scholarly journals Traumatic events involving elderly patients treated with anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: the downside of stroke prevention

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Riccardi ◽  
Pierangela Minuto ◽  
Maria Ghinatti ◽  
Grazia Guiddo ◽  
Alessandro Calvia ◽  
...  

A group of oral anticoagulant-treated patients affected by permanent atrial fibrillation was evaluated after their access to the emergency room as a result of a traumatic accident. In these patients, the re-evaluation of their risk of thromboembolism and bleeding was performed together with the evaluation of their risk of falling and institutionalization. Results show that the emergency department identifies a cohort of very elderly frail patients, who should be carefully reconsidered for anticoagulant therapy after a traumatic event.

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110467
Author(s):  
Yutao Guo ◽  
Agnieszka Kotalczyk ◽  
Jacopo F Imberti ◽  
Yutang Wang ◽  
Gregory YH Lip ◽  
...  

Background Advancing age is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of all-cause death/any thromboembolism and the impact of oral anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in very elderly (≥85 years) Chinese atrial fibrillation patients. Methods The ChiOTEAF is a prospective registry proceeded in 44 sites from 20 provinces in China between October 2014 and December 2018. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, any thromboembolism, major bleeding, and new onset/worsening heart failure. Results The eligible cohort for this analysis included 6416 patients and 1215 (18.9%) patients were aged ≥85 years. Only 320 (26.4%) very elderly patients were treated with oral anticoagulant, of whom 205 (64.1%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, while antiplatelet therapy was used among 642 (53.1%) very elderly patients. On multivariate analysis, the use of oral anticoagulant was an independent predictor of a lower risk of the composite outcome (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32–0.66) and all-cause death (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32–0.69) among these very elderly atrial fibrillation patients. Conclusions Advanced age should not be a reason to withhold oral anticoagulant, since the use of oral anticoagulants is safe and improves survival.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L Yarbrough ◽  
Erin Brown ◽  
Nneka Ezunagu ◽  
Karen Gonzalez ◽  
Nicole Leonard ◽  
...  

Background: Despite high efficacy in clinical trials for stroke prevention, oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains vastly underutilized in real world practice. Earlier studies have suggested that important subgroups (elderly, women, blacks) may be especially prone to under treatment. Our objective was to examine the patterns of antithrombotic medication use following an AF-related stroke within a Stroke Clinical Network. The Stroke Clinical Network consists of nine stroke centers located in rural, suburban and urban geographical regions. Methods: The GWTG registry was queried (calendar years 2014-2018) to identify ischemic stroke patients discharged with AF and age, gender, race and discharge antithrombotic medications. We evaluated patterns of medication use across the entire network and also among women, elderly patients (>80 years), and blacks vs. whites. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess statistical differences between subgroups. Results: Among 7,483 IS patients 1,406 had a diagnosis of AF: 70% were White, 25% Black; mean age of 76.9 years (SD +/-12.25 years) with 50% women. In the entire group, the rate of OAC use at discharge was 62%, with no difference based upon sex (p=0.55). Among patients receiving OAC treatment, women had a higher rate of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescription (53% vs. 48%, p=0.049). There were differences in antithrombotic practices based on age (< 80, mean age 70 years, >80 mean age 86.9 years). In patients <80 years, 68% received OAC therapy, compared to 52% in the elderly group (p<0.0001). Black patients were younger than white patients (70 years vs. 79.3 years) and more likely to receive OAC treatment (71% vs. 60%, p=0.0003). Conclusions: In a geographically diverse Stroke Network, we identified that OAC treatment is underutilized following an AF-related stroke, especially in elderly patients. This analysis will provide the Stroke Clinical Network an opportunity to develop interventions to target patient subgroups with low OAC treatment rates. With the aging of the US population, innovative methods are needed to improve the rate of OAC use in elderly patients with AF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratika Parkash ◽  
Kirk Magee ◽  
Mark McMullen ◽  
Michael Clory ◽  
Michel D’Astous ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document