scholarly journals Contribution of the Autonomic Nervous System to Recovery in Firefighters

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1001-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle T. Ebersole ◽  
David J. Cornell ◽  
Robert J. Flees ◽  
Corey M. Shemelya ◽  
Sabrina E. Noel

Context Sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) have accounted for nearly half of the line-of-duty deaths among US firefighters over the past 10 years. In 2018, 33% of all SCDs occurred after the end of a fire service call. Researchers have suggested that an imbalance in autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation of heart rate postcall may interfere with recovery in firefighters. Objective To use heart-rate recovery (HRR) and heart-rate variability (HRV), 2 noninvasive markers of ANS function, to examine the ANS recovery profiles of firefighters. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Firehouse and research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants Thirty-seven male career active-duty firefighters (age = 39 ± 9 years, height = 178.8 ± 5.4 cm, mass = 87.9 ± 11.2 kg). Main Outcome Measure(s) Percentage of maximal HR (%MHR) and HRV (natural log of the square root of the mean sum of the squared differences [lnRMSSD]) were collected after both submaximal and maximal exercise protocols during a 10-minute seated recovery. The HRR profiles were examined by calculating the asymptote, amplitude, and decay parameters of the monoexponential HRR curve for each participant. Results Differences in HRR parameters after 10 minutes of seated recovery were identified after submaximal versus maximal exercise (P < .001). In addition, although ANS was more suppressed after maximal exercise, HRV indicated incomplete recovery, and regardless of the test, recovery %MHR and lnRMSSD values did not return to pretest %MHR and lnRMSSD values. Conclusions Our results suggest that the ANS contributions to recovery in active-duty firefighters are exercise-intensity specific, and this is likely an important factor when establishing best-practice recovery guidelines.

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugur Nadir Karakulak ◽  
Sercan Okutucu ◽  
Levent Şahiner ◽  
Naresh Maharjan ◽  
Elifcan Aladag ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Henry H. Leon-Ariza ◽  
Daniel A. Botero-Rosas ◽  
María M. Dussan-Trujillo ◽  
Dario Reyes-Cruz ◽  
Heillym K. Suarez-Perez ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Armstrong ◽  
P Wheen ◽  
L Brandon ◽  
A Maree ◽  
R -A Kenny

Abstract The monitoring of physiological function and dysfunction is an important principle in modern medicine. Heart rate is a basic example of this type of observation, particularly assessing the neurocardiac system, which entails the autonomic nervous system and intracardiac processes. The neurocardiac axis is an underappreciated and often overlooked system which, if measured appropriately in the clinical setting, may allow identification of patients at risk of disease progression and even mortality. While heart rate itself is a simplistic tool, more information may be gathered through assessing heart rate variability and heart rate recovery time. Studies have demonstrated an association of slow heart rate recovery and lower heart rate variability as markers of elevated sympathetic and lower parasympathetic tone. These parameters have additionally been shown to relate to development of arrhythmia, heart failure, systemic inflammatory processes, ischaemic heart disease and an increased rate of mortality. The aim of this review is to detail how heart rate is homeostatically controlled by the autonomic nervous system, how heart rate can impact on pathophysiological processes, and how heart rate variability and heart rate recovery time may be used in the clinical setting to allow the neurocardiac system to be assessed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Hinc Yilmaz ◽  
Ugur Nadir Karakulak ◽  
Engin Tutkun ◽  
Ceylan Bal ◽  
Meside Gunduzoz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document