Infection Rates in Intensive Care Units by Electrocardiographic Lead Wire Type: Disposable vs Reusable

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Albert ◽  
E. Slifcak ◽  
J. D. Roach ◽  
J. F. Bena ◽  
G. Horvath ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1079-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hangsheng Liu ◽  
Carolyn T. A. Herzig ◽  
Andrew W. Dick ◽  
E. Yoko Furuya ◽  
Elaine Larson ◽  
...  




Author(s):  
S Bello ◽  
EA Bamgboye ◽  
DT Ajayi ◽  
EN Ossai ◽  
EC Aniwada ◽  
...  

Background: Compliance with handwashing in busy healthcare facilities, such as intensive care units (ICUs), is suboptimal and alcohol hand-rub preparations have been suggested to improve compliance. There is no evidence on the comparative effectiveness between handwash and hand-rub strategies. This systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of handwash versus hand-rub strategies for preventing nosocomial infection in ICUs. Methods Studies conducted in ICUs and indexed in PubMed comparing the clinical effectiveness and adverse events between handwash and hand-rub groups were included in a systematic review. The primary outcome was nosocomial infection rates. Secondary outcomes included microbial counts on healthcare providers’ hands, mortality rates, patient/hospital cost of treatment of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), length of ICU/hospital stays, and adverse events. Studies were independently screened and data extracted by at least two authors. Meta-analyses of risk ratios (RR), incidence rate ratios (IRR), odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD), were conducted using the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Seven studies published between 1992-2009 and involving a total of 11,663 patients were included. Five studies (10,981 patients) contributed data to the ICU acquired nosocomial infection rates. The pooled IRR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.61, 0.82; I2 = 94%). On sensitivity analysis, pooled IRR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.32, 0.48; 4 studies; 8,247 patients; I2 = 0%) in favour of hand rub. The pooled OR for mortality was 0.95 (95% CI 0.78, 1.61; 4 studies; 3,475 patients; I2 = 39%). The pooled MD for length of hospital stay was -0.74 (95% CI -2.83, 1.34; 3 studies; 741 patients; I2 = 0%). The pooled OR for an undesirable skin effect was 0.37 (95% CI 0.23, 0.60; 3 studies;1504 patients; I2 = 0%) in favour of hand rub. Overall quality of evidence was low. Conclusion: Hand rub appeared more effective when compared to handwash in ICUs.



2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihnsook Jeong ◽  
Soonmi Park ◽  
Jae Sim Jeong ◽  
Duck Sun Kim ◽  
Young Sun Choi ◽  
...  


2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ector Jaime Ramirez Barba ◽  
Victor Daniel Rosenthal ◽  
Francisco Higuera ◽  
Martha Sobreyra Oropeza ◽  
Hector Torres Hernández ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Viet Hung ◽  
Phan Thi Hang ◽  
Victor D. Rosenthal ◽  
Le Thi Anh Thu ◽  
Le Thi Thu Nguyet ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1206-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Leighton ◽  
M. Cortina-Borja ◽  
M. Millar ◽  
S. Kempley ◽  
R. Gilbert


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 143A
Author(s):  
William C. Wallace ◽  
Wendi Gornick ◽  
Michael E. Lekawa ◽  
Alexander Di Stante ◽  
Sherry Burchell ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cecilia Bardossy ◽  
Rachna Jayaprakash ◽  
Anjali C. Alangaden ◽  
Patricia Starr ◽  
Odaliz Abreu-Lanfranco ◽  
...  

Application of the new 2015 NHSN definition of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in intensive care units reduced CAUTI rates by ~50%, primarily due to exclusion of candiduria. This significant reduction in CAUTI rates resulting from the changes in the definition must be considered when evaluating effectiveness of CAUTI prevention programs.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:239–241



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document