during crash load testing.