scholarly journals Processing of emotional faces in social phobia

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Risløv Staugaard ◽  
Nicole Kristjansen Rosenberg

Previous research has found that individuals with social phobia differ from controls in their processing of emotional faces. For instance, people with social phobia show increased attention to briefly presented threatening faces. However, when exposure times are increased, the direction of this attentional bias is more unclear. Studies investigating eye movements have found both increased as well as decreased attention to threatening faces in socially anxious participants. The current study investigated eye movements to emotional faces in eight patients with social phobia and 34 controls. Three different tasks with different exposure durations were used, which allowed for an investigation of the time course of attention. At the early time interval, patients showed a complex pattern of both vigilance and avoidance of threatening faces. At the longest time interval, patients avoided the eyes of sad, disgust, and neutral faces more than controls, whereas there were no group differences for angry faces.

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey A. Schofield ◽  
Albrecht W. Inhoff ◽  
Meredith E. Coles

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1173-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Waters ◽  
Liza L. Kokkoris ◽  
Karin Mogg ◽  
Brendan P. Bradley ◽  
Daniel S. Pine

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Lee ◽  
S. H. Kim ◽  
S. K. Shin ◽  
A. Wachholtz ◽  
J. H. Lee

Although the evidence of the attentional bias of chronic pain individuals toward pain-related information is established in the literature, few studies examined the time course of attention toward pain stimuli and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement toward pain-related information. This study examined the time course of attention to pain-related information and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement for pain-related information. Participants were fifty young adult participants with chronic pain (35% male, 65% female; M = 21.8 years) who completed self-report questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing levels (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)), and pain disability (the Pain Disability Index: (PDI)). Attentional engagements to pain- and anger-related information were measured by the eye tracker. Significant interaction effects were found between (1) time and stimulus type for pain-related information (F (5, 245) = 11.55, p<0.001) and (2) bias scores and pain catastrophizing (F (1, 48) = 6.736, p<0.05). These results indicated that the degree of increase for pain bias scores were significantly greater than anger bias scores as levels of pain catastrophizing increased. Results of the present study provided the evidence for the attentional bias and information processing model which has clinical implications; high levels of pain catastrophizing may impair individuals’ ability to cope with chronic pain by increasing attentional engagement toward pain-related information. The present study can add knowledge to attentional bias and pain research as this study investigated the time course of attention and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement toward pain-related information for adults with chronic pain conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document