NorMoor JIP, Mooring Design Code Calibration

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torfinn Hørte ◽  
Siril Okkenhaug ◽  
Øivind Paulshus
Keyword(s):  
1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Harman ◽  
A. G. Davenport ◽  
W. S. S. Wong

A procedure is described for calculating two statistics, the mean and the coefficient of variation, for largest live load effects in a bridge structure caused by highway traffic during a reference period. These statistics are pertinent in the selection of highway live loads and calibration of a statistically based design code. The reference period depends on the limit state being calibrated.Using weights and dimensions of trucks from a 1982 survey in Ontario, congested traffic moving through one bridge length is repeatedly simulated for various “truck densities.” Herein truck density is the number of trucks on a length of highway divided by the maximum number that could occupy the length. When simulating traffic of one density crossing one influence line, the largest structural effect per traffic move has a frequency distribution that, with reasonable accuracy, is idealized as Gaussian.Observed multiple truck presence is modelled by a modified Poisson distribution that has three parameters. For one set of these traffic parameters, mean largest structural effects are shown to vary in a consistent manner with truck density, truck volume, and one parameter characterizing the tributary area of the effect. Based on these observations, more concise procedures for simulation and calculation are recommended. Key words: statistics, probability, truck survey, bridge loads, structural effects, bridge design, code calibration.


1991 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bong Koo Han ◽  
Hyo Nam Cho ◽  
Sung Pil Chang

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1311-1318
Author(s):  
Hosoon Choi ◽  
Sung-Gul Hong ◽  
Young Hak Lee ◽  
Heecheul Kim ◽  
Dae-Jin Kim

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5474
Author(s):  
Tuomo Poutanen

This article addresses the process to optimally select safety factors and characteristic values for the Eurocodes. Five amendments to the present codes are proposed: (1) The load factors are fixed, γG = γQ, by making the characteristic load of the variable load changeable, it simplifies the codes and lessens the calculation work. (2) Currently, the characteristic load of the variable load is the same for all variable loads. It creates excess safety and material waste for the variable loads with low variation. This deficiency can be avoided by applying the same amendment as above. (3) Various materials fit with different accuracy in the reliability model. This article explains two options to reduce this difficulty. (4) A method to avoid rounding errors in the safety factors is explained. (5) The current safety factors are usually set by minimizing the reliability indexes regarding the target when the obtained codes include considerable safe and unsafe design cases with the variability ratio (high reliability/low) of about 1.4. The proposed three code models match the target β50 = 3.2 with high accuracy, no unsafe design cases and insignificant safe design cases with the variability ratio 1.07, 1.03 and 1.04.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 738
Author(s):  
Nicola Rossi ◽  
Mario Bačić ◽  
Meho Saša Kovačević ◽  
Lovorka Librić

The design code Eurocode 7 relies on semi-probabilistic calculation procedures, through utilization of the soil parameters obtained by in situ and laboratory tests, or by the means of transformation models. To reach a prescribed safety margin, the inherent soil parameter variability is accounted for through the application of partial factors to either soil parameters directly or to the resistance. However, considering several sources of geotechnical uncertainty, including the inherent soil variability, measurement error and transformation uncertainty, full probabilistic analyses should be implemented to directly consider the site-specific variability. This paper presents the procedure of developing fragility curves for levee slope stability and piping as failure mechanisms that lead to larger breaches, where a direct influence of the flood event intensity on the probability of failure is calculated. A range of fragility curve sets is presented, considering the variability of levee material properties and varying durations of the flood event, thus providing crucial insight into the vulnerability of the levee exposed to rising water levels. The procedure is applied to the River Drava levee, a site which has shown a continuous trend of increased water levels in recent years.


Author(s):  
Daigo Watanabe ◽  
Kiminobu Hojo

This paper introduces an example of structural integrity evaluation for Light Water Reactor (LWR) against excessive loads on the Design Extension Condition (DEC). In order to assess the design acceptance level of DEC, three acceptance criteria which are the stress basis limit of the current design code, the strain basis limit of the current design code and the strain basis limit by using Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method were applied. As a result the allowable stress was increased by changing the acceptance criteria from the stress basis limit to the strain basis limit. It is shown that the practical margin of the LWR’s components still keeps even on DEC by introducing an appropriate criterion for integrity assessment and safety factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document